Jamf Protect vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comparison

JAMF and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. JAMF is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.4, while Broadcom is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.3. JAMF holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JAMF users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Jamf Protect

Read 10 Jamf Protect reviews

1,103 Views
500 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Read 30 Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise reviews

994 Views
740 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Jamf Protect

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise and Jamf Protect compete in the endpoint protection category. Symantec appears to have the upper hand in terms of support and flexibility, while Jamf is highly effective for Apple devices.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise offers comprehensive threat protection, advanced malware detection, and response tools. Jamf Protect provides deep integration with macOS and iOS, real-time threat detection, and compliance monitoring for Apple devices, making it a unique solution for businesses using Apple products.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise could improve its performance and reduce resource consumption. Jamf Protect could benefit from broader platform support beyond Apple devices. Symantec needs optimization improvements, while Jamf needs expanded compatibility to be more universally applicable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise generally receives favorable reviews for its deployment process and customer support, although some users report a steep learning curve. Jamf Protect is praised for its seamless deployment within Apple ecosystems and responsive customer service, though it can be challenging to integrate into non-Apple environments.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is considered reasonably priced, with good ROI due to its extensive feature set. Jamf Protect, while potentially more expensive, is seen as worth the cost for organizations deeply invested in Apple infrastructure, delivering high ROI through its specialized functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Jamf Protect vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jamf Protect

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

30th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Endpoint Security ...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Jamf Protect is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Arunachalam S.

Technical Specialist at Brilyant IT Solutions

Offers good monitoring features but needs to improve the support services offered

The tool's drawback is that it fails to offer support for Linux. The XDR and licensing parts of the tool are also areas of concern where improvements are required. XDR is for extensive detection and range of response. Jamf relies on signature-based access. If it is a known signature that just protects our devices, it is a kind of threat isolation. The tool does have behavioral analysis, but as the severity becomes less, the system gets loaded. It is not the same with CrowdStrike as it has a variety of strategies and is a fully cloud-native tool, which helps it to make sure it is a leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant. CrowdStrike goes with its set of practicalities. The kind of threat intelligence CrowdStrike follows is really expensive. With CrowdStrike, we can see which factors have been targeted in our organization. If we know our enemy, then it becomes so easy to cover up with the defense mechanism. The features in CrowdStrike get lagged when used with Jamf Protect. With Jamf Protect, there is a need to improve the security it offers.

Read full review

Intekhab Ahmad.

Senior System and cyber security administration at Tankeenhr

A product that offers good threat detection capabilities to its users

The product has improved my company through its area of threat detection. The other applications use the same engine as Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise does not have a set of 100 percent useful things in the tool. Sometimes, a user may know that a file system does not contain any viruses, but it is labeled as a virus by Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, making it an issue for users. The aforementioned problem prompts me to contact the product support team via email so that my company can get some help dealing with such problems. I would say that my experience with deploying the product across multiple devices in my company is not tough and can be easy, especially if you have domain environments. The feature of the product that is the most effective for threat prevention stems from the fact that the tool provides updates. The main problem with the solution is that a user has to do the updates manually, so at times, the product is not useful, especially when the machine has to be shut down for updates when new viruses are introduced on the market. I rate the solution's ease of use and administration a seven and a half out of ten. I suggest that those who plan to buy the solution periodically update the product, especially in the area of the virus engine. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We mainly use Jamf Protect to protect staff computers from malware and antivirus."

"Jamf Protect is a security product that helps us with CIS benchmarks and threat prevention."

"Jamf Protect searches incoming and outgoing traffic for malware to monitor the network for security."

"I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Jamf Protect's most effective features for threat detection include managing devices and applications, deploying and upgrading the OS, and its overall security features."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and as simple as CrowdStrike."

"The quick updates are really good. If a new OS update drops today, I'll have the Jamf Protect update within a few hours. It's also compatible with all Mac OS versions, and there's zero lag or performance impact."

"The behavioral detection is valuable."

More Jamf Protect pros

"We rely on Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise to safeguard our computer systems from malware. Occasionally, we have encountered issues related to antivirus or malware, but overall, the application has been instrumental in addressing these concerns."

"It doesn't require an on-premises server to manage it. It allows us to monitor the machine to check if it is up-to-date and not lagging."

"The monitoring and reporting features are pretty awesome."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is a simple solution to implement. It took us half a day to complete the process."

"Endpoint protection solution with machine learning, device control, and application control features. It is scalable and stable."

"Managing the dashboard is straightforward and efficient. I appreciate the convenience of accessing all alerts in one place and find configuring policies to be a simple process. Creating and deploying policies to agents is easily accomplished, and the communication between agents and servers is effectively implemented. These aspects are what I find favorable about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise."

"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is the application. Additionally, they are adding features frequently."

"The solution is useful for endpoint protection."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pros

Cons

"The dependency on Jamf Pro or SIEM or SOAR for some automations and integrations could be reduced."

"Jamf Protect protects just Mac devices, and we would love to have one solution for other platforms and not just Mac devices."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The tool's drawback is that it fails to offer support for Linux."

