JupiterOne vs Kandji comparison

Read 18 Kandji reviews

2,558 Views
537 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JupiterOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JupiterOne and Kandji based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed JupiterOne vs. Kandji Report (Updated: April 2026).

Download the complete report

JupiterOne vs. Kandji

April 2026

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JupiterOne

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

51st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (21st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (30th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (5th)

Kandji

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

20th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Device Management (MDM) (3rd), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of JupiterOne is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kandji is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kandji	0.4%
JupiterOne	0.4%
Other	99.2%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Chijioke Okoye

Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Unified asset visibility has improved investigations and now simplifies tracking security assets

There are some features that I have shared with our customer service manager. One of them that is relevant to us at this time is the need for better determination of unified devices. Currently, JupiterOne uses hostname weights, MAC addresses, or IP addresses to tie devices together, but we have actually requested a way for us to make those determinations ourselves. For example, when externally scanning a device using Qualys, internally it gives an IP address or FQDN, while externally it might be different. We want to be able to decide ourselves that these two devices are the same device even when they have different names and IP addresses for external and internal use. The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic. However, I believe more can be done regarding unified devices, and giving users the privilege to tie them together would be a good addition to the platform. One of the other things that interest us in JupiterOne and why we really wanted to use the tool is the compliance feature. We wanted to use it to track our compliance since we are ISO 27001 certified. However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use. Although there are some works in progress to improve the compliance part of the tool, I think if they can get it up to speed, that would be a really good improvement.

Read full review

Cyrus Davis

SysAdmin at a recreational facilities/services company with 11-50 employees

Strong security structure has supported fast Mac and iOS administration with minimal IT effort

One area for improvement for Kandji would be having a bigger suite of applications. I noticed that some of the niche apps our data software firm needs were not in the regular library. We were able to use the custom app feature to create those apps ourselves, but I would love it if Kandji could expand the library. I also wish Kandji could lock down different ports on MacBooks based on which ones we wanted to shut down, and I hope there is an easier way to sandbox people's bring your own device devices because when we're doing SOC 2, it really wants us to sandbox things so that if someone were to take a device that is not ours, we could delete just our data off there and not theirs. An improvement needed for Kandji would be the ability to remote into devices. I would appreciate something that is really reliable for that without having to buy third-party software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"JupiterOne helps us aggregate all those things on one single platform, allowing us to quickly identify what environment that asset lives in and what type of asset it is."

"The product’s UI is pretty decent and fast."

"I have seen a return on investment with Kandji, as I save time."

"Kandji has positively impacted my organization by providing remote and quick support."

"Kandji has positively impacted my organization because it is very user-friendly, and among the multiple MDM solutions I have used, such as JumpCloud and Intune, Kandji stands out as one of the best for Mac devices."

"After switching to Kandji, we have seen a return on investment, specifically in human resource savings."

"Kandji has positively impacted our organization by making it so we feel confident in our security structure, and we feel confident that we can pass SOC 2 every year because we know that Kandji is doing what it says it's doing."

"The customer support is the best I have ever seen."

"Kandji has positively impacted my organization because it helps us be more secure and enforce compliance."

"Kandji has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to better assist and it allows for a better user experience, a better kind of fleet management."

More Kandji pros

Cons

"You can only write Python queries in Jupiter, not other languages, like, SQL or PySpark."

"However, the compliance module has not worked well, and we have had to continue tracking our compliance manually with the tools we use."

"Kandji should give open customization."

"While I do not have anything specific to add about the features, I do think there is a lack of flexibility in Kandji."

"One way Kandji can be improved is through pricing, as other market providers comparatively have a lower price."

"The Windows part needs a lot of work."

"While it might be on the expensive side compared to Jamf Pro, it is closer in pricing to other MDMs such as Microsoft Intune, which comes with the EMS E3 license, making it potentially pricey for startups, yet a good cost for established enterprises."

"I rated Kandji an eight because the laptop needs to be connected to Wi-Fi to erase it."

"One area for improvement for Kandji would be having a bigger suite of applications."

