


Radware Alteon and Kemp LoadMaster are leading products in the application delivery controller (ADC) market. Radware Alteon seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and performance optimization, while Kemp LoadMaster excels in ease of deployment and integration with Microsoft applications.
Features: Radware Alteon offers advanced security features, SSL-TLS acceleration for enhanced encryption processing, and robust performance to ensure high application availability. Its flexibility in load balancing and vast customization options cater to diverse application needs. Kemp LoadMaster provides strong stability, built-in templates for easier deployment, and notable support for Microsoft applications with Active Directory integration.
Room for Improvement: Radware Alteon could improve in areas such as automation, DNS capabilities, and live traffic monitoring. More enhancements in self-service features and better scalability options are also necessary. Kemp LoadMaster requires a revamped GUI and better reporting. The addition of advanced analytics and enhanced security features could enhance its enterprise value. Both products need improvements in usability and support efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware Alteon provides adaptable deployment across different environments with scope for improved cloud integration. It is well-regarded for its customer service, despite occasional language barriers and delays. Kemp LoadMaster's deployment is straightforward, fitting well into existing infrastructures. It receives high praise for responsive and effective technical support, though improvements in the user interface are necessary.
Pricing and ROI: Radware Alteon is competitively priced with a flexible GEL licensing model offering good return on investment, particularly in security. Its cost-efficiency is reflected in improved customer satisfaction and service availability. Kemp LoadMaster also offers competitive pricing and substantial value due to its ease of use and flexible licensing, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious buyers with minimal maintenance costs. Both products provide economic benefits over more expensive competitors like F5.
For the small project I was working on, using the basic tier provided a huge improvement at zero cost.
In terms of return on investment with Cloudflare, it costs my time to set them up, but basically once they're set up, it's done.
Cloudflare does not offer hands-on technical support to fix customer problems but rather a self-service model.
I would rate the technical support with Cloudflare as excellent every time I've had to call them.
I have primarily worked not with the tool's customer support but with the product's sales engineers and technical sales engineers, who seem to know their stuff.
We have not received technical support from Kemp LoadMaster without a license.
We never face support issues, and their team resolves any critical issues quickly once they are involved.
There is a dedicated expert answering even the toughest questions.
The customer service and support are excellent.
It is a SaaS tool, but the fact that they have workloads deployed across the world proves that it is a highly scalable tool.
The tool offers very good performance, even during high-traffic periods.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
Kemp LoadMaster is a scalable solution.
It handles peak loads and thousands of concurrent connections without exceeding 10% utilization.
We have it deployed across multiple geographic locations, benefiting from load balancing resiliency.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
The service is very stable with no impacts during high-traffic periods.
With the license purchase afterwards, if it expires, it begins dropping the HTTP traffic, also the DNS traffic.
We've never faced downtime, even during peak transaction hours.
There is minimal downtime, and the solution is quite stable.
There are no difficulties with the deployment of Radware Alteon; it is quite straightforward.
Despite these challenges, overall, Cloudflare remains the preferred solution compared to Azure, AWS CloudFront, and Google Cloud Armor.
Areas like how assessment, discovery, and payload are dealt with and how it all comes into your organization can be considered when trying to make suggestions to Cloudflare for improvements.
There are some performance considerations when it comes to dynamic content that involves fetching data from databases or using APIs.
After that, they said if it was good, we could purchase the license, and while we found it very good, the license cost was too high.
They keep integrating new features that sometimes break our production, but we use clustered systems, so we can test those software releases.
Other OEMs offer free courses and hands-on labs on new technologies and features, which we find useful.
In the future, I would like to see some other security features added, such as DDoS, which is Distributed Denial of Service.
I find it to be cheap.
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
The tool is a premium product, so it is very expensive.
For our solution, it was right in the middle of price performance.
The cost of the Radware solution is reasonable and stable.
The implementation and running costs are quite high.
The most valuable features of the solution are performance and security.
Techniques like minification and image compression reduce the size of assets, leading to better performance and faster user load times.
The solution has been able to compare it to the market, and I think the product has taken great strides in automating quite a bit of things, and they use a lot of AI.
We had some issues in patching management, so we deployed this product for virtual patching, the IPS rule, and it gives us very good results because we have very critical servers.
The product allows us to manage multiple networks and VLANs into a single box and add numerous web services and farms efficiently.
The best feature of Radware Alteon is basically the configuration; how we configure it is very straightforward, and it is very simple to configure.
I find the best features to be the flexibility and ease of use.

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Cloudflare enhances web performance and security with features like CDN caching and DDoS mitigation while providing easy DNS management and intuitive setup through its user-friendly dashboard.
Cloudflare is recognized for its comprehensive web security and performance solutions. Speed improvements are achieved through caching mechanisms and DDoS protection, combining ease of DNS management with flexible page rules. The robust analytics and threat insight tools provide valuable data, assisted by a user-friendly dashboard allowing quick setup and configuration. An API offers dynamic DNS settings ensuring low latency and high performance across the globe.
What are Cloudflare's key features?Cloudflare finds utility across industries for DNS management and defense mechanisms. Its content delivery network assures fast content distribution and fortified security. Businesses integrate features like web application firewalls, load balancing, end-to-end SSL, and zero trust to protect websites from cyber threats while ensuring resilience and reliable performance.
Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.
Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.
Radware Alteon is an advanced network solution offering exceptional load balancing, SSL offloading, and integrated application protection. Its high performance and user-friendly interface make it ideal for enhancing server capacity and reliability in demanding environments.
Radware Alteon enhances performance with robust load balancing, SSL-TLS acceleration, and comprehensive security features. Its automated threat detection and real-time analytics provide crucial insights and mitigation within high-demand scenarios. Users benefit from seamless server and application traffic management along with web application firewall capabilities, ensuring high availability and compliance with security standards. Scalability is supported through strong hardware and ease of integration, although improvements are needed in cloud service automation and interface simplicity. Challenges include response times and live traffic monitoring, with limited resources in support and documentation. Scalability faces constraints due to throughput limitations.
What are the key features of Radware Alteon?Radware Alteon is crucial for industries requiring reliable load balancing across multiple servers and applications. It supports inbound and outbound traffic management, focusing on web application protection and data center security. Businesses in telecommunications, finance, and retail utilize its capabilities for server and link balancing, ensuring adherence to strict security standards with seamless functionality across diverse network environments.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.