We performed a comparison between M-Files and SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software."Using M-Files means anybody on the executive team to go in and immediately look at a dashboard and know the status of a contract."
"The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good."
"The integration with other products needs to be improved."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
M-Files is ranked 8th in Document Management Software while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is ranked 14th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. M-Files is rated 9.0, while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management writes "A stable tool with good integration capabilities". M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, OpenText Documentum and Microsoft Purview Records Management, whereas SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager and IBM ECM.
We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.