


IBM Workload Automation and UiPath Orchestrator compete in the automation and workload management category. UiPath Orchestrator seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and centralized data management features.
Features: IBM Workload Automation offers comprehensive scheduling options, support for SAP and Oracle integrations, and real-time database updating. It also enables complex event rules and multiplatform integration. UiPath Orchestrator stands out with precise scheduling, centralized data management, and robust reporting features. Its asset management utilities further enhance its value to users.
Room for Improvement: IBM Workload Automation could improve its SLA monitoring, GUI intuitiveness, and built-in SFTP/FTP functionalities. Enhancing cloud system integration and reducing manual processes would be beneficial. UiPath Orchestrator could improve UI flexibility, queue management, and exception handling. Enhanced AI integration and a more intuitive UI could also elevate its usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Workload Automation supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, requiring significant expertise. While its technical support is knowledge-rich, some users note variability in support quality. UiPath Orchestrator offers easier setup with cloud and on-premises deployments. Its responsive technical support is rated higher by users, despite pricing and licensing complexities.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Workload Automation’s pricing is high due to its PVU licensing model, though its reliability and capabilities offer noticeable ROI. UiPath Orchestrator also has high licensing costs based on elements used. However, its cloud-based offerings provide flexibility, and many users find its functionality justifies the cost, despite potential for cost reductions to improve market penetration.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
The impact of UiPath Orchestrator's analytics on the decision-making process is important because it shortens the decision-making time, which helps customers.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
I would rate their support between eight and nine out of ten.
Their support teams are not sufficiently qualified to support us in our needs.
It's on the better side, but still has room for improvement in the speed of response.
I can give customer service an eight out of ten, though sometimes I find difficulties and have trouble finding support.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
The solution's flexibility in integration and scheduling across different environments suggests good scalability.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
The solution is stable and integrated well with other systems.
We usually install UiPath on-premises, and then we proceed with web application automations, which has been easy.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
The maintenance charges have increased significantly, and a lower cost would be beneficial.
I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.
UiPath Orchestrator setup is easy, but the settings could be made easier for other people to understand.
I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high.
Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain customers because of this.
It would be beneficial for UiPath to further refine pricing, setup costs, and licensing by making their tool more intuitive and simplifying complex functionalities.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
One valuable feature of IBM Workload Automation is the ability to combine different applications and platforms to organize jobs together, creating dependencies.
The centralized nature of UiPath Orchestrator provides a seamless experience for managing automation processes.
Compared to UiPath, there are many packages available to make automation easier, which is why I find UiPath to be the best.
We use UiPath Orchestrator to connect with different applications, extract and analyze data by specific criteria, and send emails.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.6% |
| UiPath Orchestrator | 1.1% |
| IBM Workload Automation | 4.9% |
| Other | 91.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
IBM Workload Automation streamlines scheduling with automation and dynamic workload balancing. It integrates multiple platforms, offering efficient management across diverse systems, enhancing operational productivity.
IBM Workload Automation provides end-to-end control in managing tasks across varied platforms, supporting event-based scheduling and real-time updates. Its intuitive GUI allows seamless scripting and monitoring, facilitating integration with applications like SAP and Oracle. The inclusion of FTA agents ensures efficient local dependency management, while offering versatile scheduling options. Its capability to provide a comprehensive view, manage CPU usage, and meet service level agreements positions it as a valuable tool for large-scale operations.
What are the most important features?Industries such as government, banking, and large enterprises implement IBM Workload Automation for automated scheduling, workload balancing, and batch processing. It assists in migrating from legacy systems to web-based services, integrating with numerous applications, and managing extensive daily job lists. Key functions include offshore management and backend data collection, crucial for effective resource tracking. This adaptability enables organizations to efficiently support operations while scaling workloads as needed.
UiPath Orchestrator offers a centralized platform for managing robotic process automation tasks, featuring advanced scheduling, integration capabilities, and robust monitoring to enhance workflow efficiency across environments.
UiPath Orchestrator provides a comprehensive suite of tools for automating workflows, centralizing data management, and ensuring security compliance. Known for its ease of use, it helps businesses schedule robots, handle reports, and monitor logs centrally. It facilitates task deployment across diverse environments, simplifies document understanding, process automation, and provides insights into bot activities. While installation and complexity are areas for improvement, Orchestrator remains integral in sectors like finance, telecom, and healthcare.
What features does UiPath Orchestrator provide?Organizations leverage UiPath Orchestrator for automating workflows such as website processes and supply chain management. In industries like finance and healthcare, it is used for provisioning and data entry. It provides a framework to configure machines, create templates, and manage resources, driving efficiency and innovation.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.