Lenovo Edge Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers comparison

Lenovo and Oracle are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Lenovo is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Lenovo holds a 0.7% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Oracle’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lenovo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Lenovo Edge Servers

Read 2 Lenovo Edge Servers reviews

335 Views
222 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle SPARC Servers

Read 7 Oracle SPARC Servers reviews

2,039 Views
1,439 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Lenovo Edge Servers

Oracle SPARC Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Oracle SPARC Servers and Lenovo Edge Servers are significant contenders in the enterprise server market. Lenovo Edge Servers have the upper hand due to their advanced computing capabilities, appealing to modern technological needs.

Features: Oracle SPARC Servers deliver exceptional reliability, scalability, and strong support, making them a preferred choice for long-term implementations. Lenovo Edge Servers are known for cutting-edge computing capabilities, edge processing, and superior technological features, offering high-performance solutions for businesses.

Room for Improvement: Oracle SPARC Servers benefit from modernization, integration capabilities, and enhanced user interfaces. Lenovo Edge Servers could improve customer support, streamline documentation, and refine user interaction experiences. Each product has specific areas where improvements can be made to enhance their offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle SPARC Servers are straightforward to deploy but face inconsistent customer support experiences. Lenovo Edge Servers have mixed deployment complexity, but their strong customer service often balances initial setup challenges, providing user-centric support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle SPARC Servers are cost-effective with favorable ROI in large-scale projects. Lenovo Edge Servers may have higher initial costs but promise substantial long-term benefits, making the investment worthwhile with promising returns over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Lenovo Edge Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Lenovo Edge Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lenovo Edge Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

11th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle SPARC Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of Lenovo Edge Servers is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SPARC Servers is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Hawi Nadew

Data center and cloud solution engineer at IE Network Solutions PLC

A budget-friendly tool that offers good stability

I don't have much to comment on what requires improvement in the product because my company is more engaged with Dell's servers than Lenovo's ones. I'm not that much familiar with Lenovo. My company has seen that the servers from Lenovo offer good performance and high scalability, so I don't see any scope for improvement in the solution. With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile. With ThinkAgile in the picture, there are two different vendors, Lenovo and VMware. Suppose VMware and Lenovo come together, then they produce a common product. In the case of the servers under Lenovo, the virtualization software is again both from VMware and Dell, and the licenses are deployed on the server. Different vendors manage the servers from Lenovo that fall under ThinkAgile and VMware, so if there is a way that allows Lenovo and VMware to produce a system together like ThinKAgile, then it would be a good improvement.

Read full review

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

A rock-solid OS and rich virtualization features for hosting many VMs on one box

Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform. Oracle is focusing on the cloud platform with a PCA and standard x86 architecture. Linux is their other OS and is mostly in the cloud. We don't see much development happening on Solaris even though it came as an acquisition from Sun Microsystems. Eventually, the solution and its platform will die because there has been no new development on the Solaris end and we haven't seen new servers in the last five years. At this point, we are pretty sure there is no real roadmap or future for the solution. There is a shortage of expert engineers because Oracle is not pushing the technology. It is hard for us to find engineers because the number of people supporting us has considerably reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like Lenovo's XClarity Controller, and the ability to control and deploy Edge Servers through this XClarity interface."

"It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability."

"I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU."

"The performance is the best feature."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"Our customers are happy with many features in Oracle SPARC Servers, like the automatic ASR feature."

"The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization."

"The operating system is rock solid and the best I have ever used."

"The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible."

Cons

"Airflow in the servers can be a problem. Sometimes we cannot add CPU to Edge Servers because there's not enough airflow in the appliance."

"With Lenovo, when it comes to its HCI-related part, which includes ThinkAgile, users may face issues as VMware licenses are not linked with ThinkAgile."

"Oracle SPARC Servers should be fine-tuned well enough to work with the other servers and software products in the market, as it is an area where Oracle SPARC Servers lack."

"I would like to see a reduced price point."

"They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models."

"Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform."

"Like IBM, Oracle SPARC Servers should be able to run other open operating systems like Linux."

"They have declared the end of life of the hardware."

"The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is available to users at a low price."

"My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution."

"The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it."

"Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"The hardware is expensive but it has very rich virtualization features that make it economical."

"The licensing is flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lenovo Edge Servers?

It is a stable solution. The product doesn't have any problems when it comes to stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lenovo Edge Servers?

The solution is available to users at a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lenovo Edge Servers?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle SPARC Servers?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SPARC Servers?

My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution. My company's clients, who have paid for the licensing costs attached to the solution, have also engaged with so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SPARC Servers?

Oracle products are usually fine-tuned with the software of other Oracle products, like Oracle WebLogic Server Services, Oracle Database, and Oracle Core Banking Software and Solutions, as all the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 56% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 31% of the time

HPE Moonshot vs Lenovo Edge Servers

Compared 13% of the time

More Lenovo Edge Servers Competitors

IBM Power Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 42% of the time

Intel Server System vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 26% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle SPARC Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

May 2025

Download Lenovo Edge Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

May 2025

Download Oracle SPARC Servers product report

Also Known As

ThinkSystem Edge Servers, ThinkSystem SE Series, Lenovo SE Series, Lenovo ThinkSystem Edge Servers

No data available

Overview

Designed and built with the unique requirements for Edge servers in mind, it is versatile enough to stretch the limitations of server locations, providing a variety of connectivity and security options and easily managed with Lenovo XClarity Controller. The ThinkSystem SE350 is a rugged compact-sized Edge solution with a focus on smart connectivity, business security, and manageability for the harsh environment.

Lenovo

Oracle's SPARC S7, T7, and M7 Servers with always-on memory intrusion protection and comprehensive data encryption secure data with no performance penalty. Security in silicon features and Oracle Solaris protect data in memory from unauthorized access and stop malware before it gets in.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

University Hospitals Leuven, B&H Photo, Tuscon Electric Power, IS Nordic, Siemens

Buyer's Guide

Lenovo Edge Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

April 2025

Free Report: Lenovo Edge Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about Lenovo Edge Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lenovo Edge Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.