Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Melissa Data Quality comparison

Informatica and Melissa are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Informatica is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Melissa is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Informatica holds a 10.5% mindshare in DQ, compared to Melissa’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Melissa users who would recommend it.

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Read 185 Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) reviews

20,563 Views
1,851 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Melissa Data Quality

Read 40 Melissa Data Quality reviews

750 Views
405 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Melissa Data Quality

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud and Melissa Data Quality compete in the data management and quality domain. Informatica IDMC has an advantage due to its robust data integration capabilities.

Features: IDMC offers extensive data integration with a variety of connectors and automation tools, AI-driven insights, and flexible scalability. Melissa Data Quality provides precise data verification and cleansing, focusing on address validation, geocoding, and contact data verification.

Room for Improvement: IDMC could enhance its initial cost-effectiveness, simplify setup processes, and expand support for more specialized data validation features. Melissa Data Quality might improve by enhancing its integration capabilities, developing more robust cloud-based features, and offering a wider range of automated data insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDMC supports a cloud-based approach, ensuring efficient integration with multiple platforms and offering strong customer support. Melissa Data Quality offers both on-premises and cloud options, providing personalized customer service despite potentially complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: IDMC is a higher upfront investment with long-term ROI benefits through its scalability and comprehensive features. Melissa Data Quality is more cost-effective initially, offering essential data quality functions at a lower setup cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,837 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Ranking in Data Quality

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

185

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (3rd), Business Process Management (BPM) (10th), Business-to-Business Middleware (5th), API Management (7th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Governance (2nd), Test Data Management (3rd), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (1st), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (2nd), Data Masking (1st), Metadata Management (1st), Test Data Management Services (3rd), Product Information Management (PIM) (1st), Data Observability (2nd)

Melissa Data Quality

Ranking in Data Quality

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Scrubbing Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is 10.5%, down from 21.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Melissa Data Quality is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)	10.5%
Melissa Data Quality	2.7%
Other	86.8%

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

SaurabhGaonshindhe

Principle Cloud Engineer at Sector 125

Modular structure and AI features stream new reporting processes

One of my clients has a requirement; they want to integrate metadata into the process, which means, for example, if I just want to implement a new field into my database, that field needs to be reflected throughout, let's say, 200 mappings. This highlights the need for a data-driven approach. My experience with technical support from Informatica is quite interesting; I would rate it as nine out of ten for Informatica PowerCenter kind of products or the Informatica integration products, because my team can do some hands-on using their free licenses or one-month kind of products. However, for products Master Data Management or related to MDM or Data Governance, there is no way by which we can directly practice, and my team struggles at that point.

Read full review

GaryM

Data Architect at World Vision

SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing

- Scalability is a limitation as it is single threaded. You can bypass this limitation by partitioning your data (say by alphabetic ranges) into multiple dataflows but even within a single dataflow the tool starts to really bog down if you are doing survivorship on a lot of columns. It's just very old technology written that's starting to show its age since it's been fundamentally the same for many years. To stay relavent they will need to replace it with either ADF or SSIS-IR compliant version. - Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. And updating the license is overly complicated. - The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since pretty much all SSIS components are resizable except theirs! This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows. - The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this. - Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship). - It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language. - It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool). - It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool). - Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution. We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows. - Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS. Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component. - They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques. - The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it. When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides increased efficiency while still being user-friendly and easy to operate."

"The most valuable features of the solution are pushdown, optimization, and partitioning, which can be used for frequent data loading, especially when we have a huge data volume in our company."

"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."

"Some of Axon's valuable features include creating your business glossaries, importing DQ rules, and creating change management."

"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."

"The governance process was fully manual before, but Axon helped us configure those processes, giving us more visibility, transparency, and control over the data."

"In the latest version, I like the outlay of the business roles creation. I like seeing that visualization as you're building it, as opposed to going through metatables or XML mappings. We liked that piece, and it makes it more intuitive for the business."

"Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) pros

"Be confident that the scalability and load are not going to be an issue with the services. "

"Gives us the ability to offer an additional resource that other companies do not."

"We are able to more accurately identify valid, and better formatted, data which improves the data we store in our database."

"Address verification ensures our customers get their packages, and we aren’t charged for incomplete address information."

"By validating and parsing the addresses our customers submit to us, we have reduced the number of addressing errors encountered during our processing."

"Allows us to identify cell phones before dialing, and giving us data about callers."

"Provides simplicity, ease of use, combined with overall accuracy of data."

"This tool works better for us than using a batch processing system that we do not have enough control over as each record is being processed."

More Melissa Data Quality pros

Cons

"It is complicated to establish the lineage in EDC using PowerCenter mappings."

"The data discovery isn't that good yet for Salesforce. We have another tool that we use for this. It may be a problem because Salesforce on the cloud."

"The cloud version of Axon is far behind the on-prem, and many of my clients want to go fully to the cloud. However, Axon has to be an on-prem installation. I would like to see their cloud products catch up with their on-prem capabilities."

"The scalability is tough."

"There are also some technical issues sometimes with integrations because clients have a lot of different types of data sources."

"Informatica Axon does not provide complete transparency about the level of detailing you need and the logic used in ETL."

"The integration could be a bit better. The process is something new."

