We performed a comparison between Kemp LoadMaster and Radware LinkProof based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We needed a Microsoft Threat Management Gateway server replacement solution for a customer and were impressed with the simplified deployment of the Kemp LoadMasters."
"Failover is seamless and our services are rock solid."
"The security features are the most valuable features of this solution."
"Simple to install with good documentation."
"The most beneficial function of using the ADC is to ensure this resiliency."
"The user interface is very easy to work with."
"The old process of manually having to redirect Outlook Web Access traffic and Email traffic to a second server is a thing of the past."
"It is an easy-to-use, user-friendly interface, and you can set up a new VIP in a couple of minutes."
"Provides good performance and scalability."
"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance."
"The performance and stability are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"I really don't like the way the logs are presented in the software."
"Hardware version needs a dual power solution."
"They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product."
"I would like to see more automation and control of overactive and inactive resources. If I could schedule these around our updates then it would be all automated. I would like to set up an automated script to coincide with the scripts I use to update resources and servers."
"They were still in the process of development, and for example, we set it up in a cluster. So it was one logistical unit built out of two physical devices. And the expected behavior, which I know from other devices, will be formed into a logic cluster. It's that you configure one unit. Then you bring the second unit into this cluster with the already configured primary unit. So the secondary box pulls all the configured ones from its neighbor, does everything automatically, and then synchronizes with this primary neighbor. And then it works, like, one logical unit. And this didn't work with the Kemp's initially, where they caused a lot of issues when building up a cluster, so there were some specials on how to set this up. When we built or set them up for the first time and the months afterward with no new software releases, there were a couple of problems, but in the end, they worked fine. So, they developed a lot and learned from what they've responded to, what we responded to them, and what needs fixing."
"It would be helpful if there were a way to incorporate tooltips on the fields so that we don't have to dig through documentation."
"SNMP and/or RESTCONF management, in order to collect many counters, for plotting in a central application need to be improved."
"I think there should be more visual instructions on how to configure advanced features."
"Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market."
"The solution lacks HA configuration."
"Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved."
"Could have more customizations on the dashboard."
"There are certain features I would like to see in the next release."
Kemp LoadMaster is ranked 6th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 48 reviews while Radware LinkProof is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 5 reviews. Kemp LoadMaster is rated 9.4, while Radware LinkProof is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Kemp LoadMaster writes "Reliable, easy to set up, and can increase your security score". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware LinkProof writes "Supports link load balance and has good stability". Kemp LoadMaster is most compared with HAProxy, NGINX Plus, Fortinet FortiADC, Citrix NetScaler and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Radware LinkProof is most compared with Radware Alteon, A10 Networks Thunder ADC, Fortinet FortiADC, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and HAProxy. See our Kemp LoadMaster vs. Radware LinkProof report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.