Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The feature I found most valuable in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is the mapping. You just drag, and it maps the data. Mapping is very easy, and it's no code. When you migrate data or when the data interaction happens at the source and destination, the challenge is that you'll get different formats. The validation has to be done in the middleware, and the transformation should happen. In Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, it's very easy to do data validation and transformation compared to any other tool.""The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes.""This solution allows you to easily access and make use of information that you have in your on-premises environment.""I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."

More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Pros →

"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code.""The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow.""If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App.""If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous.""The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful.""It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose.""What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process.""It's easy to use, and it's stable."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"The product's pricing is definitely an area where a bit of improvement is needed.""This service could be more cost-effective.""Synchronicity is an area for improvement in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. For example, when you want real-time or immediate response from the solution when multiple technologies are involved, the integration with Informatica Intelligent Cloud isn't seamless, whether it's the MQ, JMS, or BES service, so the connectivity should be improved a bit. The data governance is good, but what's lacking is a demo. For example, if there's a new feature in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, the documentation for that new feature is limited, so if Informatica could give a more complete documentation and more demos, that would be better for the users. Right now, there isn't any issue with any of the features of the solution. It's the new feature awareness or user training, and improved connectivity that I'd like to see in the next version of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services.""There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name."

More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Cons →

"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector.""Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better.""It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors.""The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure.""The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on.""The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services.""Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it.""The solution could add an AI version to make it easier for people."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is something that can be improved."
  • "In terms of the licensing for Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, we had the option of paying based on the number of users and paying based on the volume of data, and we went with the data volume licensing option. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services isn't as expensive as CIG. The pricing for it is okay, so I'm rating it a four out of five in terms of pricing. We did use the email verification and address validation services which weren't part of the contract, so we had to pay additional fees for those services."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive. There is a need to make annual payments towards the license costs attached to the solution, but it is usage-based.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing is definitely an area where a bit of improvement is needed. Improvement in the product's pricing can help Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services gain more customers, especially… more »
    Top Answer:The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.
    Top Answer:If we have P1 and P2 subscriptions, Microsoft will not charge us for creating applications on the Azure portal.
    Ranking
    Views
    548
    Comparisons
    95
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,015
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    5,970
    Comparisons
    2,803
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Informatica IICS, IICS
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is a next generation iPaaS, which is made up of a growing number of data management products. The productivity of the environment is accelerated by a common user experience across all products, the AI/ML-driven intelligence of the CLAIRE™ engine, and a microservices architecture.

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    2-1-1 San Diego, Hastings, AARP , Ace Hardware
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization62%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Retailer4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Marketing Services Firm7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise70%
    Large Enterprise26%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is ranked 14th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 28 reviews. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services writes "Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.