We performed a comparison between Jira and LiquidPlanner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."We can integrate a lot of tools with the solution."
"The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications."
"There are a lot of different plugins for Jira. Unfortunately, we did not test so many and the big pain point for us is the rigorous handling and the roadmap of Jira. We have a portfolio and structure plugin and we have our story map plugin in Jira"
"It includes by default all the necessary tools for a project manager to work and make their work more efficient."
"Transparency of development projects, as well as approval processes for some business projects, has improved massively."
"Jira has a good reporting system. It also has an API, so we can do all sorts of reporting."
"I've never had a bug or a bug message that I needed to open a ticket for."
"The burndown charts help track projects."
"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."
"The work items structure is not hierarchical and that needs to be changed. It's too flat."
"It lacks features to cover all testing aspects, so we often integrate it with other plugins or tools like X-ray."
"Of course, the price could always be cheaper."
"Could be more stable with more integrations."
"We'd like to use it with non-Agile projects in the future, however, right now, it is a very Agile-focused product."
"Performance is something that can always be improved upon in a feature release. Additionally, it would be a benefit to add Markdown in Jira because sometimes it might be better to describe everything in Markdown because it is a common language structure."
"We would like to see integration between Tempo and Jira."
"The biggest complaint industry-wide about JIRA is they need to purchase additional extensions, such as reporting automation. If they could provide some additional extensions from the initial purchase it would be a huge benefit."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."
Earn 20 points
Jira is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 257 reviews while LiquidPlanner is ranked 35th in Project Management Software. Jira is rated 8.2, while LiquidPlanner is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LiquidPlanner writes "Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas LiquidPlanner is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.