No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infracost vs Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infracost
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
43rd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server 2025 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
537th
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Arkajyoti Misra - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
Cloud cost insights have enabled proactive right sizing and predictable infrastructure spend
Infracost is actually a very good product; however, the improvement part could be on the pricing side because the non-free plans are a bit expensive and don't necessarily offset the savings. Feature-wise, I don't have a lot of complaints about this product; it's quite amazing with a good concept. I do think that with AI catching up, tools such as ChatGPT or Codex will be able to do what Infracost does, so they need to come up with something to differentiate their product. I choose that assessment because of the pricing part; if the pricing was much better, since the starter pack is $250 a month, I'm not sure we are always able to save that much every month, making it an expense instead of a saving. The only improvements needed for Infracost are on the pricing part.
Jörg Köhler - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at AvalisNT AG
Modern desktop delivery has become smoother and integration with current clients works reliably
In Switzerland, my clients, particularly in the banking sector, are cautious about moving data to the cloud due to legal concerns about US access. Therefore, some companies prefer keeping their data on premises to avoid compromising security.Currently, I primarily work on-premises, operating exclusively within shared hardware data centers and not utilizing cloud services such as Azure or AWS. We have experimented with Azure for some testing installations, but the overall costs associated with cloud services raise concerns. While we employ cloud solutions for backup, our infrastructure remains on-premises. For the product itself, Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages earns a solid rating of seven or eight from me because it is user-friendly to work with. My main frustration lies in the mandatory updates and newly introduced security features that complicate third-party software operations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to reduce our cloud bill without impacting performance, achieving at least a 20% reduction in the amount we spend on cloud."
"The best feature Infracost offers is that the dashboard is very helpful because it is more visual to all stakeholders."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by helping me reduce my infrastructure cost and review expenses, and I am able to remove all unnecessary infrastructure."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enhancing our engineering team's cost consciousness."
"What I appreciate about Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is the full solution Microsoft provides, especially when it comes to the cloud part and security, with their Microsoft total solutions."
"A significant benefit of Windows Server 2025 is its smoother integration with Windows 11, particularly in network environments."
"The biggest advantage I find in Windows Server 2025 is that it is very user-friendly."
 

Cons

"Infracost could be improved in terms of processing and the user interface, as there are times that these aspects could be enhanced."
"Infracost is actually a very good product; however, the improvement part could be on the pricing side because the non-free plans are a bit expensive and don't necessarily offset the savings."
"I would appreciate some improvements in terms of processing speed, and I would be happy to see a slightly better user interface from my perspective, but everything else is excellent."
"I think Infracost can be improved by connecting native and cloud practices; we could use some tools according to each cloud, but as a service, Infracost is very helpful."
"Regarding security, I do not agree with Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages because I believe Linux is the best for securing servers."
"The changes that Microsoft made with the introduction of Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages did not enhance our security; rather, they made it harder due to uncommunicated security features being activated."
"The main disadvantage of Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is pricing, as customers choose some Linux versions, which are open-source editions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
43%
Transportation Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infracost?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I need to create each resource using the tools as I promote. In many cases, I use Terraform free locally and then Infracost locally in ...
What needs improvement with Infracost?
I think Infracost can be improved by connecting native and cloud practices; we could use some tools according to each cloud, but as a service, Infracost is very helpful. However, in this case, we n...
What is your primary use case for Infracost?
I use Infracost in all my projects. A specific example of how I use Infracost in my projects is that I need to create infrastructure as code using Terraform and then I connect Infracost in the proj...
What needs improvement with Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages?
The main disadvantage of Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is pricing, as customers choose some Linux versions, which are open-source editions. There are some c...
What is your primary use case for Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages?
Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages is mainly used by our client for application hosting. I don't work extensively with the identity management part, but I do...
What advice do you have for others considering Windows Server 2025 (Windows Server 2025) | Support by SupportedImages?
We are working as a partner with Microsoft. We have different customers with various deployment styles, but our focus is mainly on the cloud. We work in majority with enterprise customers as well a...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, Upbound, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.