Lumu vs WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Lumu Technologies Logo
697 views|264 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lumu and WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Lumu vs. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility.""Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts.""You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information.""Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.""The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

More Lumu Pros →

"It works right out of the box. You just have to enable it and you can start working.""The most important feature of this solution is the SLAs.""The initial setup was straightforward and, because we only need intrusion detection and prevention, we needed only about four hours to deploy it.""The VPN and the filtering features are the most valuable. Its VPN is very strong, and its services are very nice. The main problem in India is the service. There are not enough Check Point and Fortinet Firewall services, but for this product, the service is very good.""The alarm system is valuable."

More WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service Pros →

Cons
"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved.""Nothing so far needs to be improved.""The reports need improvement.""It would be good if we could access the physical logs.""I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

More Lumu Cons →

"The user interface and configuration can be improved.""I would like to see faster automatation.""Regarding technical support, they could use more engineers.""Multi properties could be added to the solution in the future to make it better.""Its graphical user interface could be improved because not everybody is technical. There is a lack of knowledge, and they can give some training for this solution."

More WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is the cheapest solution we found."
  • More Lumu Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is pretty reasonable compared to similar solutions."
  • "It is not expensive. Other products like Fortinet and Check Point are of the same price."
  • "The price of the solution is not expensive, it is less than FortiGate."
  • More WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.
    Top Answer:The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved. The reports are not so extensive, but they could be better.
    Top Answer:When Lumu sends us a report that something is unsound, we respond to it. Some of the things we have are automated, and some are not.
    Top Answer:The user interface can be improved because it is sometimes difficult to manage functionality. For example, the site interface is challenging to customize, and it isn't easy to retrieve information.
    Ranking
    Views
    697
    Comparisons
    264
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    446
    Rating
    9.8
    Views
    218
    Comparisons
    161
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WatchGuard IPS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

    Online attacks and malware continue to evolve, using sophisticated methods to exploit victims. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service (IPS) provides a preemptive approach to network security that adds an essential layer of threat detection and prevention. IPS protects your network from a wide range of malicious activities, including SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and buffer overflows.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Chester School District
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Wholesaler/Distributor22%
    Educational Organization13%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise54%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Lumu vs. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,063 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Lumu is ranked 14th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews while WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is ranked 31st in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews. Lumu is rated 9.8, while WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Lumu writes "Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service writes "Good VPN and filtering features, 100% stable, but needs a better graphical user interface and more training". Lumu is most compared with ExtraHop Reveal(x), Darktrace, Stellar Cyber Open XDR, LogRhythm NDR and Fortinet FortiGate IPS, whereas WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. See our Lumu vs. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.