We performed a comparison between Kenna.VM and ZeroNorth based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Earn 20 points
Prioritize remediation based on empirically calculated risk metrics, and get continuous reports on your risk posture and security team performance.
ZeroNorth is the only company to deliver risk-based vulnerability orchestration across applications and infrastructure. By orchestrating scanning tools across the entire software lifecycle, ZeroNorth provides a comprehensive and continuous view of risk, and reduces costs associated with managing disparate technologies. ZeroNorth empowers customers to rapidly scale application and infrastructure security, while integrating seamlessly into developer environments to simplify and verify remediation.
Kenna.VM is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while ZeroNorth is ranked 36th in Vulnerability Management. Kenna.VM is rated 8.0, while ZeroNorth is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Kenna.VM writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, Kenna.VM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Balbix BreachControl, Qualys VM and Snyk, whereas ZeroNorth is most compared with .
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.