Imprivata OneSign vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Imprivata Logo
1,066 views|637 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
1,390 views|1,008 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Imprivata OneSign and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Imprivata OneSign vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack.""It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

More Imprivata OneSign Pros →

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices.""It is very easy to scale and use as you want.""The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.""Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well.""Good support for single sign-on protocols."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Pros →

Cons
"They should have a landing page.""I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

More Imprivata OneSign Cons →

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords.""Security could be improved.""The product’s technical support services could be better.""Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."
  • "At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."
  • More Imprivata OneSign Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."
  • "If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."
  • "The license is around $8000 USD."
  • "Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."
  • More Red Hat Single Sign On Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution.
    Top Answer:They provide a license key. I am not able to disclose the pricing information. At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable.
    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.
    Top Answer:Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive. There are similar local solutions available at low-cost.
    Top Answer:The product’s technical support services could be better. Additionally, they should add complimentary software security versions.
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    1,066
    Comparisons
    637
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    10.0
    11th
    Views
    1,390
    Comparisons
    1,008
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    227
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management
    Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO
    Learn More
    Overview

    Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

    Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

    Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

    Sample Customers
    AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Healthcare Company20%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Imprivata OneSign vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Imprivata OneSign vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Keeper, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, AWS IAM Identity Center and PingFederate. See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.