Infraon IMS vs Statseeker comparison

EverestIMS and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. EverestIMS is ranked #84, while Techniche is ranked #76. EverestIMS holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

2,377 Views
1,379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

2,072 Views
1,989 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Infraon IMS compete in the network monitoring domain. Infraon IMS often takes the lead due to its scalability and comprehensive features, appealing to larger enterprises despite higher costs.

Features: Statseeker offers real-time data collection, efficient resource utilization, and minimal hardware requirements. Infraon IMS provides integrated ITSM capabilities, a comprehensive feature set, and scalability for larger operations.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its scalability, offer more comprehensive incident management features, and expand integrations with other tools. Infraon IMS might simplify its initial setup, reduce costs for smaller enterprises, and improve its user interface for ease of navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is known for straightforward deployment and low-maintenance operations, appealing to those preferring quick setup. Infraon IMS, with a more complex setup process, offers dedicated customer support to facilitate deployment and ongoing operation.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker is recognized for lower setup costs, attractive to small and medium-sized enterprises focusing on cost-effectiveness. Infraon IMS requires higher upfront investment but promises significant long-term ROI through advanced features and scalability, justifying the higher initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. Statseeker

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (33rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (57th), Cloud Monitoring Software (47th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

76th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Statseeker	0.5%
Infraon IMS	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable product; after the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much, and all systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"Overall, it's a wonderful one-stop ITSM solution for infrastructure."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

More Infraon IMS pros

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"If you need a product that's able to monitor all the ports in your environment or all the ports that you want, this is a great product to use."

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"I believe Statseeker has reduced the complexity of our network monitoring, providing real-time alerts and on-demand graphs that improve our network availability."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"Statseeker helps reduce the complexity of our network monitoring because it's real-time, or somewhat real-time, so we're able to see stuff quickly and react to it."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"In terms of improvements, I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"Technical support could use some improvement in terms of their response times and diagnostic accuracy."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

More Infraon IMS cons

"If it's twice as much, however, then it's already getting a little expensive."

"The interface looks like a Windows 3.1 program. It needs a complete refresh."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 7% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios XI vs Statseeker

Compared 11% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 11% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 8% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

May 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Everest IMS

No data available

Overview

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Statseeker provides comprehensive network monitoring with features such as interface statistics, bandwidth utilization, and robust alerts for outages and temperature issues.

Statseeker offers extensive network visibility, including Traffic Analyzer, historical data access, and a user-friendly dashboard. Its fast data retrieval and detailed reports improve internal communication and monitoring. The platform's scalability, reliability, and low maintenance make it an efficient choice for network monitoring. Areas for improvement include interface design, NetFlow features, and integration with systems like Dynatrace and Cisco ONS. Reporting could be more intuitive, and enhancements in alerting options, documentation, and configuration management are needed.

What are the key features of Statseeker?

Interface Statistics: Provides detailed data on network interfaces and bandwidth utilization.
Traffic Analyzer: Offers precise traffic analysis tools for better network management.
Historical Data Access: Allows users to retrieve past network performance metrics quickly.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Simplifies navigation and access to critical information.
Scalability: Supports network growth without significant changes to existing setup.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Facilitates in-depth understanding of network performance.
Reliable Alerts: Ensures timely identification of issues with responsive ping alerts.
Ease of Maintenance: Reduces the resources required for ongoing management.
Improved Communication: Utilizes reports for effective internal communication.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Empowers users with real-time and historical statistics.

In industries, Statseeker is implemented for tasks like monitoring up/down status, capacity management, and traffic analysis. Users leverage it to generate reports, manage congestion, and track device performance across network layers. Its ability to provide real-time statistics supports evidence-based decisions for upgrades and improves insight into network availability and device utilization.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. Statseeker

April 2026

Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon IMS vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.