Nintex Process Platform and JAMS are both contenders in the automation and workflow management space. Nintex has an advantage with its integration capabilities and ease of use for developing workflows, while JAMS is preferred for its handling of complex scheduling and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Nintex Process Platform offers seamless integration with SharePoint, providing tools like SmartObjects and SmartForms that enable users to create workflows without coding. JAMS stands out with its ability to handle complex scheduling requirements, extensive automation features, and powerful monitoring and exception handling capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Nintex could improve its logging and notifications, integration with AI and RPA, and enhance its form features for non-SharePoint workflows. Users mention challenges with K2's management section and its SharePoint dependency. JAMS could refine its user interface, improve search capabilities, and offer a more comprehensive web-based client. Users also suggest better documentation and support for custom development.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex and JAMS both offer multiple deployment models, including on-premises and cloud options, with JAMS providing a comprehensive approach with hybrid and private cloud options. Nintex receives praise for its global 24/7 support, although feedback on responsiveness is mixed. JAMS offers effective support but could improve its online documentation for smoother implementations.
Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform's pricing is considered high, with a switch to a consumption model potentially increasing costs for some users, although many find the ROI justifies the expense. JAMS is recognized for its fair pricing and flexible licensing models, offering significant cost savings, particularly for businesses with large-scale environments, and both platforms report positive ROI from time savings and operational efficiencies.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
JAMS | 2.1% |
Nintex Process Platform | 0.3% |
Other | 97.6% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 11 |
Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
Large Enterprise | 18 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 17 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 24 |
JAMS offers efficient automation and scheduling with strong capabilities in planning, dependency management, and multi-platform support. Its intuitive interface and robust tools assist in managing complex workflows for enhanced resource allocation.
JAMS stands out for its blend of automation and scheduling capabilities, making it suitable for handling complex workflows across platforms. Its features such as batch scheduling, natural language scheduling, and interactive agents promote seamless integration with other tools like PowerShell. The focus on metrics and notifications ensures users are informed about operational efficiency enhancements. While JAMS is effective in many areas, users report a need for improved simulation for termination processes and a more intuitive client setup. They see potential in enhanced search functions, better exception handling, and greater transparency in custom execution. The current setup challenges like disappearing options and mobile accessibility can affect user satisfaction. Including a fully web-based client and improving documentation could add value.
What are JAMS' key features?
What benefits should users consider?
Organizations using JAMS for workflow and batch job automation leverage its capabilities for SSIS, SQL procedures, and Python scripts. JAMS supports file automation and managed file transfers across environments like AWS and Azure. Users employ JAMS for data management, reporting, and integration tasks, including handling holiday-aware scheduling for improved task coordination.
Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.
Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.
What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.