Jenkins on CentOS 10 vs ReadMe comparison

Read 4 ReadMe reviews

2,170 Views
1,519 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins on CentOS 10

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jenkins on CentOS 10 and ReadMe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AWS Marketplace solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jenkins on CentOS 10 vs. ReadMe Report (Updated: October 2026).

Jenkins on CentOS 10 vs. ReadMe

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins on CentOS 10

Ranking in AWS Marketplace

449th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadMe

Ranking in AWS Marketplace

35th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Lucas Dantas

Fullstack Developer at Not Provided

Automation has accelerated deployments and standardizes pipelines while reducing operational errors

To improve Jenkins on CentOS 10, there are some challenges we ran into, especially when we first started using it. We missed clearer documentation, both for Jenkins as code and for some environment configurations. As a result, a lot of configurations were learned manually through tests with the team. We also missed more stable plugin updates. We had many problems with incompatibility between plugin versions in Jenkins on CentOS 10. What makes those situations challenging is that we had problems starting and restarting the Jenkins on CentOS 10 application when we needed to reuse plugins from the previous version. Once we updated some plugins to the required version, others became incompatible with the current version. It became a cycle where we had to update Jenkins on CentOS 10, the versions of the plugins we used, and the versions of the plugins they depended on, which made configuration and startup quite difficult in some cases.

Read full review

TejaswiniAleti

Member Technical at ADP

Centralized API documentation has improved collaboration and reduces onboarding time

Overall, I have had a positive experience with ReadMe, but there are a few areas where I think it could improve. One is customization. While it is easy to create clean documentation, making deeper UI or layout customizations can be somewhat limiting without additional effort. Having more built-in customization options would help teams tailor the developer portal to their branding and documentation needs. I would also like to see more advanced analytics. It would be useful to have richer insights into which APIs are viewed most frequently, where developers spend the most time, and which document pages generate the most support requests. Those metrics could help us continuously improve our documentation. Another improvement would be the tighter integration with Git-based development workflows. While synchronizing documentation works well, making documentation updates, previews, and reviews even more seamless as part of the pull request process would improve the developer experience. All of these are not major issues. They are enhancements that would make an already solid platform even better. Overall, ReadMe has worked well for our API documentation needs. An additional improvement I would like to see is better support for documentation versioning and change tracking. In enterprise applications, APIs evolve over time, and having more intuitive tools to compare versions and clearly highlight changes would make it easier for both internal teams and external consumers to adopt new API versions. I would also appreciate more built-in collaboration features, such as richer review workflows or commenting capabilities for documentation changes before they are published. That would make it easier for developers, QA teams, and technical writers to review documentation together and keep it accurate. Other than those enhancements, I think ReadMe is an easy-to-use platform that has met our API documentation needs. I do not have any major concerns beyond the improvements I already mentioned.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features Jenkins on CentOS 10 offers in my experience are the automation aspect and CI/CD, which I use a lot."

"Jenkins on CentOS 10 has had a positive impact on my organization by making delivery routines easier, avoiding errors and rework."

"Jenkins on CentOS 10 gives back a lot of time, allowing me to work with my colleagues on other tasks and make better use of their abilities."

"Jenkins on CentOS 10 is the main orchestrator that currently helps us ensure, in an automated way, the quality of the product we are delivering."

"Jenkins on CentOS 10 has impacted us positively, mainly because of the open-source nature, and we can customize it to run parallel jobs to reduce the amount of time taken for deployments, reducing it by approximately 40%."

"The Pipeline as Code aspect I mentioned is the most useful feature for us."

"Jenkins on CentOS 10 significantly helps my team."

"Jenkins on CentOS 10 is a very good tool for DevOps because it is an established tool with strong CI/CD capabilities."

More Jenkins on CentOS 10 pros

"Previously, our documentation was split up, but now it is unified through ReadMe, which gives a clear overview and is very easy to navigate, acting as a single source of truth for our business and providing more stability."

"With ReadMe serving as a clear, self-service developer portal, our partners can now complete their integration in a fraction of the time, which has accelerated project delivery timelines, improved our partner satisfaction, and optimized engineering promises."

"Instead of investing time in documentation, ReadMe can document entire APIs quickly and we can just go and do a review, saving a lot of time instead of spending a couple of days or three days on documentation."

"Overall, if your organization wants to improve the developer experience, reduce repetitive support questions, and provide a centralized and professional API portal, I think ReadMe is a strong choice."

Cons

"In my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, I found Jenkins on CentOS 10 expensive. The configuration is very burdensome, and that requirement is bad."

"Regarding how Jenkins on CentOS 10 can be improved, it is not specific to CentOS 10, but Jenkins is a bit resource-intensive. It consumes significant system resources, especially if there are large codebases running or large projects running, and running it on a server does cost money."

"Stability in Jenkins on CentOS 10 could be enhanced."

"I think the overall performance of Jenkins on CentOS 10 could be improved because it ends up consuming a bit more memory."

"I give Jenkins on CentOS 10 a score of 8 because I see that some plugins are maintained by the community and are not actually supported by Jenkins."

"I think Jenkins on CentOS 10 could be improved with more known features and plugins because we have a lot of plugins in my organization that I do not completely understand, and we face numerous alerts and security notifications that I do not really have knowledge of."

"The plugins in Jenkins on CentOS 10, while really great because of the huge ecosystem, can also be a pain point because you never know how long they will be maintained, and there's a slight instability there; if you depend on some plugin that does an integration with some product and the plugin is not maintained anymore, you're blocked from using the product features that would integrate through the plugin, and it doesn't have high availability natively."

