


Prisma Cloud and JupiterOne are competing in the enterprise cloud security solutions category. JupiterOne seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive asset management capabilities.
Features: Prisma Cloud provides robust cloud security with threat protection, compliance monitoring, and a wide range of security practices tailored for cloud operations. JupiterOne provides detailed asset visibility, management, and advanced insights into digital assets and their relationships, which are essential for security investigations and risk management. The key focus for JupiterOne is asset discovery, being a critical aspect over Prisma Cloud's concentration on threat prevention.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma Cloud offers a straightforward deployment model with strong customer support, allowing for seamless integration across various cloud providers. JupiterOne enables rapid API-driven deployment and includes dynamic query functionalities that enhance insight derivation. The main difference is Prisma Cloud's integration support versus JupiterOne's data-driven approach.
Pricing and ROI: Prisma Cloud entails a higher initial setup cost but provides good ROI through its extensive security features. JupiterOne offers a flexible pricing structure focused on asset-centric security that promises enhanced returns. Prisma Cloud delivers value through comprehensive security coverage, while JupiterOne's pricing aligns with its emphasis on precision and asset visibility.
We are able to scan all our assets with less human intervention and achieve overall effective outcomes.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
After implementation, that dropped to about three to four hours, saving nearly eighty percent of manual effort in that area.
With JupiterOne, I have reduced the number of employees needed due to increased automation, which has also led to significant cost savings.
Using JupiterOne has helped me reduce my total time by almost twenty percent.
It eliminates the need for additional hardware, making it a financially and technically sound investment.
There was a cost reduction. That was the benefit that we had visualized while evaluating Prisma Cloud as one of the possible solutions.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
Their team provided dedicated assistance for connecting integrations like AWS and GitHub, which made the first two to three weeks much smoother than expected.
Customer support for JupiterOne is good, and I find it quite strong, especially for enterprise use.
Customer support is responsive, typically answering within less than twenty-four hours of when I ask a question.
They can respond with technical documentation or pass on the case to the next level because it requires the development of a new feature or changing a feature due to a bug.
Anywhere we raise a tech case, they revert back within an hour.
I would give them 10 out of 10.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
It handles diverse daily data, supports multi-cloud environments, and accommodates thousands of users and applications.
Our organization has grown from a few cloud resource accounts to hundreds of accounts and thousands of resources without needing to deploy additional JupiterOne infrastructure.
The scalability of JupiterOne is quite good. It is built to handle enterprise-scale infrastructures with thousands of assets across multiple cloud environments.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
The scalability of Prisma Cloud is good, covering both the front end and the back end.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It has a lot of scanning mechanisms, which are agentless APIs, eBPF, and cloud agents, that are highly reliable.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
We had issues whenever we were downloading the vulnerability report. It did not include all the information.
Once the issues were identified, Palo Alto applied the correct solutions to ensure high availability and scalability.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
Skills development is another important area that needs attention, as teams require training in graph-based query language to effectively handle large transaction datasets.
The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic.
JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts.
Even though documentation was available, it took a while for a new person to understand what integration meant, what will be achieved after the integration, or how the integration needed to be done on the Azure or AWS side.
Having auto Defender upgrades so that we do not have to upgrade Defender manually would be helpful.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
Overall, it is not cheap, but for what it does, it is a good value.
The cost was not on the higher side.
However, its price can be better so that small banks or small organizations can afford it and adopt it to secure their environment and data.
The pricing for Prisma Cloud is high.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
The key feature I rely on most in my daily work is the graph-based asset relationship mapping JupiterOne provides.
The ease of using queries and the new MCP feature has helped me because sometimes I would have difficulty writing the queries, but the AI within the query field in JupiterOne suggests if the query is incorrect and proposes a new query.
One of the best features JupiterOne offers is blast radius, being able to see assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by any cyber incident or to see how some assets communicate with other assets and some do not communicate with other assets.
Its ability to centralize and address security vulnerabilities across these diverse environments makes it a crucial and decisive element within the Prisma Cloud ecosystem.
For CWP, the runtime protection is the most valuable feature. Every tool does vulnerability monitoring through tools such as Qualys, but the additional feature we get here is runtime protection in CWP.
It is as easy as registering a new subscription to AWS, and you start seeing all that data.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 7.6% |
| Qualys TotalCloud | 2.0% |
| JupiterOne | 0.7% |
| Other | 89.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.
JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
What are JupiterOne's key features?In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.
Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.
What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?
What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?
Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.