We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In general, the valuable features of the tool are its capabilities concerning dependency reports and task status."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"The workflows are the most valuable feature of the solution, whether for tasks, bugs, or chain requests from the site. I also like the solution's GUI, which is easy to navigate for everyone."
"The graphics and the resolution of the work are very good."
"Jira's Structure, agile, and Kanban boards are helpful. I also like JQuery, which allows you to fetch the relevant set of data. We use JQuery, JQL, and the Structure board a lot. Kanban boards help us monitor daily tasks, and we review the progress using the burndown charts."
"The most valuable feature is that it fits very well into an agile framework, and it is especially helpful with the planning aspects."
"The most valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the ease of use, many developers are familiar with it."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard where we can see all of our projects and apply filters to shortlist those projects."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"We had to use assistance for the initial setup."
"There should be an integration of efforts between the cloud service providers' side and JIRA Portfolio."
"The HR aspect of the solution could be improved."
"An improvement would be if Portfolio were integrated with Office 365."
"Portfolio is easy to scale, but we've had some difficulties with it regarding compliance and support."
"We would love to be able to have direct contact with Atlassian. Currently, they are not working directly with West African countries. We are considering using JIRA Align, but when we contact them, they say that as we are in West Africa, they don't directly work with West Africa."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
