We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and ReadyAPI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client."
"ReadyAPI's best features are that it's user-friendly and its behavior-driven development is flexible."
"The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are the drag-and-drop options and the integration with versioning tool solutions, such as Git."
"A single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and service actualization."
"When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API."
"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are the ready-to-use assertions and filters which can perform the validation. If we want to filter out any value, the filters are available. Apart from that database integration, if you want to go ahead and perform validation in the database layer it is possible with the ready-to-use feature available. The execution and reporting are rich features."
"The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"The reporting in ReadyAPI could be better. It can become sloppy, sometimes it works and other times it does not."
"ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time."
"There are lots of options within the solution, however they are not upfront or user-friendly."
"ReadyAPI can improve because it is limited to only SOAP and REST services. They should update the solution to include more protocols so that other people are not limited to SOAP and REST services. Other than would be able to utilize it."
"The solution is made up of multiple tools, and the one additional feature we'd like to have is load testing."
"Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions."
"The Property Transfer capability could be more user friendly because it is a bit difficult to understand."
"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 18 reviews while ReadyAPI is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 34 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 9.0, while ReadyAPI is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Perfecto and Tricentis Tosca, whereas ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, ReadyAPI Test and SmartBear TestComplete. See our LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.