"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"The solution is stable."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 14 reviews while SYSPRO is ranked 22nd in ERP with 1 review. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.4, while SYSPRO is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Offers a variety of features, easy to use and understand, reasonably priced, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SYSPRO writes "A great choice for straight manufacturing, but not suitable for complex manufacturing models". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP ERP, Oracle ERP Cloud and NetSuite ERP, whereas SYSPRO is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, NetSuite ERP and SAP Business ByDesign.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
