Systems Engeneer at Wurth Australia Pty. Ltd. | 4.5 | In our virtualized environment focused on sales and retail, I find Nutanix AHV's high availability, replication, and user-friendly interface advantageous. However, upgradability issues arise with Lenovo hardware, necessitating cautious firmware and system updates. Previously, I've used VMware and Citrix. |
Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | We chose Nutanix AHV for on-premise cloud projects due to its cost-effectiveness and license-free hypervisor. The one-click upgrade feature simplifies management, though improvement is needed in the patching process and compatibility with third-party vendor images. |
Network & Server Administrator at TTSE | 4.0 | I use Nutanix AHV for hosting virtual environments due to its efficient snapshot and backup capabilities. However, the interface is cluttered and lacks intuitive insights. I switched from VxRail to Nutanix to enhance my virtualization setup. |
Product Manager, Dell Client Solutions at Team Computers | 4.5 | I've used Nutanix AHV Virtualization for two years; it's scalable, hardware-independent, and cost-effective, though improvements in Windows compatibility and GUI are needed. Deployment is easy, support is excellent, and it simplifies disaster recovery and data center consolidation. |
Technical Manager at Optimistic Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd | 5.0 | I’ve used Nutanix AHV Virtualization for over six years to modernize client data centers, appreciating its reliability, speed, and self-healing. Despite complex setup and high cost, its performance, scalability, and support make it a top choice. |
Enterprise Architect at Wipro Limited | 4.5 | We manage virtual desktops for over 80 customers using Nutanix AHV for its efficient resource management, cost savings, and simplified operations. Despite its smaller market share and limited ecosystem compared to VMware and Hyper-V, AHV offers competitive licensing and integration advantages. |
Assistant Manager System Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | We use Nutanix AHV for running VMs and appreciate its open-source nature and built-in Docker capabilities. Unlike VMware, it offers cost-effective licensing and all-in-one solutions like snapshot functionalities. However, improvements are needed in guest tools for better application-consistent backups. |
Integration Manager at Gilat Satellite Networks | 5.0 | I use Nutanix AHV for cloud services and IT. It offers excellent uptime, easy troubleshooting, and effective built-in data protection for quick backups. Although pricing could be better, I also explore alternatives like VMware, Hyper-V, and KVM. |