Idira Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while ManageEngine is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 9.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

22,329 Views
9,378 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ManageEngine PAM360

Read 6 ManageEngine PAM360 reviews

2,046 Views
2,005 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

ManageEngine PAM360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and ManageEngine PAM360 compete in privileged access management. With a comprehensive feature set, ManageEngine PAM360 holds an edge, but Idira's competitive pricing and support are noteworthy for budget-conscious organizations.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager includes automated threat detection, centralized policy management, and straightforward monitoring tools. ManageEngine PAM360 offers advanced audit capabilities, session monitoring, and extensive third-party integrations, suitable for complex operational environments.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its integration capabilities and audit features to compete more effectively with advanced competitors. Additionally, expanding user flexibility and customization options would benefit users. ManageEngine PAM360 could streamline its deployment process, improve user interface design for better usability, and offer more competitive price structures for broader appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Idira Privileged Access Manager is praised for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer service, appealing to those seeking a streamlined experience. ManageEngine PAM360 offers a more involved setup but benefits from comprehensive resources and responsive support, beneficial for long-term usability.

Pricing and ROI: Idira Privileged Access Manager is recognized for competitive initial costs and quick ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. ManageEngine PAM360, while potentially costlier, justifies expenses with extensive capabilities, suggesting a better ROI for environments demanding comprehensive security management.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,836 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

230

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (2nd), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)

ManageEngine PAM360

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Idira Privileged Access Manager is 9.9%, down from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine PAM360 is 2.3%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Idira Privileged Access Manager	9.9%
ManageEngine PAM360	2.3%
Other	87.8%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Atul-Gujar

CyberArk manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Secures critical infrastructures with essential user session audit records

A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk. For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Remote session recording enhances server access tracking while dashboard needs improvement

PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes. The automation system is very smart, although its interface is not as sophisticated as those of Dynatrace or FortiFEM. A critical advantage is its flexibility and security, providing stability across our client interactions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I appreciate about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is that it is not only for password security; we can also manage their applications and platforms, and whenever a user logs in, end-to-end protection is handled, including monitoring user activity through PSM servers and reacting to threats with Privileged Threat Analysis."

"Its features like detailed audit and reporting, automated workflows, granulated privileged access controls, automated password rotation, and centralized and secure storage have helped us in developing a secure environment for customers, along with audit and compliance coverage."

"The technical support for this solution is very good. If I was to rate it on a scale of one to five, I would give it a five."

"What I found most valuable in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the Session Manager as it allows you to split the connection between the administrator site and the target site. I also found the Password Manager valuable as it lets you rotate the passwords of privileged users."

"It's user-friendly and very configurable. We can do many things with it, especially with password management."

"Central Password Manager is useful for agentless automated password management through AD integration as well as endpoints for different devices."

"The most valuable feature is privileged session management."

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager indeed helps meet compliance and regulatory requirements for customers, especially in the financial sector, by aligning with PCI DSS standards."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

"Our clients use this solution for the rotation of keys and passwords. It is a part of logs."

"We can use it remotely as well."

"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."

"ManageEngine PAM360 is an easy-to-use solution with competitive pricing compared to brands like Delinea and CyberArk."

"PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes."

"My advice would be, if you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."

Cons

"The tool's UI has bugs and lags. It needs to be improved. The deployment process can be complex due to multiple components for various functionalities, each requiring separate infrastructure management. To simplify this process, consolidating all these components into a single platform could be beneficial. The product's pricing could be cheaper."

"it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs."

"Many of the infrastructure folks who use the product dislike it because it complicates their workflow."

"The initial setup was somewhat complex, but we received help from the product support team with the installation."

"One of our current issues is a publishing issue. If we whitelist Google Chrome, all the events of Google Chrome should be gone. It is not happening."

"It is web-based, but other competitors have apps. We need to get there. It is just smoother to have an app. You don't have all the bugs from having a browser, and people like them better, since you can get to them via mobile."

"If you are an administrator or architect, then the solution is kind of complicated, as it is mostly focused on the end user. So, they need to also focus on the people who are implementing it."

"It should be easy to use for non-technical people. Its interface can be a bit difficult. Some parts of its interface are not very intuitive. Some of the controls are hidden, and instead of having a screen with all the controls for that account on it, you have to use menus and other similar things."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."

"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."

"PAM360's dashboard needs improvement for clearer presentations, similar to ManageEngine products like AD audit plus and Password Manager Plus, which offer a clearer picture."

"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."

"ManageEngine PAM360 could benefit from more automation activities and a user interface change."

"It should have better documentation about how to install, work and configure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional features added to our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager license. For example, features that allow us to integrate into various kinds of platforms."

"The SaaS version of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is very expensive, but the on-premises version is relative, e.g. depending on the size of the environment, it can be a bit pricey, but it's relatively okay compared to the others."

"Before we bought it, they were licensing each function individually, which got complicated and very expensive. When we decided to buy it, it was much more straightforward and still quite expensive, but it brings a lot of value and risk reduction to the organization."

"Since CyberArk is at the top of the Gartner list, the cost is indeed on the higher side, but customers must discern which entities are essential to purchase. They should weigh the cost against the quality received."

"The price of this solution is expensive."

"My company always complains about the cost of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager because it's too high."

"No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

"The product is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"Though I don't have the exact numbers related to the cost of the solution, I can say that it costs somewhere around INR 7,00,000 for ten licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	175

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine PAM360?

ManageEngine PAM360 could benefit from more automation activities and a user interface change. Although the support is really good, there's still room for improvement in automation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360?

Our primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360 ( /products/manageengine-pam360-reviews ) involved securing our organization’s devices, implementing access policies, and managing privileged access eff...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine PAM360?

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ManageEngine PAM360 as nine. It's a really good tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

One Identity Safeguard vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 10% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 7% of the time

ProofID Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 6% of the time

Veza vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 6% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine PAM360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

July 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2026

Download ManageEngine PAM360 product report

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

PAM360

Overview

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

ManageEngine PAM360 offers advanced password management with access control and session recording, ensuring secure, efficient operations. It provides a user-friendly interface and effective deployment, making it a reliable option for managing access policies and privileged identities.

Designed for organizations requiring robust access control, ManageEngine PAM360 delivers a comprehensive suite of features including password vaulting, playback, and session recording. The interface, though user-friendly, could benefit from enhancements like multi-factor authentication and better integration with Linux. The tool's strength lies in its flexible, secure, and stable client interactions, automation capabilities, and notable key management functions. However, improvements in dashboard intuitiveness and resolving latency issues are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of PAM360?

Password Vault: Safely stores and manages passwords to prevent unauthorized access.
Session Recording: Monitors sessions to track user activity and maintain security.
Remote Access Management: Facilitates secure remote access while managing privileged identities.
Key Management: Enables efficient key rotation to enhance security.
Playback Feature: Replays recorded sessions for detailed reviews and audits.

What benefits can users expect from PAM360?

Improved Security: Tracks access effectively to prevent unauthorized activities.
Efficient Deployment: Offers straightforward implementation with a user-friendly design.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides competitive pricing and value for investment.
Increased Operational Efficiency: Automates key tasks to streamline management processes.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, ManageEngine PAM360 is widely utilized for monitoring and controlling user access, securing sensitive information, and managing privileged identities. By recording sessions, it helps these sectors limit unauthorized access and ensure compliance with industry regulations.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

June 2026

Free Report: Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.