Nintex Process Platform and JAMS compete in the automation solutions category. Nintex holds the upper hand in scalability and workflow integrations with Microsoft products, while JAMS excels in scheduling capabilities.
Features: Nintex is known for its scalability, workflow automation, and seamless integration with Microsoft products like SharePoint and Office 365. It enables the creation of workflows without extensive coding and is recognized for its user-friendly interface. JAMS offers robust scheduling capabilities, handling complex processes efficiently with minimal human intervention. It integrates well with task management systems and is effective in monitoring and exception handling.
Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance its logging, error reporting, and AI integration. Users have noted form functionality issues and limitations on platforms like Office 365. JAMS would benefit from improved search capabilities, better documentation, and a more intuitive user interface. Users suggest enhancements in browser-based functionality and support for custom execution methods.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex and JAMS offer flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud solutions. While Nintex's customer service is seen as satisfactory, some express concerns over the speed and efficiency of technical support. JAMS receives praise for its technical support, though improvements in desk efficiency and support documentation are suggested.
Pricing and ROI: Nintex is considered expensive, offering significant value and ROI for larger enterprises with a comprehensive feature set and a consumption-based licensing model. JAMS is viewed as cost-effective, especially for scheduling needs, with flexible licensing in large environments. Both platforms show positive ROI, improving operational efficiency, but JAMS is noted for its affordability.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
JAMS offers efficient automation and scheduling with strong capabilities in planning, dependency management, and multi-platform support. Its intuitive interface and robust tools assist in managing complex workflows for enhanced resource allocation.
JAMS stands out for its blend of automation and scheduling capabilities, making it suitable for handling complex workflows across platforms. Its features such as batch scheduling, natural language scheduling, and interactive agents promote seamless integration with other tools like PowerShell. The focus on metrics and notifications ensures users are informed about operational efficiency enhancements. While JAMS is effective in many areas, users report a need for improved simulation for termination processes and a more intuitive client setup. They see potential in enhanced search functions, better exception handling, and greater transparency in custom execution. The current setup challenges like disappearing options and mobile accessibility can affect user satisfaction. Including a fully web-based client and improving documentation could add value.
What are JAMS' key features?
What benefits should users consider?
Organizations using JAMS for workflow and batch job automation leverage its capabilities for SSIS, SQL procedures, and Python scripts. JAMS supports file automation and managed file transfers across environments like AWS and Azure. Users employ JAMS for data management, reporting, and integration tasks, including handling holiday-aware scheduling for improved task coordination.
Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.
Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.
What are some key features?Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.