Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Melissa Data Quality comparison

Informatica and Melissa are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Informatica is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while Melissa is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Informatica holds a 11.7% mindshare in DQ, compared to Melissa’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Melissa users who would recommend it.

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Read 214 Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) reviews

21,584 Views
2,374 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Melissa Data Quality

Read 40 Melissa Data Quality reviews

889 Views
507 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Melissa Data Quality

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) and Melissa Data Quality are direct competitors in the data management and quality domain. IDMC holds a slight edge due to its extensive integration capabilities, offering a more comprehensive suite of data management functions.

Features: IDMC stands out with its extensive integration capabilities, automation of complex data processes, and advanced data governance. Melissa Data Quality excels in data cleansing, address verification, and ensuring data accuracy.

Room for Improvement: IDMC can improve by simplifying its interface for quicker user adoption and enhancing its data cleansing capabilities. It could also offer more flexible pricing options. Melissa might focus on expanding its integration capabilities, enhancing scalability, and improving user interfaces for advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDMC provides seamless deployment with scalable architecture suitable for diverse environments, supported by comprehensive resources. Melissa focuses on straightforward deployment with automated data verification tasks and efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IDMC may involve higher initial setup costs due to its expansive features, providing significant ROI through enhanced data processes. Melissa offers competitively priced solutions ensuring quick ROI with precise data management and fast implementation.

To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Intelligent Dat...

Ranking in Data Quality

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

214

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (6th), Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), API Management (7th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Governance (3rd), Test Data Management (3rd), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (1st), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (2nd), Data Masking (1st), Metadata Management (1st), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd), Test Data Management Services (3rd), Product Information Management (PIM) (1st), Data Observability (1st), AI Data Analysis (1st)

Melissa Data Quality

Ranking in Data Quality

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Scrubbing Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is 11.7%, down from 19.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Melissa Data Quality is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)	11.7%
Melissa Data Quality	2.8%
Other	85.5%

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

Divya-Raj

Sr. Consultant cum Assistant Manager & Offshore Lead at Deloitte

Handles large data volumes effectively and offers competitive pricing

There is a lot of improvement required, as we still face some cache issues most of the time, which is a challenge that we expect to see resolved in the future. Additionally, there is some limitation when we are working with a tool, especially regarding In and Out parameters, and I feel that this aspect should be improved going ahead. We face issues with the API side, as Cloud Application Integration cannot handle large volumes; according to the API page, there is a limitation of 500 records or 500 MB. The AI integrated into the Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services solution is called Application Integration, where we still face challenges when dealing with huge volumes, as previously explained.

Read full review

GaryM

Data Architect at World Vision

SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing

- Scalability is a limitation as it is single threaded. You can bypass this limitation by partitioning your data (say by alphabetic ranges) into multiple dataflows but even within a single dataflow the tool starts to really bog down if you are doing survivorship on a lot of columns. It's just very old technology written that's starting to show its age since it's been fundamentally the same for many years. To stay relavent they will need to replace it with either ADF or SSIS-IR compliant version. - Licensing could be greatly simplified. As soon as a license expires (which is specific to each server) the product stops functioning without prior notice and requires a new license by contacting the vendor. And updating the license is overly complicated. - The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation but that isn't true since pretty much all SSIS components are resizable except theirs! This is just an annoyance but needless impact on productivity when developing new data flows. - The tool needs to provide for incremental matching using the MatchUp for SSIS tool (they provide this for other solutions such as standalone tool and MatchUp web service). We had to code our own incremental logic to work around this. - Tool needs ability to sort mapped columns in the GUI when using advanced survivorship (only allowed when not using column-level survivorship). - It should provide an option for a procedural language (such as C# or VB) for survivor-ship expressions rather than relying on SSIS expression language. - It should provide a more sophisticated ability to concatenate groups of data fields into common blocks of data for advanced survivor-ship prioritization (we do most of this in SQL prior to feeding the data to the tool). - It should provide the ability to only do survivor-ship with no matching (matching is currently required when running data through the tool). - Tool should provide a component similar to BDD to enable the ability to split into multiple thread matches based on data partitions for matching and survivor-ship rather than requiring custom coding a parallel capable solution. We broke down customer data by first letter of last name into ranges of last names so we could run parallel data flows. - Documentation needs to be provided that is specific to MatchUp for SSIS. Most of their wiki pages were written for the web service API MatchUp Object rather than the SSIS component. - They need to update their wiki site documentation as much of it is not kept current. Its also very very basic offering very little in terms of guidelines. For example, the tool is single-threaded so getting great performance requires running multiple parallel data flows or BDD in a data flow which you can figure out on your own but many SSIS practitioners aren't familiar with those techniques. - The tool can hang or crash on rare occasions for unknown reason. Restarting the package resolves the problem. I suspect they have something to do with running on VM (vendor doesn't recommend running on VM) but have no evidence to support it. When it crashes it creates dump file with just vague message saying the executable stopped running.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a more UI-based tool, and the scripting is good."

