Kiteworks vs Oracle Beehive comparison

Kiteworks and Oracle are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Kiteworks is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #23. Kiteworks holds a 2.4% mindshare in CCP, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,947 Views
442 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Beehive

Read 2 Oracle Beehive reviews

346 Views
149 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Oracle Beehive

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Kiteworks and Oracle Beehive are platforms in the secure communication and collaboration market. Oracle Beehive's extensive feature offerings give it a slight edge, although Kiteworks offers competitive pricing and superior customer support.

Features: Kiteworks focuses on secure file sharing, enhanced data privacy protections, and a user-friendly interface. Oracle Beehive integrates collaboration tools including email, calendaring, and document management into a seamless platform, adding significant value with its unified approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks provides a streamlined deployment process that simplifies installation and is backed by responsive customer service. Oracle Beehive offers extensive features but has a more complicated setup process, potentially posing challenges during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks presents an affordable pricing model leading to a rapid ROI, which appeals to budget-conscious organizations. Oracle Beehive, despite its higher initial costs due to its robust feature set, may result in a delayed ROI, making cost justification necessary for prospective buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Oracle Beehive Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Oracle Beehive

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (29th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (10th)

Oracle Beehive

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

23rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Social Software (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 2.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Beehive is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Content Collaboration Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Kiteworks	2.4%
Oracle Beehive	0.9%
Other	96.7%

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

it_user1127034

President of Operations for Montreal Area at Transitions service conseil

Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability

We will need to implement prototypes in our data warehouse. We will have to implement and to support some different types of files like video, audio, pictures, and non-structured data. So we are working on that. We would like better integration for data security. We will have many partners, eight or nine external partners. We will still use our system to upgrade our warehouse. But with many partners, the data warehouse will not be unique. It will be a distributed data platform. So we would need and we are looking for many services to better manage the integrity and the use of all of the data. We are receiving all these data from trains and trucks that are working on the highways and on the roads. We will have to implement some facilities to adequately use all this data at a really high volume coming from IoT. So we are not choosing that and we will have to implement some services. Right now, we don't have any monitoring. We do have major density and access control, but when a user is in our environment, we do not have the services to really measure what he is doing. I will have to report in three months on the project and its evolution. I don't have the financials and the best practices regarding the financial models with costs and benefits for a major data platform with many partners. We will know what it will cost, but we will have to define some benefits because when I will be at the treasury board asking for a major project, they will ask me what would the benefits from that will be. I'm doing research into best practices. I know that the U.S. government has a platform like the one we want to build. It is a bigger one, from what I understand. I think that the state of California and maybe the state of New York has the type of platform we want to put in place. I would like to present more than just an article. I would like to have a reference model, to really be on target by showing the benefits that are possible down the road.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"Scalability is impressive."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

More Kiteworks pros

"We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well."

"This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated."

Cons

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

More Kiteworks cons

"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 16% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 10% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs Oracle Beehive

Compared 63% of the time

Office 365 vs Oracle Beehive

Compared 37% of the time

More Oracle Beehive Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

January 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Social Software

January 2026

Download Oracle Beehive product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Beehive

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Oracle Beehive provides an integrated set of communication and collaboration services built on a single scalable, secure, enterprise-class platform. Beehive allows users to access their collaborative information through familiar tools while enabling IT to consolidate infrastructure and implement a centrally managed, secure, and compliant collaboration environment built on Oracle technology.

Oracle

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Oracle

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Oracle Beehive

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Oracle Beehive

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Oracle Beehive and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Oracle Beehive report.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.