LogRhythm NetMon vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant comparison

LogRhythm and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. LogRhythm is ranked #56 with an average rating of 7.7, while Juniper is ranked #49 with an average rating of 9.0. LogRhythm holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NetMon

Read 11 LogRhythm NetMon reviews

564 Views
266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

259 Views
110 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

LogRhythm NetMon and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network monitoring and management. Marvis shows the upper hand with advanced features and AI-driven capabilities, providing higher perceived value.

Features: LogRhythm NetMon offers real-time network monitoring, deep packet analytics, and robust threat detection capabilities, focusing on network security. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant delivers AI-driven troubleshooting, network optimization with actionable insights, and automation, enhancing network performance and control.

Room for Improvement: LogRhythm NetMon may benefit from enhanced AI integration and more seamless cloud-based deployment options, as well as increased automation capabilities for improved network performance. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant could improve by expanding threat detection features, offering a more competitive pricing structure, and enhancing user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogRhythm NetMon provides straightforward deployment with strong support and comprehensive customer service for smooth integration. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant offers seamless cloud-based deployment and self-service capabilities, supported by excellent customer guidance.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm NetMon features a competitive pricing structure, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with an attractive ROI. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant, while more expensive, is considered a worthwhile investment for its advanced AI capabilities and high return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

56th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

KeithGalleros

Information Security Analyst at Detecon Al Saudia Company Limited

A solution providing visibility into all data traversing your network but needs to be more cost-efficient

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management. I'd also like to see LogRhythm NetMon improve in terms of cost efficiency, especially regarding adding new products that may overlap in functionality. Specifically, I would appreciate enhanced detection and response capabilities directly integrated into NetMon to avoid needing additional rules or tools from LogRhythm. Regarding integration capabilities, I think NetMon's current agent-based approach is limiting. Integrating with protocols like Gflow and Netflow would be better, allowing seamless integration with our existing network equipment. This would solve the problem of agent-based restrictions and improve overall integration.

Read full review

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

Cons

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

24%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 31% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 17% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 15% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 30% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 18% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 11% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon

June 2025

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

May 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

No data available

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NetMon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

June 2025

Free Report: LogRhythm NetMon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NetMon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm NetMon vs. Marvis Virtual Network Assistant report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.