"Kandji can definitely be improved by the complexity. I feel we cannot necessarily tweak the Blueprints in the ways that we need to or there are just complex one-off situations where we need more customization and more ability to run custom scripts."

More Kandji cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Kandji, which is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JupiterOne?

What is your primary use case for JupiterOne?

Our main use case for JupiterOne is as an asset catalog tool where we document all our assets that are integrated from different platforms such as Device42, Qualys, Microsoft M365, and Defender. We...

What advice do you have for others considering JupiterOne?

JupiterOne has many features. Although none comes to mind almost immediately, I know it often depends on how we are able to write or craft the queries. JupiterOne has been very instrumental to me i...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kandji?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience are good. It is cheap, and we do not encounter any hassle during setup. They help us initially, and after that, we make improvements one by one unt...

What needs improvement with Kandji?

In Kandji, I see a drawback related to the remote wipe function. When we need to wipe a MacBook, sometimes the remote wipe command works, and sometimes it does not. This is a drawback because when ...

What is your primary use case for Kandji?

Kandji is used in our organization to manage all of our Mac devices. Kandji is an MDM tool which we use to manage our devices. For example, we set up our devices and directly enroll them in Kandji ...

AWS Security Hub vs JupiterOne

Comparisons

Axonius vs JupiterOne

Compared 35% of the time

Wiz vs JupiterOne

Compared 18% of the time

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys TotalCloud vs JupiterOne

Compared 9% of the time

Surface Command vs JupiterOne

Compared 7% of the time

More JupiterOne Competitors

Jamf Pro vs Kandji

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Kandji

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kandji

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kandji

Compared 11% of the time

Snow Risk Monitor vs Kandji

Compared 5% of the time

More Kandji Competitors

Product Reports

Download JupiterOne product report

Vulnerability Management

May 2026

Download Kandji product report

May 2026

Overview

JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.

JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

What are JupiterOne's key features?

Automated Asset Discovery: Continually identifies and catalogs assets across cloud environments.
Graph-Based Visualization: Offers an intuitive view of asset relationships and influences within the infrastructure.
Policy Management: Simplifies the creation and enforcement of security policies with pre-built templates.
Compliance Mapping: Maps data to compliance frameworks for streamlined reporting and audits.
Alerting and Notification: Provides customizable alerts to maintain proactive security measures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances visibility and control over cloud assets, reducing risks.
Efficient Risk Management: Supports better decision-making with real-time data analysis.
Cost Savings: Reduces the need for multiple point solutions by centralizing functions.
Time Efficiency: Minimizes manual tasks, allowing teams to focus on core security functions.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs, maintaining performance and efficiency.

In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.

JupiterOne

Kandji offers a comprehensive device management platform, ideal for managing Apple devices. Its intuitive interface and automation streamline device workflows, enhancing security and ease of use.

Kandji stands out with its efficient administration of iOS and Mac devices, featuring a user-friendly interface, exceptional support, and reliable management capabilities. The intuitive blueprinting aids in remote device management, while automated functions streamline workflows. Users benefit from time-saving features like app deployment and updates. Although it could improve its application suite, flexibility, and support for Windows and Android, it remains a favored choice for its ability to manage large-scale environments efficiently, automating updates and securing endpoints. Users appreciate the seamless setup and impactful operational management.

What are the standout features of Kandji?

User Interface: Simplifies app deployment and updates for efficient device management.
Customer Support: Offers quick assistance for seamless device management.
Blueprinting: Enables intuitive and remote management of devices.
Automated Functions: Auto Apps and Self Service enhance security and compliance.
Device Management: Manages large-scale environments with ease.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Saves time in app deployment and updates.
Security: Enhances security and compliance through automated features.
Operational Impact: Positively influences organizational operations through efficient management.

In industries focusing on Apple devices, Kandji proves invaluable. Its application in device administration, app deployment, policy enforcement, and endpoint security makes it a preferred MDM platform, offering solutions tailored to manage device enrollments and enhance security, thus supporting businesses in maintaining streamlined operations.