Nutanix AHV and KVM compete in the virtualization market, offering distinct advantages depending on user needs. Nutanix AHV's deep integration and user-friendly management give it the upper hand for businesses seeking simplicity and comprehensive support, while KVM's flexibility and cost-effectiveness cater to those prioritizing customization and budget.
Features: Nutanix AHV integrates storage and compute services seamlessly, creating a simplified hyper-converged infrastructure. It offers a user-friendly management interface and professional support options. KVM, being open-source, provides flexibility and customization, strong performance, and security features that appeal to tech-savvy users.
Room for Improvement: KVM requires more user-friendly management tools and better platform integration. Its reliance on command-line interfaces poses challenges for newcomers. AHV needs faster technical support response and improved orchestration features. Both could benefit from enhanced documentation and integration with emerging technologies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix AHV offers straightforward deployment due to its integrated nature, backed by professional support. However, its support framework and community engagement need improvement. KVM, while versatile, depends on community assistance for successful deployment and lacks robust official support compared to enterprise solutions.
Pricing and ROI: KVM is a cost-effective option, being open-source and eliminating licensing fees, which enhances ROI by reducing operating costs. Nutanix AHV offers value through integrated package deals despite a higher initial investment, reducing long-term expenses and appealing to organizations with complex infrastructure needs.
KVM definitely saves costs since it is open-source and does not obligate us to pay for licenses as necessary with other virtualization solutions.
Paid support is also obtainable from companies like Red Hat for more critical issues.
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
The solution is very stable.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
I would give the stability a seven out of ten at the moment, primarily due to the issues I've had with updates.
In comparison to VMware, which offers a more balanced set of management features, KVM could improve in terms of user-friendly tooling.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
Compared to VMware and Microsoft, KVM offers better pricing and licensing options.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft.
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is an open-source virtualization technology that is embedded in Linux. KVM allows users to seamlessly transform their Linux system into a hypervisor that, in turn, will enable a host machine to run numerous, isolated virtual environments or virtual machines (VMs).
KVM is part of Linux. Users with Linux 2.6.20 or newer already have KVM. As KVM is already a component of the current Linux code, it automatically improves with every new Linux fix, feature, or upgrade. So KVM users are always current and up to date.
KVM automatically transforms Linux to a type -1 (bare-metal) hypervisor. All hypervisors need operating system components, such as a process scheduler, I/O stack, device drivers, memory manager, and more, to run a VM. KVM already has these components embedded, as it is part of the Linux kernel. Each VM is generated as a basic Linux proces,s which is maintained by the standard Linux scheduler, with dedicated hardware such as a graphics adapter, memory, disks, network card, and CPUs.
KVM Key Features:
KVM has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:
Reviews from Real Users
“The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so. KVM, as a native virtualization solution, is a complete and fully adequate system for small businesses that need to reduce costs, and also to make maintenance easier. “ - Georges E., Business Engineer and Consultant at All-Tech
“The most valuable feature of KVM is the hypervisor environment and how we can configure it with ease. Additionally, the interface is intuitive.” Sonu S., Senior Solution Architect at Micro Focus
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.