Kiteworks vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kiteworks and Seeburger are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Kiteworks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Seeburger is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Kiteworks holds a 3.8% mindshare in MFT, compared to Seeburger’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

6,246 Views
2,561 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

9,038 Views
1,808 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Kiteworks both compete in the field of integration and file transfer solutions. SEEBURGER seems to have the upper hand in terms of integration capabilities, while Kiteworks excels in secure file transfer protocols.

Features: SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers outstanding management of diverse communication protocols, a user-friendly interface for newcomers, and allows for custom business process designs using its BPM designer. Meanwhile, Kiteworks provides secure file sharing and access control features, efficient large file transactions up to 100 GB, and supports two-factor authentication for enhanced security.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER users note the need for a simplified interface, better error monitoring, and improvements in OEM protocol adapters. Kiteworks users suggest improving admin console stability, streamlining the offboarding process, and seeking faster support and resolution times for system lags.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER primarily supports on-premises deployment, with users calling for improved support quality and localization. Kiteworks offers flexible deployment options including cloud solutions and is appreciated for its centralized support structure despite occasional time zone-related communication barriers.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER is seen as expensive but cost-effective with its extensive features, albeit with a complicated licensing structure. Users find ROI in operational efficiencies and reduced manpower. Kiteworks' pricing varies by region and configuration but is considered justified by its security advantages. Both products show ROI through efficiency gains and automation of manual tasks.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,325 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (27th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), API Management (24th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 3.8%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 3.4%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kiteworks	3.8%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	3.4%
Other	92.8%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful feature of this solution is to share files with external parties and we can use this functionality to share files internally too."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."

"Kiteworks is easy to manage and maintain with a user-friendly interface and I recommend it to anyone that requires a file-sharing system that supports SFTP."

More Kiteworks pros

"We minimized our complexity and decreased the number of systems to communicate with our partners, yielding cost savings and a centralized platform that serves as the gate to our suppliers and customers."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS), as an application within Ingram Micro, contributes around 30 percent of the revenue."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) provides us with the solutions we need."

"Another aspect that we employed in the last year-and-a-half has been their CMA platform component, which hooks to the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) front end. We've been able to set up an automatic testing process for our partners."

"One of the most valuable features is the option to have all integration patterns constantly updated in one platform. That is the main strength I see in using SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). It means I can use a very old-fashioned pattern, combined with a very modern pattern. There are no limitations in terms of combining components because all the components simply fit together."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is simple to use and straightforward."

"What improved was the ability to bring on who we wanted when we wanted to at the pace we wanted to."

"We can use it to script and monitor processes."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"We have experienced some issues with stability due to bugs."

"There is one particular thing that is a nuisance."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

More Kiteworks cons

"Error messages in the main area could be better, but you can say that about any product."

"That is the component that we definitely have the biggest issue with."

"Some of the functionality for retriggering documents, where you have to step through a termination process and then retrigger it, versus just being able to restart or retrigger more easily, is a bit challenging, depending on the scenario."

"Their technical support is okay. It doesn't blow you away."

"Java is very old technology and they should move away from it, to anything that's better."

"API connectivity needs improvement as well as the GUI. The GUI hasn't changed that much in 10 years, but of course, that's already been updated. I would say I'm excited about the screenshots but that's about it."

"The solution's documentation is not up to the mark and needs to be improved."

"The product is not integrated very well with different cloud providers. We did work with the vendor to build a solution for Amazon, but there is no solution for other cloud providers like Google or Azure. The vendor needs to create adapters so that if we have a requirement to transfer data from our data center to another cloud, outside of Amazon, we would be delighted with that."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"They need to be more competitively priced. When it comes to training, they need to lower their prices. It shouldn't be so specific. Maybe they should outsource training to another company. From what I can see, their training is pretty expensive, and they don't do anything for free."

"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper."

"The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business."

"On an annual basis, our support costs, which are based on the licensing, are about £120,000."

"Price and licensing are comparable to other systems. It's well-priced and simple. It's not user-based or anything. It's just per seat, per system. So, it's pretty straight forward. Because it's per system, one system is enough. However, if you want to make it larger, then you can grow with it."

"It has a very goofy pricing model in the sense that they have so many components and it's not very clear what components you require to do your work. When you ask for that, you learn that there's a surcharge for them. It's not that you buy a product and you can use all the compatibilities. They have all these different bits and pieces of it and you have to pay extra for all those things."

"The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard."

"Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Seclore Email Encryption vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 6% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

September 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

September 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Accellion

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Kiteworks

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a versatile platform supporting multiple integration patterns with rich adapters and easy Java coding, known for fault tolerance and seamless SAP integration.

SEEBURGER offers extensive EDI capabilities and adaptability across protocols. The platform provides tools for entity flow, data mapping, message tracking, and high-volume performance. Appreciated for reliability, scalability, and automation, it enables independent adaptation, maintaining stability in efficient data communication. However, handling large datasets can be challenging. Users desire improved cloud and API integration, enhanced error handling, and more accessible training resources. Frequent updates and new features are valued, but customization can be slow, and support experiences are inconsistent.

What are the most important features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Flexible Integration: Supports multiple integration patterns and protocols.
Rich Adapter Suite: Extensive adapter options available.
Seamless SAP Integration: Enables smooth SAP processes.
EDI Capabilities: Comprehensive electronic data interchange support.
Fault Tolerance: Maintains stability and reliable operation.
Entity Flow Tools: Provides detailed data mapping and message tracking.

What benefits may organizations look for in reviews when evaluating SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data and organizational needs.
Automation: Reduces need for programming expertise.
Protocol Adaptability: Supports diverse communication standards.

In industries, SEEBURGER is used for EDI transactions, partner communication, and data integration. Organizations benefit from scripting, process monitoring, certifications, and secure transfers like AS2 and SFTP, facilitating data conversion and internal connections. Implemented on-premises and in the cloud, SEEBURGER adapts to custom business processes.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

September 2026

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.