Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Glue vs Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Glue
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (1st)
Informatica Intelligent Clo...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

AWS Glue and Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Glue is designed for Cloud Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 20.5%, down 21.9% compared to last year.
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 0.7% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.
Cloud Data Integration
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Muthuvel Sivaraman - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles a huge volume of data and is serverless, but it can be considered costly by some users
We use Amazon's services to provide technical support for the product. If you want to have support, Oracle and others offer a single support, and other tools have a direct support window. For Amazon, we need to pay 10 percent of my billing amount for the tool to get support services. Whether to raise a support ticket or not is an issue since ten percent is a huge amount. My company ends up using all the options without help from support. It is very difficult for any common man to understand why there is a need to pay ten percent for support. If I find an issue in the product, and I need to get support from AWS to fix it, then I need to pay ten percent of the tool's bill amount to Amazon. AWS is a very tricky tool because everything is evolving nowadays. AWS engineers are getting hired from other places, and even after that, if I am not getting any technical support, then things will be very nasty. There are some good engineers who help users outside the normal support cycle, but it doesn't meet their needs. I rate the technical support a four out of ten.
Argha Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket
There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name. Moreover, the support team could improve by adding things like file transfer status updates. Also, if someone modifies a job and then leaves the company, that shouldn't disrupt the job for active users. It would be better if the job continued to run smoothly regardless of who modified it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our entire use case was very easily handled or solved using this solution."
"The product has a valuable feature for data catalog."
"I appreciate AWS Glue for its cost-effectiveness."
"The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"Glue is a NoSQL-based data ETL tool that has some advantages over IIS and ISAs."
"We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure."
"It is AWS-integrated. There is end-to-end integration with the other AWS services. It is also user-friendly."
"What I like best about AWS Glue is its real-time data backup feature. Last week, there was a production push, and what used to take almost ten days to send out around fifty-six thousand emails now takes only two hours."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services for me is the availability of connectors."
"I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."
"The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes."
"Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services offers a wide variety of services, including Cloud Data Integration, which is akin to a replica of PowerCenter on the cloud. I particularly like the mass ingestion service."
"Customer service and technical support are excellent."
"This solution allows you to easily access and make use of information that you have in your on-premises environment."
"The feature I found most valuable in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is the mapping. You just drag, and it maps the data. Mapping is very easy, and it's no code. When you migrate data or when the data interaction happens at the source and destination, the challenge is that you'll get different formats. The validation has to be done in the middleware, and the transformation should happen. In Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, it's very easy to do data validation and transformation compared to any other tool."
 

Cons

"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Beginners need additional support as it currently lacks some features required for complex transformations, often necessitating custom Python coding."
"I would like to see stable libraries at the moment they are not there."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"The drawbacks associated with the product stem from the fact that, based on the data volume, it can become very costly."
"Improvements in the UI are needed, as it is challenging to understand some functionalities."
"The interface for AWS Glue could improve, they do not put a lot of details. You can write the code, in PySpark or in Scala, which is a big advantage, it is only easy to use for a developer. It will be difficult for new users to enter the cloud environment."
"The cloud version of Informatica, although easier and more advanced than PowerCenter, still requires a deep dive to fix bugs."
"The product's pricing is definitely an area where a bit of improvement is needed."
"Synchronicity is an area for improvement in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. For example, when you want real-time or immediate response from the solution when multiple technologies are involved, the integration with Informatica Intelligent Cloud isn't seamless, whether it's the MQ, JMS, or BES service, so the connectivity should be improved a bit. The data governance is good, but what's lacking is a demo. For example, if there's a new feature in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, the documentation for that new feature is limited, so if Informatica could give a more complete documentation and more demos, that would be better for the users. Right now, there isn't any issue with any of the features of the solution. It's the new feature awareness or user training, and improved connectivity that I'd like to see in the next version of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."
"This service could be more cost-effective."
"The tool is quite good overall, but sometimes the number of modules can be overwhelming. If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial."
"In terms of data volume processing, Intelligent Cloud Services does not match the efficiency of Power Center."
"There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is affordable and there is an option to pay for the solution based on your usage."
"AWS Glue is a high-priced solution that bills the client $150,000 to $250,000 annually."
"Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend."
"I would rate the solution a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, with ten being very expensive. Specifically, I rate its pricing a six out of ten."
"AWS Glue is quite costly, especially for small organizations."
"The pricing is a bit higher than other solutions like Athena and EC2. If the pricing becomes more scaled or flexible, it will be good because you have to pay 44 cents just for one DPU for an hour. If you increase DPUs to 5 or 10, the pricing gets multiplied. There are also some time limits like 0 to 10 minutes or 10 to 20 minutes. If the pricing is according to the minutes, it would be better because you have to limit your job to 10 minutes or 20 minutes."
"The current cost is around forty to fifty thousand a month."
"If you are using the solution for an enterprise business, it will be expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing model is something that can be improved."
"In terms of the licensing for Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, we had the option of paying based on the number of users and paying based on the volume of data, and we went with the data volume licensing option. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services isn't as expensive as CIG. The pricing for it is okay, so I'm rating it a four out of five in terms of pricing. We did use the email verification and address validation services which weren't part of the contract, so we had to pay additional fees for those services."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

SS
Apr 18, 2022
Apr 18, 2022
They both have many features that you will need. AWS Glue will be easier to maintain and integrate because it is a platform on AWS. Informatica is cloud-agnostic. For a large company, you are better off keeping your options open to move to another cloud.
2 out of 3 answers
AS
Aug 16, 2021
@Sandeep Suram,​ can you please elaborate your use case? What exactly are your requirements?
JB
Aug 16, 2021
They both have many features that you will need.  AWS Glue will be easier to maintain and integrate because it is a platform on AWS. Informatica is cloud-agnostic.  For a large company, you are better off keeping your options open to move to another cloud.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
56%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?
AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...
What do you like most about Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services?
The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services?
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is affordable for my specific use cases, with the pricing being rated three or four on a scale where one is very cheap. The affordability may vary based on ho...
What needs improvement with Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services?
The tool is quite good overall, but sometimes the number of modules can be overwhelming. If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Informatica IICS, IICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
2-1-1 San Diego, Hastings, AARP , Ace Hardware
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: March 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.