Kaspersky Small Office Security vs Tanium comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kaspersky and Tanium are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Kaspersky is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.5, while Tanium is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3. Kaspersky holds a 1.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Tanium’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Tanium users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Tanium and Kaspersky Total Security are competing products in the cybersecurity domain. Tanium tends to have an upper hand in pricing and support, while Kaspersky Total Security is recognized for its comprehensive features that justify its price.

Features: Tanium stands out for its endpoint management capabilities, real-time data access, and scalability, making it suitable for large organizations needing vast endpoint oversight. Kaspersky Total Security excels in antivirus protection, secure payment features, and a password manager, appealing to users seeking robust security options.

Room for Improvement: Tanium could improve in simplifying its deployment process, extending support for niche platforms like the Power Platform, and enhancing user accessibility for restricted access scenarios. Kaspersky Total Security could benefit from optimizing resource usage for older systems, expanding its integration with other security tools, and improving customer support availability globally.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky Total Security offers an intuitive deployment process due to its user-friendly design, whereas Tanium may present a steeper learning curve. Tanium's deployment requires technical expertise but is supported by comprehensive customer service, while Kaspersky is more straightforward in setup but may sometimes lack extensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Tanium is perceived to have a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced capabilities and effective return on investment for large enterprises. Kaspersky Total Security offers a more cost-effective solution with immediate security benefits, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. While Tanium may require a larger initial investment, its ROI is advantageous for organizations prioritizing endpoint management.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Tanium Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Tanium

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Small Office Security is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tanium is 2.5%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Tanium	2.5%
Kaspersky Small Office Security	1.1%
Other	92.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Alessandro Spiandore

Proprietario at IL COMPUTER snc

Long-term licensing has provided reliable lightweight protection for commercial customers and maintains strong performance without disrupting existing security tools

Kaspersky Total Security is a lightweight solution that does not slow down Windows. In many years of use for my customers, I have not had any broken software or other problems. Safe Money technology is available in the product, but I do not use it because my customers have other security solutions that intercept malware before Kaspersky on the firewall and networking firewall of LAN. I sell the various solutions of next generation, Optimum, and Advanced through MCP licensing.

Read full review

Sandeepraj Gatla

Dfir Analyst at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Endpoint monitoring has strengthened incident response and provides rapid isolation and forensics

Tanium provides an endpoint which is isolated from the network and environment. We can easily search its logs and history and connect remotely directly to that particular device which has been isolated from the network. We can search for the history and logs, including audit logs and event logs. The complete activity of the user or owner of the device is visible to us. We can see the artifacts of particular USB transfers internally for official use. We can not only connect remotely but also see the device status and how many failures have occurred within the network so far. We can see the IP address, how many times it has changed its IP address, and how many times it was connected to VPN or external VPN or internal VPN and what has been searched while on VPN. We can block the IOCs or IP addresses as well. We can block domains, hashes, SHA values, SHA-256, SHA-1, SHA-5 and MD5. Although I am not completely involved in the automation team, we do have that team and I have worked in some CERT recently. Tanium is more useful while we are in the CERT because most of the times when we are on high alert, Tanium does play a main role for that particular incident or any high case. Tanium is a simple tool and we can easily integrate it to many devices and it is a mandatory tool to secure an endpoint. It is mandatory to give any RDP connection and the tool should be present in the particular device. It is completely mandatory and it is in the policy as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine."

"Cortex XDR features advanced threat detection capabilities."

"The solution helps find bugs, and it is safe to use to prevent attacks by hackers."

"Their XDR agent and their behavioral indicators of compromise (BIOC) are pretty nice. Their managed threat hunting is also pretty nice. They also have WildFire, which is a service for actively looking for malware. It's quite useful."

"The live terminal is probably the best thing ever. It gives you the access to get straight onto any machine."

"Palo Alto Networks Traps improves our security posture and lowers risk by providing next-gen methods to combat against modern threats on all the major platforms."

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable. We chose Traps because it is the only product that we were not able to get anything past."

"Once you become familiar with it, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a more powerful tool and I would say that I prefer it over MDE because it is a stronger tool for me."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It has advanced features for detecting malware and ensuring customer safety."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"I am satisfied with the solution's security features because we have been using it for years."

"Kaspersky Total Security provides a good return on investment by improving data security and reducing costs by sixty percent with its robust security features."

"I respect the solution for its pricing."

"Kaspersky Total Security directly detects if there are any threats on the internet or when I use a USB stick."

"It automatically identifies potential threats in emails, websites, and documents, swiftly blocking or quarantining anything harmful to prevent any damage or infection to my system."

"Kaspersky is reliable because it checks everything before I want to log in."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security pros

"The insights we gain from our endpoints and the management capabilities that Tanium provides have been a boon to our operations and security."

"For incident response tasks, all these tasks can get done in minutes with minimal disruption to the end-user."

"Tanium is a very good product and I would rate it eight or nine out of ten."

"For inventory purposes, it's from one of the best things on the scene, as you can get live inventory."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."

"Tanium is used for endpoint management, specifically patching and configuration management."

"I like the tool's incident response and security patching."

"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."

More Tanium pros

Cons

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"The configuration could be simplified. I would like to see better protection, specifically to protect email applications."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"Cortex does not offer an on-premises solution. However, some customers would prefer not to be on the cloud. It would be ideal if it could offer something on-prem as well."

"There are some limitations on the Traps agents."

"The encryption is not up to the mark."

