Inflectra Rapise vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

The compared Inflectra and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Inflectra is ranked #24 in TAt , and holds a 1.5% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #37 in FT , and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

2,984 Views
1,223 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

1,154 Views
992 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

OpenText Business Processin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (38th), Test Automation Tools (24th), AI Quality Assurance (8th)

OpenText Business Processin...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (37th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Inflectra Rapise is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 1.5%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
OpenText Business Processing Testing, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Inflectra Rapise	1.5%
Tricentis Tosca	10.7%
OpenText Functional Testing	7.6%
Other	80.2%

Test Automation Tools

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.9%
Tricentis Tosca	9.7%
OpenText Functional Testing	7.8%
Other	81.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward; it wasn't complex at all, and we found it nice and easy."

"Rapise is a good automation tool that's easy to use and learn, and you can share scripts as a team, which is very helpful."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The scripting of this tool is easy and user friendly."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"We saved thousands of dollars because the Rapise implementation gave us 30 or more executions for every release compared to three or four, so huge savings on manual testing effort plus easy detection of defects is very cost effective."

"It's incredible but the support and maintenance of Inflectra Rapise's scripts is less than 30% of the effort that was involved in maintaining Selenium, it is very easy and this is the reason that we are switching everything that needs handling from Selenium to Inflectra Rapise, as it is easy to maintain and provides a benefit in cost and efforts with a 90% reduction factor in the maintenance of the scripts."

More Inflectra Rapise pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

Cons

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"When there are failures in a nightly run of batches of scripts, it can create a blocking situation where all the following scripts will fail due to unexpected results."

"I faced one problem where it can't validate the colour of images and text. Also, it could not automate the mobile app, and this needs to be included."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"The maintenance is very difficult."

"What I have noticed about Rapise is that sometimes when you keep on using the same script, it fails many times."

"It has some stability issues where the tool crashes sometimes on Windows 10."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

17%

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Construction Company

18%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 4% of the time

Hyland RPA vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 3% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 17% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Testim vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

August 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Also Known As

Rapise

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Migros Bank AG

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2026

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing report.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.