LogRhythm NDR [EOL] vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Exabeam and Trellix are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Additionally, 100% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Read 3 LogRhythm NDR [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Network Detection a...

Read 40 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews

2,271 Views
772 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Trellix Network Detection a...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Trellix Network Detection and Response and LogRhythm NDR [EOL] compete in the network detection and response market. Based on features, LogRhythm is preferred for its comprehensive capabilities, while Trellix stands out with strong support and competitive pricing.

Features: Trellix Network Detection and Response offers robust threat detection capabilities, advanced analytics, and intuitive integration with existing systems. LogRhythm NDR [EOL] provides deep packet inspection, robust anomaly detection, and extensive data visualization tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers a straightforward deployment process with solid support, ensuring minimal disruption to operations. LogRhythm NDR [EOL] presents a steeper learning curve due to its complex features but offers detailed documentation and efficient customer service to aid in overcoming initial hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Network Detection and Response offers a compelling pricing structure with fast returns on investment due to efficient threat mitigation. LogRhythm NDR [EOL] may require a higher upfront cost, but its extensive feature suite and enhanced security insights justify the investment for those prioritizing comprehensive network protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Detection and Response (NDR) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Network Detection a...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (12th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (10th)

Featured Reviews

AshishDubey

Product manager at Tata Communications Ltd

A scalable and stable tool that offers users a great GUI

Though I have not extensively worked on LogRhythm NDR, I know the need for a compute side since, in the past, we had required the compute side to deploy the solution in one of our company's client's infrastructure. The product's setup phase was easy and not complicated. The deployment process of LogRhythm NDR can vary between three and four weeks, depending on the skill set of the people involved in the deployment process. For deployment of the product, you have to purchase the license from LogRhythm, and you have to ensure that the compute side is ready for LogRhythm. After you deploy NDR and sensors in the premises of our company's customer on the SPAN and TAP port, and once the logs go through throughput, you can see the logs coming to LogRhythm NDR's console.

Read full review

Jose Vargas

Agente De Servicios Técnicos at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Has improved threat detection workflows and supports seamless customer monitoring

The best features Trellix Network Detection and Response offers include very good threat detection, and I believe that it is one of the best XDR tools. For example, ePO and XDR components are very comfortable and similar to many other tools for this type of monitoring, and I have received very good feedback for this tool. What makes Trellix Network Detection and Response stand out for me compared to other tools is the way you can detect threats. It is very easy and comfortable to use, and the detection shows clearly on the screen, which is very easy to understand. Regarding the features, I think that the integration with other platforms is very comfortable with the customer because we can integrate it with any switch or firewall, and it is comfortable to add this tool. Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization as I have improved my knowledge about detection and response. I have already used some other tools such as CrowdStrike and Umbrella, but Trellix is one of the best that I have tested. I believe that for my organization, Trellix has helped a lot with detection and supported our customers effectively. Trellix Network Detection and Response is a great tool that integrates with a lot of security tools such as Palo Alto, which is a good firewall. If you have these types of tools, your organization would benefit greatly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's an excellent security tool with a user-friendly interface that's easy for anyone to use."

"The solution doesn't require the creation of rules or use cases from scratch, which assists our delivery team in installation and deployment. Its dashboard is user-friendly."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement and that nothing else was infected. It helped us correlate the events and feel confident in our containment."

"The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."

"Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."

"Trellix NDR provides an essential defense by automatically responding to network incidents that firewalls may not catch."

"The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks."

"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline."

"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros

Cons

"From an improvement perspective, I would like LogRhythm NDR to reduce the compute size. I would also like LogRhythm NDR to improve the pricing model."

"The tool has one limitation compared to its competitors. It does have a mobile app for NDR monitoring. Moreover, there is only operational training and not deployment training."

"There are opportunities for improvement, particularly in upgrading the expertise of local professionals and addressing support issues, which could potentially lead to cost reduction."

"The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless."

"Technical support could be improved."

"Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."

"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."

"It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules."

"I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it somewhere else."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When looking at the market and comparing it with other vendors, the cost seems relatively high."

"The tool costs are two million rupees for 5000 users."

"There are certain payments to be made towards the licensing costs attached to the product yearly. The pricing of LogRhythm NDR falls under the mid-range, in my opinion."

"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."

"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."

"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."

"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."

"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."

"It's an expensive solution."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NDR?

The tool costs are two million rupees for 5000 users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NDR?

The tool has one limitation compared to its competitors. It does have a mobile app for NDR monitoring. Moreover, there is only operational training and not deployment training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm NDR?

Our use cases are mostly for mining, telco, finance, and banking industries.

See all answers

What do you like most about FireEye Network Security?

We wanted to cross-reference that activity with the network traffic just to be sure there was no lateral movement. With Trellix, we easily confirmed that there was no lateral network involvement an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is very great.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?

I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it some...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetWitness NDR vs LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Sangfor Cyber Command vs LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Vectra AI vs LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Darktrace vs LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

LinkShadow NDR vs LogRhythm NDR [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More LogRhythm NDR [EOL] Competitors

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 9% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 8% of the time

Darktrace vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trellix Network Detection and Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

January 2026

Download LogRhythm NDR [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Network Detection and Response

December 2025

Trellix Network Detection and Response report

Download Trellix Network Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm MistNet

FireEye Network Security, FireEye

Overview

LogRhythm NDR [EOL] was an innovative approach to network detection and response, facilitating enhanced threat monitoring and incident response.

LogRhythm NDR [EOL] offered comprehensive detection capabilities that enabled organizations to quickly identify and investigate network anomalies. It integrated seamlessly with security operations, providing meaningful insights and analysis for better threat management. The adaptable technology ensured it remained relevant despite the evolving threat landscape.

What were the key features?

Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous oversight to promptly detect any suspicious activities
Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregular patterns to pre-empt potential cyber threats
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing security infrastructure for enhanced efficiency
Threat Intelligence: Leverages advanced data to assess and respond to security incidents

What benefits did LogRhythm NDR [EOL] offer?

Speedy Incident Response: Facilitates quick actions against detected threats to minimize risks
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential financial losses by improving threat detection and response
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens defense mechanisms against sophisticated attacks
Operational Streamlining: Improves workflow efficiency with integrated security operations

LogRhythm NDR [EOL] found its place in diverse industries like finance and healthcare where it bolstered compliance and regulatory efforts. Its adaptable nature made it suitable for implementation across sectors with high-security demands.

Exabeam

Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

Trellix

Sample Customers

EMW, Conduent, University of Massachusetts, Deloitte Canada, Central Bank of Barbados, Coalfire

FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Trend Micro and others in Network Detection and Response (NDR). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.