No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infracost vs Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infracost
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
43rd
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 ...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
512th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Arkajyoti Misra - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
Cloud cost insights have enabled proactive right sizing and predictable infrastructure spend
Infracost is actually a very good product; however, the improvement part could be on the pricing side because the non-free plans are a bit expensive and don't necessarily offset the savings. Feature-wise, I don't have a lot of complaints about this product; it's quite amazing with a good concept. I do think that with AI catching up, tools such as ChatGPT or Codex will be able to do what Infracost does, so they need to come up with something to differentiate their product. I choose that assessment because of the pricing part; if the pricing was much better, since the starter pack is $250 a month, I'm not sure we are always able to save that much every month, making it an expense instead of a saving. The only improvements needed for Infracost are on the pricing part.
reviewer2920476 - PeerSpot reviewer
Development Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Containerization with automation has improved deployment speed and supports efficient DevOps work
One area for improvement would be longer security support and more frequent updates. Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages is stable, but as technology evolves, compatibility with newer versions of Docker, Kubernetes, and other DevOps tools can become a challenge. I would also want to see more lightweight and optimized official Docker images to reduce image size, improve build times, and minimize security vulnerabilities. Better documentation and smoother dependency management could also be more helpful. I would like Canonical to focus more on security updates, vulnerability scanning, and compatibility with modern DevOps tools. For example, smaller or more optimized Docker images would help reduce build time and improve container startup performance. It would also be helpful to have regular updates for commonly used packages and better compatibility with newer Docker and Kubernetes versions. Another important area is clear documentation for upgrading older Ubuntu versions to newer LTS releases without disrupting existing applications. These improvements would make Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages more secure, efficient, and easier to maintain in production. The main areas of improvement that kept my rating at eight instead of a nine or ten would be that there are some newer technologies and dependencies that might have compatibility issues with older packages. Additionally, security maintenance and upgrading to newer LTS versions require additional effort. Overall, it is a good platform, but there is room for improvement in modern tool compatibility, security, and container optimization. A small improvement would be better built-in monitoring and diagnostic tools, making it easier to identify performance issues, memory usage, and resource bottlenecks. It would also be helpful to have similar security patch management, clear upgrade notifications, and more detailed documentation for Docker and Kubernetes compatibility. These small improvements could significantly ease day-to-day system administration and reduce troubleshooting efforts.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature Infracost offers is that the dashboard is very helpful because it is more visual to all stakeholders."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to reduce our cloud bill without impacting performance, achieving at least a 20% reduction in the amount we spend on cloud."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enhancing our engineering team's cost consciousness."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by helping me reduce my infrastructure cost and review expenses, and I am able to remove all unnecessary infrastructure."
"What I like about the product is the license cost and security, as there is no license cost for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages."
"Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages provides a reliable and flexible environment for our day-to-day activities."
 

Cons

"Infracost is actually a very good product; however, the improvement part could be on the pricing side because the non-free plans are a bit expensive and don't necessarily offset the savings."
"I would appreciate some improvements in terms of processing speed, and I would be happy to see a slightly better user interface from my perspective, but everything else is excellent."
"Infracost could be improved in terms of processing and the user interface, as there are times that these aspects could be enhanced."
"I think Infracost can be improved by connecting native and cloud practices; we could use some tools according to each cloud, but as a service, Infracost is very helpful."
"Using open-source, Excel-based tools is not very user-friendly."
"The main areas of improvement that kept my rating at eight instead of a nine or ten would be that there are some newer technologies and dependencies that might have compatibility issues with older packages."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
43%
Transportation Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infracost?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I need to create each resource using the tools as I promote. In many cases, I use Terraform free locally and then Infracost locally in ...
What needs improvement with Infracost?
I think Infracost can be improved by connecting native and cloud practices; we could use some tools according to each cloud, but as a service, Infracost is very helpful. However, in this case, we n...
What is your primary use case for Infracost?
I use Infracost in all my projects. A specific example of how I use Infracost in my projects is that I need to create infrastructure as code using Terraform and then I connect Infracost in the proj...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
What I like about the product is the license cost and security, as there is no license cost for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
Using open-source, Excel-based tools is not very user-friendly. The complexity comes from using full access Microsoft Excel. I believe that I have not found it very friendly to use Microsoft Excel....
What is your primary use case for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages?
Our major use case for Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages is that our ERP is on Ubuntu 18.04 (Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) | Support by SupportedImages.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Dice, Upbound, Tulip Interfaces and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.