LogRhythm NetMon vs StableNet comparison

LogRhythm and Infosim are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7, while Infosim is ranked #66 with an average rating of 7.5. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Infosim’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Infosim users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NetMon

Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews

564 Views
266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StableNet

Read 3 StableNet reviews

405 Views
165 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

StableNet

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LogRhythm NetMon and StableNet are competing in network monitoring and security. StableNet appears to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive features, while LogRhythm NetMon offers attractive pricing and customer support.

Features: LogRhythm NetMon offers real-time monitoring, advanced threat detection, and security analytics. StableNet provides network infrastructure management, extensive visualization, and performance monitoring.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm NetMon could improve on visualization capabilities, broader infrastructure management, and deployment flexibility. StableNet might enhance customer response times, ease of deployment, and cost-effectiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm NetMon is known for its straightforward deployment and strong customer support. In contrast, StableNet's deployment is more complex, requiring more time and expertise, with customer service being less responsive compared to LogRhythm.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm NetMon offers a competitive setup cost with good ROI for security-centric businesses. StableNet may involve higher upfront costs but is seen as delivering strong long-term ROI due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. StableNet Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. StableNet

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

56th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

StableNet

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StableNet is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros

Information Security Analyst at Detecon Al Saudia Company Limited

A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.

Read full review

ShahzadAziz

Director of Development/Project Manager at Enablers Private Limited

A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product

The support team is more into R&D. They're not focused on support. The vendor lets the partners provide support for the solution. Partners must have StableNet-certified engineers. Complex problems arise for complex installations. When a problem is deep, it takes a lot of time to resolve it. It goes to the R&D and development teams. They do solve it, but the time taken could be reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."

"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."

"The solution is stable."

Cons

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."

"The solution is expensive."

"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

11%

Government

20%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my opinion Infosim, StableNet Enterprise is the best as it is a third-generation highly automated network management system. It enables IT departments to unify the management requirements of the...

See all answers

What do you like most about StableNet?

We can integrate any tool with StableNet.

See all answers

What needs improvement with StableNet?

The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement. The product must have the plug-ins ready for standard integrations.

See all answers

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 31% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 15% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs StableNet

Compared 70% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs StableNet

Compared 30% of the time

More StableNet Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

May 2025

Download StableNet product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

No data available

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

StableNet provides Fault, Performance, Configuration, and Services Management on a single platform.
It is a vendor agnostic solution, built upon a single, consistent code base. The solution is easy to integrate and provides high performance while keeping low hardware requirements.

The unified network & services management approach has been proven with a large number of installations in key industry sectors like energy, finance, manufacturing, retail, telecommunications, and many more.

With this all-in-one NMS approach, Infosim revolutionizes the management of large heterogeneous network infrastructures.

Infosim

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

Athenahealth, Barratt, Nocsult, Nucleus Connect, SCC

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. StableNet

June 2025

Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. StableNet

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. StableNet and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. StableNet report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.