Infor M3 vs SYSPRO comparison

Infor and SYSPRO are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while SYSPRO is ranked #31. Infor holds a 2.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to SYSPRO’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution.

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

4,045 Views
3,883 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SYSPRO

Read 1 SYSPRO review

1,130 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Infor M3

SYSPRO

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infor M3 and SYSPRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP.

To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ERP

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,418 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (8th)

SYSPRO

Ranking in ERP

31st

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 2.3%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SYSPRO is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Infor M3	2.3%
SYSPRO	1.1%
Other	96.6%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Umesh D

Vice President, Delivery at Independent Computer Consulting Group, Incorporated

Maximized industry-specific process efficiency with rapid implementation

The best features of Infor M3 are the micro-vertical and industry ready-made solutions rather than generic solutions. They have ready-made solutions ready, so the implementation of the process discovery happens very fast. It won't take more than two months, and if the process is very simple and they adopt the standard, it may happen within five weeks, covering the implementation cycle which will finish within seven to eight months. Most of the time, it helps streamline business processes; maybe some processes such as unique subcontracting vary by continent or job work, which could be different due to legal compliance. Other than that, everything helps because the processes are very much streamlined. Everywhere you have a check and maker concept, there is a workflow, and all those things are there; document management is also very simple. You can drag and drop the reports. The workflow feature is very good and flexible, working with multi-level authorization and all those capabilities. Apart from that, the GUI interface screens are really good. Users can design their own workspace based on the roles, and there are roles-based security options, with many roles available that you need not define—you can just tweak them.

Read full review

reviewer1413297

Managing Director at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A great choice for straight manufacturing, but not suitable for complex manufacturing models

SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface and user experience were good."

"M3 has several useful features for managing supply chains, production, and customer orders. It's an excellent system that helps me meet all my requirements for fixed costs."

"Overall, I rate Infor M3 nine out of ten for a positive experience."

"Infor M3 has tailor-made packages for each and every industry."

"The solution provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it."

"It has improved the way our organization functions by keeping things in order."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Infor GL tool that allows us to do our application support and development."

More Infor M3 pros

"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good; it is quite simple but powerful, and similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."

Cons

"An area for improvement in Infor M3 is training. There should be more training resources available for clients. Clients also find it challenging to get consultants or integrators for Infor M3. The product doesn't have enough resources in the market to help clients."

"From a technology perspective, this is an old solution making it harder to integrate and maintain."

"Improvements could be made in security and scalability."

"The configuration appears to have been designed around theory rather than practice."

"The solution is stable but not agile."

"We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

More Infor M3 cons

"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module."

"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Infor M3?

In Microsoft, it is easier to work due to its .NET technology and hybrid architecture, but Infor M3 is more structured, requiring in-depth knowledge of its rules and table names. I think they shoul...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 17% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 12% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 12% of the time

Infor Distribution SX.e vs Infor M3

Compared 7% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor M3

Compared 6% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs SYSPRO

Compared 24% of the time

SAP ERP vs SYSPRO

Compared 23% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs SYSPRO

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Business One vs SYSPRO

Compared 8% of the time

More SYSPRO Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

July 2026

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

ERP

June 2026

Download SYSPRO product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

No data available

Overview

Infor M3 is a comprehensive ERP solution designed for ease of use and customization, supporting industries like manufacturing, food and beverages, and chemicals with robust functionalities in finance, supply chain, and manufacturing processes.

Infor M3 offers extensive capabilities in managing core business operations for finance, manufacturing, and supply chain management. It features ease of integration with third-party applications, an intuitive interface, and fast implementation using ready-made solutions. Its flexibility makes it suitable for industry-specific requirements, providing detailed insights into manufacturing with reliable data extraction and efficient bug fixes. Used widely in multinational manufacturing setups and distribution sectors across Europe and India, Infor M3 manages processes from invoicing to purchasing, ensuring streamlined business operations.

What are the key features of Infor M3?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with an intuitive design.
High Customization: Adjusts to specific business needs.
Integration: Compatible with third-party applications.
Finance Management: Comprehensive GL tool for accounting.
Supply Chain: Efficiently manages procurement and logistics.
Manufacturing Insights: Provides detailed process analytics.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Infor M3?

Streamlined Implementation: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime.
Improved Business Intelligence: Data-driven decision support.
User-Friendly Design: Enhances operational efficiency.
Industry-Specific Adaptability: Suits diverse sectors.
Reliable Performance: Consistent bug fixes enhance functionality.

Infor M3 is particularly beneficial within manufacturing, food and beverage, and chemical industries for planning, procurement, and warehousing needs. Integrated with third-party tools, it is favored by multinational enterprises for tasks ranging from invoicing to purchasing, across regions such as Europe and India. Users often seek better integration, industry-standard features, and improved procurement and supply chain capabilities, alongside a demand for enhanced security measures and easier online documentation.

Infor

SYSPRO is a comprehensive ERP software designed to streamline manufacturing and distribution processes. It offers industry-specific solutions, focusing on efficient management of resources and optimized operations.

Designed to integrate seamlessly within manufacturing and distribution sectors, SYSPRO provides tailored solutions that enhance operational efficiency. Its capabilities extend to real-time data access, inventory management, and seamless integration with existing systems, ensuring improved productivity and decision-making.

What are SYSPRO's key features?

Inventory Management: Efficient tracking and control of stock levels
Real-Time Data Access: Enables instant insights for informed decision-making
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing business systems
Manufacturing Capabilities: Supports complex production processes
Distribution Optimization: Streamlines logistics and supply chain operations

What benefits should users look for in SYSPRO?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational expenses through optimized processes
Improved Productivity: Enhances employee efficiency and output
Scalability: Grows with business needs without requiring substantial changes
Enhanced Decision-Making: Provides critical insights through data analytics
Increased Flexibility: Adaptable to changing business requirements

SYSPRO implementation is well-suited for industries such as electronics, industrial equipment, and automotive manufacturing. It supports specific operational needs such as regulatory compliance, batch traceability, and lean manufacturing practices, allowing businesses to maintain quality and efficiency in their workflows.

SYSPRO

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

Arctic Manufacturing

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.