I would like to see incident.io improved in terms of maturity, as it is not a complete solution at the moment. It narrowly focuses solely on incident management and lacks the breadth of a platform such as PagerDuty, which has a high service catalog encompassing everything from asset management to change management. incident.io is not there yet. It's not so much of a feature request; it's about the niche they're working on. For it to develop further for enterprise-level customers, it needs to transition into more of a platform than just a solution. When it comes to pricing, I have seen a great ROI with incident.io after switching from PagerDuty. However, I must clarify that those ROIs were also met with PagerDuty, meaning it isn't extensive that we are observing. The MTTR trends are something that is sadly missing in incident.io, which we had with PagerDuty. Cost estimations are also lacking. If an incident occurs, for example, seeing high cardinality metrics in production leading to a jump in billing, those estimations can't be done in incident.io while they could be done in PagerDuty. Thus, it feels more of a downgrade for us, but again, every choice has its pros and cons. incident.io is cheaper, and we needed a more economical solution, as simple as that.
