IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

KVM vs Oracle VM VirtualBox comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
KVM Logo
Read 9 KVM reviews.
60,012 views|52,345 comparisons
Oracle Logo
35,743 views|28,265 comparisons
Executive Summary
Updated on March 29, 2022

We performed a comparison between KVM and Oracle VM VirtualBox based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both KVM and Oracle VM VirtualBox say that deployment is straightforward.
  • Features: Valuable features of both KVM and Oracle VM VirtualBox include ease of use and management, and good stability.

    Valuable features of KVM include good performance and flexibility. Reviewers would like to see improvement in scalability and better integration capabilities.

    Users of Oracle VM VirtualBox like that it is user friendly and has good integrations and good scalability. Reviewers mention that the product has some issues with starting and stopping, and also comment that they would prefer if there was a web version.
  • Pricing: Reviewers of both solutions like that there is an open-source version available. Users of both solutions say for the paid version, pricing is reasonable.
  • Service and Support: Most KVM users have not needed to rely on technical support. Of the few that did, they say it could be better. Users of Oracle VM VirtualBox feel that service and support have been responsive.

Comparison Results: Both KVM and Oracle VM VirtualBox have their strengths and weaknesses. Oracle VM VirtualBox seems to be the more favorable choice of the two, since it offers good scalability whereas scalability seems to be an ongoing issue for KVM users.

Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
598,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The GUI interface makes the management of KVM easier than ever before.""I like that it's easy to manage. It's also more powerful when it comes to security than others. That point of view is the one consideration. The other consideration is that it's cost-effective.""This solution is open source and easy to configure.""KVM is stable.""It is easy to use, stable, and flexible. It is a pretty mature product, and it is faster than VirtualBox.""If you prefer command-line, there are all kinds of command-line options.""Very cost-effective.""I have found KVM to be scalable."

More KVM Pros →

"The solution is very convenient and easy to use.""I like that it is free and runs on Linux/Ubuntu - I wouldn't use any other solution. I am able to perform small developing tests.""It's a pretty good product in terms of monitoring.""Oracle VM VirtualBox is easy to use.""It's very simple to use.""The pause feature is valuable. I can pause, which is something that not all hypervisors allow. The snapshot feature is also valuable.""The solution has high performance and is easy to use.""This product is very user-friendly and easy to use."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox Pros →

Cons
"Business continuity features need to be added.""Monitoring and resolution could be improved.""Its resource usage can be improved.""In our setup, we do not have any dashboards or orchestration, and it is hard to manage. We have 25 gig network cards, but the software driver we have only supported 10 gigs.""There are some issues with the graphics and some software that is very complex.""Technical support could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an improved user interface and dashboard. This type of improvement will make it easy or help our engineers understand the solution from a requirement point of view.""Lacks high availability across clusters as well as support for Apache CloudStack.""I have previously used VMware and KVM is easier to use. However, they both have their strengths depending on their use cases. They are mostly equal. One of VMware's advantages is it has better support."

More KVM Cons →

"It has some issues when you have some weird device drivers. For instance, when you have a weird sound driver working on your machine, and the VirtualBox needs to output the sound of the virtual machine into the sound driver of the physical machine, the bare metal, it doesn't work too well. If you tweak lots of drivers and play around with the different kinds of drivers and machines, you will probably break something. I have not played with it too much and maybe it already supports it, but it would probably be good to have the ability to use a container from the virtual machine environment instead of spinning off a complete virtual machine. There are other tools for that. On Linux, you have a DXE, LXC framework, and you have Docker as well. Docker is good because it is multi-platform, and you can run Docker on pretty much anything, even different processors, but it would be good if we had a VirtualBox running on it while spinning off containers instead of full virtual machines. The other thing that will become important, and I'm pretty sure that they are thinking about it as well is that there's this new hardware platform that Apple is releasing, which is an ARM-based new chip. So, VirtualBox will probably have to work on ARM-based CPUs as well.""The solution could be more user-friendly.""Basically, the GUI and command-line interface need improvement.""The AI and the UI could be improved. The user interface is a little outdated and the AI is not very attractive.""The memory and hardware usage could be a little bit lighter. Right now, it's quite heavy on the usage. The CPU usage should be lower.""Oracle VM VirtualBox is not flexible, It's not like VMware.""It would be good if we could use Hyper-V Windows subsystems with Linux and VirtualBox on the same instance. Currently, to be able to use VirtualBox, we have to restart the machine into an instance of Windows where Hyper-V is disabled, which is understandably very inconvenient.""There are a few bugs that need to be updated."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is free for everyone."
  • "The price is fair compared to others. But in our local market, it's a problem to get budget approval from management. That's why they are trying to get those products so we can give them the price benefit. But if you consider the international market or other products, it's sometimes better than their price."
  • "We had some problems with the licensing."
  • "KVM is priced reasonably."
  • More KVM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is pretty good for the price, which is free."
  • "This is an open-source product and it can be used free of charge."
  • "There are no licensing fees."
  • "The license I use is free."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "No licensing is required as it is open-source."
  • More Oracle VM VirtualBox Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
    598,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    KVM scales better, orchestration better, performs better and supports a wider range of hardware and, also, you can implement at ZERO cost and with a very powerful web interface for management, from… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Small support team, small cluster, low core count, use VMware products Large support team, large clusters with many cores, use KVM. KVM scales better, orchestration better, performs better and… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Far from being an expert, my opinion is that the positive sides of KVM are: Lower costs and open-source which gives the abilities to customize it according to the specific needs of each customer.
    Top Answer: 
    KVM is easy to use, stable and flexible. It is mature and very fast. It is an affordable open-source solution that is easy to set up and manage. It offers very good security. It has a virtual manager… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The solution has high performance and is easy to use.
    Ranking
    Views
    60,012
    Comparisons
    52,345
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.4
    Views
    35,743
    Comparisons
    28,265
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    KVM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V). It consists of a loadable kernel module, kvm.ko, that provides the core virtualization infrastructure and a processor specific module, kvm-intel.ko or kvm-amd.ko.

    Oracle VM Virtualbox is a cross-platform virtualizer for x86 servers and desktops, and is also for embedded usage. With this product, you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine, all at the same time, making it a powerful tool to test, develop, demonstrate and deploy solutions.

    Oracle VM Virtualbox is a professional solution that is also freely available as Open Source Software. It is for both enterprise and home use. This x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization software is high performing and rich in features. 

    Oracle VM Virtualbox currently runs on Windows, Linux, Solaris and Macintosh. It also supports many guest operating systems, such as Windows, DOX/Windows 3. Linux, OS/2, OpenBSD, Solaris and OpenSolaris.

    For more information on Oracle VM VirtualBox, visit Oracle.com

    Offer
    Learn more about KVM
    Learn more about Oracle VM VirtualBox
    Sample Customers
    MediaWiki, Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikidata, Wikiversity, Commons
    Airbus, Colorado State University, SCS Africa, Wolf Medical Systems.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Energy/Utilities Company22%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider40%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government6%
    Educational Organization4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    University12%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise32%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise28%
    Buyer's Guide
    KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    598,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    KVM is ranked 4th in Server Virtualization Software with 9 reviews while Oracle VM VirtualBox is ranked 5th in Server Virtualization Software with 13 reviews. KVM is rated 7.4, while Oracle VM VirtualBox is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of KVM writes "Stable, easy to set up, and very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM VirtualBox writes "A free and versatile open-source solution that supports multiple platforms and is easy to set up". KVM is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, Oracle VM and VMware Workstation, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, Oracle VM and VMware Workstation. See our KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox report.

    See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

    We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.