We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."LogRhythm has shown to us, to this point in time, that it has the capabilities of being able to deliver actionable intelligence to the security engineers and analysts."
"Automations are very valuable. It provides the ability to automate some of our small use cases. The ability to integrate with other products that use an API is also very useful. LogRhythm has a plugin for it that we can connect and start to move down towards the path of a single pane of glass instead of having multiple or different tools."
"We take in around 750 million logs a day. We have a lot of products and that would be a lot of different panes of glass that we would have to look through otherwise. By centralizing, we can triage and take steps much more quickly than if we tried to man that many interfaces that come with the products."
"We now have a central point of monitoring for all potential threats."
"The daily alerts allow me to quickly find security and operations issues which need to be addressed."
"I would rate the product a ten out of ten. The solution is very user-friendly and straightforward. The tool's report customization is interesting."
"The user interface is good."
"The alarm functions have helped us cut down on the manual work. They bubble things up to us instead of our having to go look for stuff. Also, from an operational perspective, day to day, the Case Management functions are really useful for us. They allow us to track what we see in the incidents that we have."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"We've tried to work with a couple of engineering department guys there. We've called them and called them but we never hear anything back."
"I would like to see our vulnerabilities counter. We will be using Tenable to fill that void right now."
"Scalability misses the mark sometimes, especially when you have an integrated disaster recovery built into the solution."
"LogRhythm NextGen SIEM could improve by adding more applications for the banking sector. There are not any custom applications at this time."
"I would like to see more integration with more products that are out there within the same security field."
"We would like to see more things out of the console into the web UI. I guess this is what they are doing in 7.4."
"We need to get better training for things like creating code and playlists. The way it's done now takes a long time."
"Technical support could use a little work in the terms of responding back. The feedback that we received is they do need a little more staff."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
Earn 20 points
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 7th in Log Management with 166 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.