"Customer service and technical support are excellent."

"I like the connectivity and richness of features for the technical team, the maturity of the product, and that it had a cloud version. There is Informatica Cloud, and it is part of the Informatica Cloud platform."

"The valuable feature is that we can automate the integration part...It is a stable solution."

"Informatica MDM has data quality, mastering the data's capability."

"MDM doesn't require a separate IDQ."

"It's good for tool management, maintaining the golden record of customer status."

"The solution is straightforward."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) pros

"Be confident that the scalability and load are not going to be an issue with the services. "

"There have been tangible benefits in combating fraudulent transactions. The information from Melissa Data is fed straight into our fraud system. This creates efficiency but also removes the need for manual address checks."

"We have only been using this for about two months, but it has sped up our processing significantly. It makes data mining easy and fast. We don't have to spend an entire month gathering correct information on leads. All we need is a list of home addresses, and in minutes we have names and phone numbers to increase our chance of these leads becoming customers."

"We are able to more accurately identify valid, and better formatted, data which improves the data we store in our database."

"We are able to send out client mailings with the most accurate addresses possible."

"We mainly communicate with our customers via email, so we primarily use it to find a phone number so we can contact them more efficiently. This allows us to talk to them and resolve their issues much more quickly."

"SSIS integration."

"Address parsing. Our other software does not have this functionality."

More Melissa Data Quality pros

Cons

"One thing Informatica could improve is the way IPUs are used. Each customer purchases a certain amount of IPUs per month, but you can use more or less than that defined quantity. The only problem is if you don't use the all your IPUs, they don't carry over into the next month. I think customers should have the ability to transfer unused IPUs into the next month or year. This improvement could help give customers more flexibility, especially since cloud solutions need flexibility in how we use and pay for them."

"From multiple masters that are there in Informatica MDM, we can improve the financials."

"We'd like to see the microservices, which don't run yet because the solution is not yet fully cloud-based."

"The product interface could be improved to be more intuitive."

"Informatica Axon needs more integration connectors so that it can connect to systems and different kinds of datasets."

"It needs to be a little more intuitive but it’s really not bad."

"Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value."

"Database access is highly restricted particularly if you're using the cloud version."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) cons

"The SSIS component setup seems a little klunky."

"One of the problems that we ran into this year was we probably spent over 40 hours finding and trying to drill down to where specific bugs were in the program, which was a tremendous waste of time for us. There were a couple of updates to Windows this year, the program kept crashing. It happened on two different occasions over a period of a few months. Once we told them what the problem was - even though their tech support is great to work with - it literally took probably about two months to fix the issue where we could actually use the program the way we needed to use it."

"It could always be cheaper."

"Needs better email append coverage (but every vendor struggles with this)."

"Needs to validate more addresses accurately."

"There are some companies out there using Google or other sources to check / confirm if addresses are residential. If Melissa is not doing this, that could be an improvement."

"Speed of delivery/ease of use. They advertise a 24-hour, next business day turn time on data annotation, but I’ve found it is usually closer to 72 hours. This is still excellent, just make sure you add in the appropriate fluff to your delivery timelines."

"Pricing is based on tiers, with each tier capped at a specified number of records processed. Once you go over the cap at one tier, you are automatically bumped to the next tier. However, they seem to count failed batch processes so it’s good to keep track of the number of records sent. They’ll fix the count when notified, but their system fails to detect actual successful processes versus failed processes."

More Melissa Data Quality cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Informatica Cloud Data Integration could be reduced."

"I rate Informatica MDM's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"So, there are plans for licensing. There are subscription-based and usage-based licenses. Also, there are licenses for exceptional analytics, etc. In short, there are different models of licensing for every enterprise."

"The product has a high price point."

"The product is highly-priced."

