Kandji vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

Kandji and Qualys are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Kandji is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0, while Qualys is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.9. Kandji holds a 0.3% mindshare in VM, compared to Qualys’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kandji users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Kandji

Read 2 Kandji reviews

1,727 Views
259 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

4,977 Views
1,841 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Kandji

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Kandji and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management are competitors in cybersecurity asset management. Kandji seems to excel in ease of use and customer service, while Qualys stands out with its extensive security features.

Features: Kandji focuses on automated device management and intuitive policy settings that aid compliance and IT operations. Its strengths include streamlined setup processes and proactive customer support. Qualys prioritizes advanced vulnerability scanning, comprehensive reporting, and offers deep insights into cybersecurity risks. Kandji's simplicity and automation are contrasted by Qualys's robust security framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kandji offers quick deployment with minimal configuration, complemented by responsive customer service, making it user-friendly for IT teams. Qualys, with its extensive features, has a complex deployment but benefits from thorough documentation that assists in managing the setup process effectively. Kandji's simplicity contrasts with the comprehensive setup of Qualys, offering a trade-off between ease of use and enhanced functionality.

Pricing and ROI: Kandji has appealing pricing with a straightforward cost structure, enhancing ROI by minimizing time on device management. Its immediate cost-effectiveness is evident. Qualys has a higher initial cost, compensated by its in-depth security features and long-term benefits in risk mitigation. Qualys recognizes high ROI potential for those seeking extensive security solutions with an upfront investment, while Kandji ensures immediate financial efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Kandji vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kandji vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,266 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kandji

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Device Management (MDM) (7th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (14th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (31st)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

10th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), Software Supply Chain Security (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Kandji is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	1.4%
Kandji	0.3%
Other	98.3%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2795433

Cloud Ops Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automated updates have strengthened security and save me time on daily device management

In my opinion, the best features Kandji offers are its UI, which is very clean and clear to use, not overly cluttered, allowing me to see the icon of all the different apps that I can install, and when I click on the little icon in my toolbar, it shows me any updates which I am able to install, making it very easy to use. The clean UI and ease of use definitely save me time, probably cutting the time in half for trying to figure out when to install updates myself, because the notifications are pushed to me, which is good since I want to keep my system up to date without interfering with my workflow. Kandji has impacted my organization positively by definitely increasing security because it notifies you when an update is ready to be installed, and if you do not install it within a reasonable time frame, it would automatically install it, which is good, and it probably has saved at least 30% of my time from manually having to look for updates since it just notifies me when the update is ready. Kandji's automatic installation feature ensures our team's compliance or security posture, as it makes sure we are up to date and all on the same version of a particular tool, which is very important for a technical IT team to avoid differences that might affect functionality.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I highly recommend Kandji to others looking into using it since I have not seen any game-breaking issues; it is highly reliable, scalable, improves security, and reduces the time individuals need to spend on system configuration for security updates."

"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."

"I use it primarily with tagging, asset counts, and groups that we can put them in, and we also use it to tell if a device has been merged and seen in Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, so that's beneficial for us too."

"The most valuable feature is the Management sensor, which helps identify gaps in policy agent availability, thereby improving agent utilization."

"Regarding return on investment, I first look at the reality of the environment and the decrease in critical vulnerabilities with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which equals a positive return on investment."

"Qualys CSAM is valuable for providing end-of-life and end-of-sale information. It gives me visibility into the number of products or hardware items that are end-of-life."

"The best features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management include its ability to scan and consider each and every endpoint based on the target we have given. This makes it stand out."

"We have a diverse organization with a robust infrastructure of more than 300,000 assets. By creating unauthorized lists and rules in the Qualys CSAM module, I can block certain software from being used in the organization."

"Getting different kinds of modules and inventory in one solution is good enough."

"The most valuable features of Qualys CSAM include the ability to manage authorized and unauthorized applications efficiently. This feature helps in validating applications and maintaining a secure environment."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Kandji should give open customization."

"They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

"We've received very poor guidance from them, especially after learning several things we need to fix during the Qualys conference."

"The only minor issue is occasionally being redirected to multiple teams, causing slight delays."

"From the user experience perspective, we need a simpler interface and reduced complexity in certain features, particularly with the Qualys Query Language."

"The activity log is terrible."

"Some areas that would be helpful are more comprehensive tagging and the ability to set up better dynamic rules."

"There have been a couple of times where Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management wasn't accessible and I'd reach out to our TAM and they'd say, 'Qualys is down.' They say, 'We'll let you know when it's back up.' Of course, they never let you know when it's back up."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kandji?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that their pricing structure is bucket-based, requiring licenses to be bought in large groups, which is not an issue for my organization due...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kandji?

I have not been involved in the purchase process of Kandji, but I understand it is very Apple-centric and they have very recently come out with support for Windows or Android, although I do not bel...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kandji?

My main use case for Kandji is that within my organization, I have a Mac as my work laptop, and Kandji is used for self-service platforms so that we can download tools, as well as secondly, automat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Kandji

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Kandji

Compared 20% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kandji

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kandji

Compared 13% of the time

Open EDR vs Kandji

Compared 6% of the time

More Kandji Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

February 2026

Download Kandji product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

February 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

Kandji’s automations are a force multiplier. They free your technology team from repetitive tasks, letting you focus energy on more impactful projects. Kandji has purpose-built experiences from setup and app installs to software updates and computer restarts. It’s what your teams expect from a company with high standards. From increased efficiency to lower cost of ownership, your bottom line is our top priority.

Kandji

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

Kandji vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

March 2026

Free Report: Kandji vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Kandji vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kandji vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.