"I believe Jenkins on CentOS 10 can be improved with enhancements such as the Docker image in the Docker container."

More Jenkins on CentOS 10 cons

"ReadMe is a software-as-a-service offering only, and there is no way to self-host ReadMe."

"We could probably have more advanced analytics, multi-domain support, or something similar, and advanced access controls."

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate ReadMe overall as eight out of ten. I choose eight out of ten because it is a very strict platform with limited customization."

"One is customization. While it is easy to create clean documentation, making deeper UI or layout customizations can be somewhat limiting without additional effort."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

42%

Healthcare Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Jenkins on CentOS 10?

Jenkins on CentOS 10 is somewhat dated when compared to other pipelines. I would suggest improving the build performance and using distributed agents instead of running every build on the controlle...

What is your primary use case for Jenkins on CentOS 10?

For Jenkins on CentOS 10, we are mostly using it as a CI/CD pipeline to deploy our traditional applications on our healthcare platform.

What advice do you have for others considering Jenkins on CentOS 10?

I would rate Jenkins on CentOS 10 overall as an eight on a scale of one to ten. From my perspective, Jenkins on CentOS 10 has both advantages and disadvantages. Based on that consideration, I chose...

What needs improvement with ReadMe?

ReadMe is a very new tool and I have not used it much, but what we are doing right now is great, so I do not think there is any improvement needed. One thing is that I think there is some limitatio...

What is your primary use case for ReadMe?

Our main use case for ReadMe is that we will be having a lot of APIs and we wanted to document them very well. We were using Swagger, but ReadMe provides more interactive API documentation with goo...

What advice do you have for others considering ReadMe?

ReadMe is deployed in our organization in a dev environment where we do testing and documentation. We use it in a dev environment which is only accessible for our organization. We use Azure as our ...

Comparisons

No data available

Playvox WFM vs ReadMe

Compared 100% of the time

Product Reports

AWS Marketplace

Download Jenkins on CentOS 10 product report

Download ReadMe product report

Overview

Jenkins on CentOS 10 provides a robust continuous integration and continuous delivery platform, ideal for automating software builds and deployments with high efficiency and reliability.

With Jenkins on CentOS 10, developers enjoy a powerful and flexible platform that automates the software development process. It offers seamless integration with various tools and frameworks, making it suitable for managing complex projects. The stability of CentOS 10 as a host operating system ensures long-term support and security, crucial for enterprise environments. Jenkins facilitates fast feedback on code changes, enhancing team productivity and reducing errors in production environments.

What are the key features of Jenkins on CentOS 10?

Extensibility: Supports numerous plugins that extend its capabilities to meet unique project needs.
Distributed Builds: Speeds up the process by distributing build tasks across multiple nodes.
Pipeline as Code: Enables writing pipelines in Groovy through a simple DSL, supporting continuous delivery.
Rich Ecosystem: Compatible with a wide range of developer tools for integration and deployment.
Automated Testing: Integrates testing frameworks to automatically verify build stability.

What benefits can users expect from Jenkins on CentOS 10?

Scalability: Easily scales to accommodate larger teams and more complex projects.
Cost Savings: Free and open-source, reducing licensing costs compared to proprietary software.
Efficiency: Streamlines workflows, improving developer productivity and software quality.
Security: Strong security features protect against vulnerabilities, safeguarding assets.
Community Support: Strong community and documentation provide resources for troubleshooting and optimization.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, Jenkins on CentOS 10 is implemented to automate workflows, enhancing collaboration and ensuring reliability in high-stakes environments. Its integration capability allows businesses to continually innovate without compromising on security or performance, making it an ideal choice for projects where consistency and long-term support are priorities.

Supported Images

ReadMe facilitates seamless integration of complex technical documentation into service platforms. With its intuitive interface, ReadMe enhances documentation creation and interaction by enabling real-time collaboration and dynamic content presentation.

ReadMe empowers development teams by offering a dynamic platform for creating, managing, and sharing intricate technical documentation. Its capabilities cater to the needs of teams seeking to improve communication and streamline documentation processes, making it easier to maintain and update as projects evolve. ReadMe encourages collaboration across teams, paving the way for transparent information exchange and efficient workflows.

What are the key features of ReadMe?

Interactive Documentation: Enables creation of engaging technical documents with interactive elements for enhanced clarity.
Real-time Collaboration: Allows team members to work simultaneously, keeping documentation accurate and up-to-date.
API Explorer: Facilitates API testing and integration within the documentation platform itself.
Dynamic Content: Supports the inclusion of live components and dynamic data display, enriching user engagement.

What benefits or ROI should users consider when evaluating ReadMe?

Improved Communication: Enhance collaboration among development teams through shared documentation.
Time Efficiency: Streamline the documentation process, reducing time spent on maintenance and updates.
Enhanced User Engagement: Interactive and dynamic features lead to a richer, more engaging experience for users.
Scalable Integration: Easily adapt to the growing needs of complex projects without compromising documentation quality.

Industries implementing ReadMe benefit from its adaptable documentation processes, which are crucial in sectors such as software development and IT services. These industries leverage its capabilities to efficiently manage and update API documents, ensuring teams can swiftly respond to technological changes and client requirements, ultimately improving service delivery and reducing time to market.

Jenkins on CentOS 10 vs. ReadMe