"The only thing that I can imagine that might be improved is how the available transactions verify addresses used. These transactions have a valid end date and must be used within the agreed timeframe."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) cons

"If I had multiple Excel files open and ran Listware it would crash Excel, charge the credits, and not save the results."

"MatchUp is a more complex product and I recommend a test area before upgrading to production. Performance can change from version to version."

"We encounter failed batch processes once in a while, but their team is quick to rectify issues."

"It would be nice if it also had a user interface, as it did in years past."

"One of the problems that we ran into this year was we probably spent over 40 hours finding and trying to drill down to where specific bugs were in the program, which was a tremendous waste of time for us. There were a couple of updates to Windows this year, the program kept crashing. It happened on two different occasions over a period of a few months. Once we told them what the problem was - even though their tech support is great to work with - it literally took probably about two months to fix the issue where we could actually use the program the way we needed to use it."

"It really hasn't given us a phone number for the owner of the property, and that's one thing I'd really like to be getting. Either a phone number or email."

"It will mix up family members at times, so we will change addresses at times that shouldn’t be changed."

"Needs more/better search tools are needed. Also, state and local tax data would be nice."

More Melissa Data Quality cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Informatica MDM's pricetag should come down. They have to cut some costs."

"It is cost effective and an easily accessible tool."

"The price is comparable."

"The price is very high and has become a big concern for our customers who require the solution in order for their business to function smoothly."

"There is no doubt that it is very expensive, but the brand value comes at a cost. Other MDM solutions in the market that haven't proven themselves like Informatica are also pretty expensive. We need to understand that MDM itself is very expensive to implement. So, Informatica is also pretty expensive. I would rate it a two out of five for being pretty expensive."

"I rate Informatica MDM's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"It's pretty high for us. It's more on the higher side, like low to middle high."

"Our customers sometimes are able to negotiate a much better price for Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on their relationship with the vendor."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) pricing and cost advice

"The only complaint that I have towards it is they sell licenses based on a range of usage, and I feel those ranges are too large."

"Depends on situation. We prefer to have data onsite, but some might prefer web access."

"It's affordable."

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"You should have a good idea of the size of your data and the amount of cleansing you will be doing, so you will purchase the appropriate size bundle."

"NCOA address verification was a requirement from USPS to send out the mailers. This was the only option that charged per address which was extremely helpful since we are a small non-profit school."

"Buy a lot more credits than you think you’re going to need."

"Melissa pricing is competitive."

More Melissa Data Quality pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	134

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?

Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...

See all answers

What are the biggest benefits of using Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

When it comes to cloud data integration, this solution can provide you with multiple benefits, including: Overhead reduction by integrating data on any cloud in various ways Effective integration ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 4% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 3% of the time

Reltio Cloud vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 3% of the time

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Competitors

Experian Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 17% of the time

Coheris Spad Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 14% of the time

Anchor Software Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 14% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 11% of the time

Eprentise Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 9% of the time

More Melissa Data Quality Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

October 2025

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) report

Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) product report

Buyer's Guide

Melissa Data Quality

October 2025

Download Melissa Data Quality product report

Also Known As

ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, BPM, Address Verification, Persistent Data Masking, Cloud Test Data Management, PIM, , Enterprise Data Catalog, Data Integration Hub, Cloud Data Integration, Data Quality, Cloud API and App Integration

No data available

Overview

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) integrates data quality, governance, and integration with flexible architecture. It supports multiple domains and a data models repository, delivering AI-enhanced data management across cloud-native platforms.

IDMC provides seamless integration and governance capabilities that support diverse data environments. Its comprehensive suite includes customizable workflows, data profiling, and metadata management. AI features, a data marketplace, and performance scalability enhance data management. While its interface poses challenges, its robust matching and cloud-native integration facilities are essential for complex data ecosystems. Users employ IDMC for connecting systems, ensuring data quality, and supporting data compliance but seek better pre-built rules, services, and improved connectivity, especially with platforms like Salesforce. Licensing, cost, and added AI functionalities are areas for potential refinement.

What are the key features of IDMC?

Data Quality and Integration: Seamless integration ensures data accuracy across platforms.
Metadata Management: Comprehensive metadata management supports data governance.
AI Capabilities: AI features enhance automation and decision-making processes.
Data Marketplace: Facilitates easy access to data across the organization.
Performance Scalability: Scales performance efficiently to meet growing data demands.

What benefits should be expected from IDMC?

Enhanced Data Management: Offers robust tools for data governance and quality.
Improved Integration: Connects disparate systems seamlessly, reducing data silos.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines data processes, potentially reducing operational costs.
Data Compliance: Supports compliance with data privacy regulations.
Agility and Scalability: Adapts quickly to changing data environments.

IDMC is implemented across industries for data integration, metadata management, and governance. Organizations use it to connect systems, migrate data to cloud environments, and maintain data quality. They manage master data and automate business processes, facilitating data lineage and ensuring compliance with privacy regulations.

Informatica

Data Quality Components for SSIS

This suite of data transformations for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) delivers the full spectrum of data quality including data profiling, data verification, data enrichment and data matching. With an intuitive interface and drag/drop capabilities, this powerful toolkit makes it easy to unify data into a single version of the truth for Master Data Management (MDM) success.

Melissa

Sample Customers

The Travel Company, Carbonite

Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

November 2025

Free Report: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.