LogLogic and Snare compete in the log management and SIEM market. Snare seems to have the upper hand due to its straightforward deployment and comprehensive features, making it a superior choice overall.
Features: LogLogic users highlight its powerful analytics, broad data integration capabilities, and substantial operational insights. Snare users appreciate its extensive logging capabilities, simple integration process, and ease of troubleshooting. Snare is preferred for its ease of use and robust feature set.
Room for Improvement: LogLogic users suggest improving the product’s intuitive navigation, simplifying the initial setup, and enhancing customization options. Snare reviews point towards enhancing detailed reporting features, improving support documentation, and expanding training materials. Snare has fewer user concerns, making it slightly better in addressing improvement areas.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogLogic’s deployment model is considered cumbersome, requiring extensive time and resources. Its customer service receives mixed reviews with some delays in response times. Snare is praised for easy deployment, often completed within a short timeframe, and effective customer service support. Snare outperforms LogLogic in both deployment and customer service efficiencies.
Pricing and ROI: LogLogic is viewed as costly, with users questioning the high setup costs and time-intensive ROI. Snare offers more competitive pricing, favorable user feedback on value for investment, and quicker ROI. Thus, Snare is perceived as more cost-effective and beneficial in the long term.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Snare | 0.8% |
| LogLogic | 0.7% |
| Other | 98.5% |
Snare customers consistently tell us that as the financial and reputational consequences of data breaches, cyber threats like malware and ransomware and the constant risks from insider threats increase that they have urgent and ongoing requirements for maintaining regulatory compliance, auditing and managing cyber threat detection and response. They also tell us that existing solutions like SIEM are often complex to implement and maintain, require specialised technical resources or are increasingly unaffordable or variable in their pricing. As a result of these increased requirements Prophecy International has created the Snare product suite.
Compliance requirements can include any number of regulatory mandates including PCI-DSS, Sarbanes Oxley, HIPAA, NERC, GDPR and more. This makes Snare a high value solution for companies in the Government, Defence and Military sectors, Banking, Finance and Insurance, Retail, Health, Energy, Oil & Gas markets.
Snare is a complete suite of Centralised Log Management (CLM), Security Analytics and SIEM tools.
Created by ex military personnel for military use it offers the highest level of security.
Designed to work as part of your security ecosystem Snare also integrates with most other SIEMs including SPLUNK, QRadar, ARCSight and many more. With over 3,000 customers worldwide using Snare for compliance, auditing and threat response, Snare is the name you can trust.
From Enterprise Agents for Windows, Unix, Linux, OSX, Flat files and Databases to a complete forensics and long term log storage platform, agent management console, multipoint log reflector, advanced log analytics and next gen SIEM capability. Either hosted or on prem with both Opex and Capex pricing models, Snare is a one stop shop for CLM and SIEM. Snare product suite is broadly split into two areas:
Centralised Log Management incorporates and 4 core technologies
Snare Analytics incorporates another 4 core technologies
These products can be bought independently or combined into a compete solution. You can also “mix and match” with your current security technologies ensuring that you can leverage your existing investments.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