"The GUI could be improved. It's a little bit cumbersome. It could be more user-friendly."

"The dashboard is the area that needs to improve so that we can have the ability to drill down without having to go elsewhere to verify results."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"There could be an option to upgrade the license online without necessarily installing it physically in the system."

"The solution's automation capabilities is an area where certain improvements are required."

"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."

"The solution’s email protection area should be improved."

"Its interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"The only area for improvement is the price, which is slightly high."

"If data security becomes available for Kaspersky Total Security, it would be a significant advantage."

"The stability of the solution could be improved because we had some issues with the solution on non-Windows laptops."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security cons

"The main issues are the network connection because different customers have issues with their networks. It's difficult implementing this type of solution because the network is the main feature in the architecture for these types of solutions. Tanium could improve by creating some network optimization."

"There are downsides and drawbacks in Tanium, and there is room for improvement from my perspective."

"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."

"There are some bugs in the product. The tool needs to improve in the area of reporting."

"We set a policy to block USB access. The moment a device is being set up on the network, I apply the policy, but it does not come into effect immediately."

"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."

"Tanium’s scalability could be improved."

"When working with Tanium, there are some older devices that haven't been patched for a long time, and certain patches are not included in Tanium. I have to search outside to download patches, create bundles, and then perform the task."

More Tanium cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We purchase the product’s yearly license."

"The product is not expensive."

"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Kaspersky Total Security is not an expensive solution."

"We pay around $30 to $35 for the solution yearly."

"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing is cheap and better than that of Sophos."

"There is a need to renew the license on an annual basis."

More Kaspersky Small Office Security pricing and cost advice

"The solution offers value for money."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Total Security?

The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable, rated at eight out of ten, and all necessary licensing ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Total Security?

Kaspersky Total Security is perfect. The only area for improvement is the price, which is slightly high.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Total Security?

Kaspersky Total Security is used by my commercial customers for security purposes. I do not use parental control beca...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tanium?

While there is always room for improvement, I am pleased with Tanium.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

The primary use case for Tanium ( /products/tanium-reviews ) is compliance, patching, and inventory as part of the co...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tanium?

For smaller companies, Tanium is quite a big investment, and one needs to have a considerable setup to make it econom...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 7% of the time

CatchPulse Pro vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 5% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 4% of the time

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Small Office Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Small Office Security Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 3% of the time

NinjaOne vs Tanium

Compared 3% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2026

Download Kaspersky Small Office Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Tanium

September 2026

Download Tanium product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Tanium Inc Cloud, Tanium XEM

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Kaspersky Total Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity suite offering robust protection through real-time monitoring, vulnerability fixing, and streamlined operations with centralized management.

Known for its lightweight performance and intuitive setup, Kaspersky Total Security effectively blocks threats across emails, websites, and documents. Continuous updates provide strong defenses against malware. Users find value in features like centralized management, which reduces manual workload, and a user-friendly interface. Adjustments can improve encryption, license renewal, anti-malware capabilities, and system stability while minimizing performance impact. Users recommend strengthened email protection, quicker responses to incidents, and enhanced configuration clarity, with flexibility in license upgrades and cost-effectiveness.

What are Kaspersky Total Security’s Key Features?

Vulnerability Fixing: Identifies and patches security gaps.
Real-time Monitoring: Continuous scanning for threats.
Endpoint Protection: Secures all connected devices.
Centralized Management: Simplifies cybersecurity operations.
Intrusion Prevention System: Blocks unauthorized network access.
Antispam and Firewall: Provides robust network safety.

What Benefits Can Users Expect?

Lightweight Performance: Does not slow down devices.
Pricing Efficiency: Offers good value for the cost.
User-Friendly Installation: Easy to deploy across systems.
Reduced Manual Tasks: Streamlines cybersecurity management.
Robust Malware Defense: Continuous updates enhance protection.

Kaspersky Total Security is used in banking systems, where securing internal data systems and enhancing endpoint protection are critical. Businesses leverage its encryption, firewall, and VPN services for comprehensive cybersecurity management. Its versatility supports protection across multiple devices, optimizing internal networks and processes for enhanced security and performance.

Kaspersky

Tanium offers robust endpoint protection, patching, and inventory management, consolidating the functions of tools like BigFix with capabilities in incident response, network security, and cloud or on-premise deployments.

Known for real-time capabilities, Tanium provides detailed analytics, security features, and device management. Users benefit from quick implementation, real-time updates, and patching campaigns. Despite its strengths, integration and custom plugin expansion remain areas to improve, along with data visualization and network optimization. Reporting enhancements and user training could advance its usability, and some UI elements may require updates for clarity and security.

What are the essential features of Tanium?

Detailed Analytics: Provides actionable insights for better decision-making.
Security Capabilities: Offers strong defense measures against threats.
Real-Time Queries: Facilitates immediate information access.
Patch Management: Streamlines software updates across devices.
Device Management: Efficiently handles comprehensive inventory and monitoring tasks.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex IT tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT infrastructure needs.
Integration Flexibility: Merges with existing systems effortlessly.
Real-Time Updates: Ensures current data availability for informed actions.

Tanium's deployment spans industries focusing on endpoint protection and compliance, ensuring reliable device and server management in settings where safety and quick adaptation are critical. Organizations use it for application deployment, compliance checks, and integrating it as an EDR solution, enhancing overall security and operational efficiencies.

Tanium

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Tanium

September 2026

Free Report: Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Tanium

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Tanium and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Small Office Security vs. Tanium report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.