"The scope of improvement will fall under the support hierarchy that the tool offers to the latest version that Apple derives for any of the latest operating systems to launch."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"The solution's integration with other tools is slow."

"Beginners need initial training."

More Jamf Protect cons

"It could be more responsive and have fewer delays."

"The product's security features could be improved - it is still possible for hackers to penetrate your servers even when using it."

"When we asked the support team to relicense the original piece, the team ghosted us."

"Symantec should revamp its graphical user interface."

"The solution could always be more stable and more user-friendly."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise should focus on cloud security with Microsoft Azure or Amazon AWS rather than having their standard solution."

"I don't see any specific areas for improvement. They are knowledgeable about advanced solutions, so no suggestions from my end. Maybe there are minor enhancements, like improving UI features or dashboards, but overall, the product is well-designed. As for additional features, I hope they incorporate Kipops, specifically AI functionality, in the next release of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise."

"The solution's browser protection in Chrome needs to be improved, as it's the most troublesome aspect of the tool. I have two devices where the browser protection failed, an issue that has yet to be fixed for two months. When updates occur, the client restarts, and the browser protection for Chrome malfunctions. Broadcom needs to improve their ability to hijack a browser session to filter web traffic because that's important, as well as site blocking. This element is missing in the product; most companies have firewalls with web content filtering to prevent employees from accessing specific sites."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"Jamf Protect costs double the price that we were paying before."

"It's significantly cheaper than other options like ApexOne."

"Jamf Protect is an expensive solution."

"The licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"The product is not an averagely priced tool."

"If you have a variety of different endpoints, including heavily protected endpoints and some endpoints that are in the field, Symantec allows you to apply different licensing so you don't have to put everything under Endpoint Complete."

"The solution's license is very expensive."

"We have Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise, and it's very competitively priced. However, there is a considerable jump in price for upgrading to the EDR, so that's more compatible with enterprise-level organizations."

"The product is not very expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is expensive. When compared to other solutions they should reduce the price."

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive, meaning it is an average-priced solution."

"I would rate it a seven, indicating a satisfactory and moderate level. Despite being somewhat on the expensive side, it aligns with our long-standing relationship with Symantec, and we find it acceptable."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Jamf Protect?

Jamf Protect searches incoming and outgoing traffic for malware to monitor the network for security.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Protect?

The product is not an averagely priced tool. If the organization is fully on Apple's fleet, they can consider Jamf Protect, but it is quite costly. Jamf Protect is costly compared with any other so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jamf Protect?

The dependency on Jamf Pro or SIEM or SOAR for some automations and integrations could be reduced. In-built automation and remediation of behavior-based threats would be beneficial enhancements.

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

The tool is a secure and stable workstation for checking antivirus. The alerting feature helps us see alerts and is easy to control. The main benefit we derive from using Symantec Endpoint Security...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

The tool needs to improve its dashboard.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

We use the solution for all endpoint systems.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Jamf Protect

Compared 56% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 15% of the time

Tanium vs Jamf Protect

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs Jamf Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Jamf Protect

Compared 5% of the time

More Jamf Protect Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 74% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect

June 2025

Download Jamf Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

May 2025

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise report

Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise product report

Overview

Jamf Protect provides comprehensive security for Apple devices, aiding in malware protection, threat prevention, CIS benchmarks, and USB blockages while supporting local accounts and password sync.

Designed for managing Apple devices, Jamf Protect offers robust security features, such as malware detection and prevention, unauthorized data transfer blocks, and enhanced security profiles. It allows seamless deployment and upgrades of applications, coupled with efficient endpoint management. The tool ensures zero performance impact while providing real-time notifications for password updates and comprehensive data protection across all Mac OS versions.

What are Jamf Protect's most notable features?

Quick OS Updates: Ensures devices are always up-to-date with the latest OS releases.
Zero Performance Impact: Doesn’t strain CPU resources, ensuring smooth laptop performance.
Real-time Notifications: Delivers timely alerts about password updates and security threats.
Comprehensive Data Protection: Guards against malware, data transfers, and external drive threats.
Zero-touch Integration: Simplifies deployment and device management without manual intervention.

What benefits do users see in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Significant reduction in malware and unauthorized data transfer incidents.
Efficiency: Streamlined device management and application deployment save time.
Performance: Lightweight design ensures devices run smoothly without slowing down.
Proactive Threat Detection: Early detection and prevention of potential threats safeguard data integrity.

Industries such as education, healthcare, and finance leverage Jamf Protect to maintain stringent security standards, streamline application deployment, and ensure devices meet compliance requirements. They benefit from real-time threat alerts, comprehensive data protection, and zero-touch integration, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

JAMF

Endpoint Security Enterprise focuses on advanced prevention for traditional endpoints and modern mobile devices. To include attack surface reduction capabilities and detection and response technologies, check out Endpoint Security Complete.

Broadcom

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

June 2025

Free Report: Jamf Protect vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Jamf Protect vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jamf Protect vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.