"Informatica MDM is very expensive. Apart from licensing fees, they have broken down their products into multiple products, and they charge for each and every product. If the data is huge, they charge for the data. At times, we have to use third party services for data cleaning, and they charge for that as well."

"The price is very high and has become a big concern for our customers who require the solution in order for their business to function smoothly."

"Informatica MDM's pricetag should come down. They have to cut some costs."

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) pricing and cost advice

"Depends on situation. We prefer to have data onsite, but some might prefer web access."

"NCOA address verification was a requirement from USPS to send out the mailers. This was the only option that charged per address which was extremely helpful since we are a small non-profit school."

"Trial subscriptions (via cloud) are very cheap and easy to use. It’s a great way to test Listware to see if you want to go deeper with integration."

"We are concerned that our own pricing is going up every year for Melissa Data products, but we highly recommend the services for people who are routinely sending out mailings."

"This vendor has no equal in pricing for equivalent functionality."

"Cloud version is very cheap. On-premise version is expensive."

"The only complaint that I have towards it is they sell licenses based on a range of usage, and I feel those ranges are too large."

"The price for address validation is similar in all software. However, the price for geocoding decides the actual pricing. If you get their most accurate geocoding (called GeoPoints), then it will add about $10k+ per million requests."

More Melissa Data Quality pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Insurance Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	51
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	153

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?

Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...

See all answers

What are the biggest benefits of using Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

When it comes to cloud data integration, this solution can provide you with multiple benefits, including: Overhead reduction by integrating data on any cloud in various ways Effective integration ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 4% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 3% of the time

TIBCO EBX vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

Compared 2% of the time

More Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Competitors

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 21% of the time

Experian Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 16% of the time

Coheris Spad Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 12% of the time

Anchor Software Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 10% of the time

Eprentise Data Quality vs Melissa Data Quality

Compared 8% of the time

More Melissa Data Quality Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)

December 2025

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) report

Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) product report

Buyer's Guide

Melissa Data Quality

December 2025

Download Melissa Data Quality product report

Also Known As

ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Address Verification, Persistent Data Masking

No data available

Overview

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) offers seamless integration of master data management, data quality, and data integration with a cloud-native architecture supporting multiple data management styles, optimizing data governance through metadata management.

IDMC enhances data synchronization and mapping tasks, utilizing a broad range of connectors to interact efficiently with data sources. Its precise address validation via AddressDoctor and intuitive navigation bolster user empowerment, delivering agility, scalability, and security in data governance. Despite its strengths, areas like ease of use, SAP integration, and reporting could benefit from enhancements. Connectivity issues and workflow complexities are noted, needing improvements in performance, support, and licensing cost. Users demand expanded ETL capabilities, real-time processing, and broader data source support to address growing data needs.

What are the key features of IDMC?

Integration Capabilities: Ensures seamless connectivity between on-premise and cloud environments.
Master Data Management: Centralizes and streamlines data processes for enhanced quality.
Data Quality: Employs tools for cleansing and standardizing data accuracy.
Address Validation: Features AddressDoctor for precise address verification.
Real-Time Processing: Supports real-time data handling for critical operations.
Connectivity Options: Offers a wide array of connectors for easy data source interaction.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Scalability: Cloud-native design boosts system agility, adapting to data volume changes.
Security: Enhances data protection with robust encryption and compliance measures.
Efficiency: Automates processes to reduce manual effort and errors.
Flexibility: Supports diverse data management styles, offering adaptability to business changes.
Governance: Empowers effective data governance through comprehensive metadata management.

In industries such as banking, healthcare, and telecom, IDMC is implemented for data integration, cloud migration, and enhancing data quality. Its capabilities are crucial for metadata management, lineage tracking, and real-time processing, ensuring high data quality and streamlined operations.

Informatica

Data Quality Components for SSIS

This suite of data transformations for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) delivers the full spectrum of data quality including data profiling, data verification, data enrichment and data matching. With an intuitive interface and drag/drop capabilities, this powerful toolkit makes it easy to unify data into a single version of the truth for Master Data Management (MDM) success.

Melissa

Sample Customers

The Travel Company, Carbonite

Boeing Co., FedEx, Ford Motor Co, Hewlett Packard, Meade-Johnson, Microsoft, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, SAAB Cars USA, Sony, Walt Disney, Weight Watchers, and Intel.

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

December 2025

Free Report: Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. Melissa Data Quality report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.