We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and Symantec Identity Governance and Administration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"I've used it to manage users, create and update, delete users, change passwords, and assign and change rules."
"It offers a nice price. It's mid-range."
"The product is relatively easier to use than other identity management products."
"The scalability potential is there if a company needs to expand."
"It has good endpoint support and endpoint connectivity to different versioning endpoints."
"Connector Xpress and Policy Xpress and the new interface."
"I like that it is easy to diagnose. It has a version of a virtual appliance so we can download it, run it, configure it, and it would take about 10 to 15 minutes to configure the cluster or so."
"Provisioning engine (on the back-end, separate from front-end components, that's part of layered architecture)."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"A better information display for the approvals within the workflow would give them more information and the ability to comment back on a request as to why they're rejecting it. We've been telling them we'd like this improvement, and we hope to see it."
"Identity Manager has a lack of entitlement support, unlike other products that I have worked with."
"Provisioning has a dependency on Windows."
"The product works slowly while accessing cloud-native solutions."
"The reporting functions."
"I find the API boring. I also faced issues while integrating with CA SSO."
"In the next release, there should be provisioning of your certifications."
"The support from Symantec Identity Governance and Administration could improve."
More Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews while Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is ranked 9th in User Provisioning Software with 65 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Identity Governance and Administration writes "Works well on-premises and has partial capabilities but lacks many feaures". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor, ManageEngine ADManager Plus and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, AlertEnterprise Enterprise Guardian, SAP Identity Management, Microsoft Identity Manager and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management. See our Imanami GroupID vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.