Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

JIRA Portfolio vs OpenText Software Delivery Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
JIRA Portfolio boosts ROI by enhancing project management, collaboration, execution efficiency, and providing agile insights into team activities.
Sentiment score
6.9
OpenText Software Delivery Management promises cost efficiency, reduced resource needs, and enhanced project management with automation and predictive analytics.
The tool provides tracking for projects and activities, with detailed insights into which team members worked on activities and the time invested in each task.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
JIRA Portfolio's support experiences vary, with users reporting both helpful interactions and delays, suggesting improvements in access and speed.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides efficient support with active customer engagement, though some users desire faster communication improvements.
We are satisfied with the support from our provider.
The support was good with no challenges.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
JIRA Portfolio efficiently scales for diverse team sizes, though some users find pricing and licensing complexities challenging.
Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText Software Delivery Management is scalable and efficient, supporting large teams and numerous users with minimal performance issues.
In terms of scalability, I would give JIRA Portfolio a ten out of ten.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
JIRA Portfolio is stable and reliable, receiving high ratings for performance, with minimal issues during cloud updates.
Sentiment score
7.9
OpenText Software Delivery Management is praised for its stability, reliable functionality, supportive services, and high user satisfaction scores.
In comparison to Planisware, it is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

JIRA users seek better reporting, integration, UI simplification, resource management, and improved dashboards with affordable add-ons.
OpenText Software Delivery Management needs testing and integration enhancements, better usability, performance, and flexible features for improved functionality.
Making the report creation process faster and easier with drag-and-drop features would be beneficial.
The setup process for JIRA Portfolio is complex.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find JIRA's Advanced Roadmaps affordable initially, but costs increase with scaling, particularly for additional users or features.
OpenText Software Delivery Management is costly but offers comprehensive features and scalability, potentially offsetting its high initial price.
It is not considered expensive in the market.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
 

Valuable Features

JIRA Portfolio offers integration, customization, and ease of use for effective project management and team progress tracking.
OpenText Software Delivery Management excels in Agile support, integrations, traceability, analytics, and adaptability for streamlined project management.
The reporting feature is comprehensive and easy to use, which aids in planning and forecasting.
The cloud accessibility and quick task creation capabilities make collaborating with the tool a great feature for working with my team.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Portfolio
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of JIRA Portfolio is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
JIRA Portfolio1.2%
OpenText Software Delivery Management2.4%
Other96.4%
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Neeraj Chaudhari - PeerSpot reviewer
Aligns with agile frameworks for streamlined project management
User experience should be more intuitive. Currently, it's not that intuitive. Additionally, a lot of querying and customization is needed for reporting. If there could be some templates out of the box, it would be helpful. Making the report creation process faster and easier with drag-and-drop features would be beneficial.
GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Transportation Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JIRA Portfolio?
The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Portfolio?
I am part of the delivery team and am not exposed to the commercial information. However, from what I understand, JIRA is competitively priced. It is not considered expensive in the market.
What needs improvement with JIRA Portfolio?
The setup process for JIRA Portfolio is complex.
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
 

Also Known As

Portfolio for JIRA
Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about JIRA Portfolio vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.