IBM Workload Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

IBM and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8, while UiPath is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. IBM holds a 6.9% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

IBM Workload Automation

Read 32 IBM Workload Automation reviews

3,686 Views
2,420 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 33 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

307 Views
176 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Workload Automation

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

IBM Workload Automation and UiPath Orchestrator compete in automation, with IBM favored for scheduling and workload management and UiPath preferred for RPA with flexibility and ease of use. UiPath Orchestrator is often seen as offering more value for the cost with its advanced automation capabilities, despite IBM's advantage in pricing and support.

Features: IBM Workload Automation excels in workload scheduling, job execution consistency, and comprehensive reporting, managing complex workflows effectively. UiPath Orchestrator provides robust RPA solutions, seamless integration capabilities, and efficient digital workforce management. IBM focuses on workload balancing, while UiPath emphasizes process automation optimization.

Room for Improvement: IBM Workload Automation could enhance its deployment and integration flexibility, improve user interface navigation, and simplify configuration processes. UiPath Orchestrator might benefit from enhanced scalability options, better customization features, and improved AI-driven analytics for more intuitive decision making.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath Orchestrator is known for its quick and easy cloud-based deployment, backed by extensive documentation and responsive support. IBM Workload Automation requires more technical expertise due to its detailed configurations but offers robust tools for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Workload Automation involves a higher initial setup cost aimed at large enterprises needing detailed customization. UiPath Orchestrator presents a more scalable and potentially less expensive upfront cost model, delivering rapid ROI through task automation efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of IBM Workload Automation is 6.9%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Ilhami Arikan

Cloud Services Automation Technologies Manager at Garanti Teknoloji

With an easy setup phase in place, agent-based installation can be done in minutes

Sometimes we have issues with the solution's stability. So, stability can be improved. Reporting and visibility of the solution need improvement. These days, we need more visibility. We need to access the logs and databases easily. You need to keep track of the running number of logs, like which ones are executed, completed, etc. So if there would be a good reporting dashboard, then it would be good. There's room for improvement in the solution since it is a challenging thing when we want to use the solution's technology with our new technologies. For example, if we need to use TWS on our OpenShift platform, the solution's API is not capable enough. So the product itself needs to be aligned with new technologies.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Workload Automation provides good performance and monitoring."

"The DWC, when configured correctly, is a great GUI tool to provide Self-Service Scheduling capabilities to the user community."

"It offers features like MDM and a Windows workstation, although there are some technical dependencies. It is more user-friendly and also includes failover and failback capabilities. While both systems offer high availability, Control-M's high availability is superior to AWS's."

"The technical support is great, the product is easy-to-use, and it is stable."

"The solution helps automate processes so that the workload can be handled on a daily basis."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Workload Automation is its holistic view, which helps me find technical solutions quickly. For instance, if a customer has an issue completing their workload within a specific time frame, the tool provides enough information to identify and resolve the issue. One of the main challenges is dealing with data infrastructure problems and pending updates. Workload Automation helps me leverage current AI capabilities to recommend architectural updates to avoid these issues. It also allows me to balance CPU usage effectively, ensuring service level agreements are met. The interface is user-friendly and facilitates this process smoothly."

"The most important feature is the creation of folders. It's a really great feature because you can organize the process with naming conventions."

"The support from Cisco is very good. I was with them as a company for 40 years"

More IBM Workload Automation pros

"The logs are the best feature of the solution."

"I also create user and machine templates and do other work in Orchestrator."

"UiPath Orchestrator has helped us by replacing manual processes with automation."

"Orchestrator's most valuable features include schedulers, queues, and integration with Splunk."

"The most beneficial feature is the queue system, which allows robots to process a large volume of data simultaneously."

"It was very simple to use and allowed us to easily record and manage activities."

"UiPath Orchestrator has eliminated the need for human operation, enhancing our automation process."

"I like UiPath Orchestrator's screen capture feature."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"The schedule refreshes daily and that's a challenge for us."

"The solution should offer more free technical sessions to customers so that they can gain more experience or learn more about how to use it."

"IBM needs to move away from its native terminology and adopt a more cloud-centric approach."

"It should support other schedulers that aren't IBM products."

"The solution's installation could be improved because the customers have to do it all the time."

"Slow down on the releases a bit. I fully understand that IWA functionality is increasing at an amazing rate, but trying to keep up with the upgrades is rough."

"Scalability-wise, it can be a little bit challenging."

"The configuration of IBM Workload Automation has some challenges. We have a difficult time customizing it, but it is similar to other solutions."

More IBM Workload Automation cons

"We encounter errors while configuring and integrating the product with other vendors."

"The licensing cost associated with the tool is too high. If the tool can reduce the license cost, most of the organizations will opt for it."

"UiPath Orchestrator is sometimes a bit clunky, and a few things don't work in the tool as they should."

"The solution's pricing can be more competitive. Apache is one of the most expensive alternatives in the market. The integration with reporting tools and classic solutions is essential. Having BI integration, Salesforce integration, and robust monitoring and reporting capabilities would enhance the product."

"The solution’s licensing cost is high and could be improved."

"The solution's deployment and architecture aspects could be improved."

"One area for improvement in UiPath Orchestrator is enhancing automation for exceptional cases."

"The vision libraries that the tool provides, along with the visualization part, are areas with shortcomings in the solution where improvements are required."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We transitioned from a server license to per job license, and that saved us a lot money."

"The solution's pricing is affordable."

"Pricing depends on the number of agents that you install."

"The solution is a little bit expensive."

"To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA."

"The contract is with the customer with whom we are working, so IBM is not directly involved in this."

"It is about one-third of the cost of a controller."

"UiPath Orchestrator's price is reasonable. We pay around 40k USD. Its licensing costs are yearly."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is expensive, and the associated licenses add to the expenses, initially making deploying new processes costly."

"The products are available for free on the cloud, and even it is the same to a certain extent for the on-premises version. The pricing is included as a part of the license of the robot from UiPath."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"The tool's licensing cost is high. I rate the tool an eight or nine on a scale from one to ten, where ten means expensive."

"The pricing is quite reasonable, particularly with the cloud version where Orchestrator is included in all other licenses at no additional cost."

"The product is expensive."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Workload Automation?

The initial setup is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Workload Automation?

IBM needs to move away from its native terminology and adopt a more cloud-centric approach. For example, IBM still refers to machines as 'workstations,' whereas other systems, like Control-M, use m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Workload Automation?

We use the solution for network automation.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high. However, we can compete with that, though if they decrease the prices, it would lead to better market penetration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

I would like to see high availability over two sites, with a main site and a disaster recovery working as an active-active solution, which is not currently supported.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 29% of the time

HCL Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 19% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 15% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Stonebranch vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Workload Automation Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 49% of the time

Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 32% of the time

JAMS vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 19% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation

April 2025

Download IBM Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS

No data available

Overview

IBM Workload Automation helps companies manage operations, portfolio management, resource collection, and dependency scheduling. It facilitates transitions from legacy apps to web services, executing batch processing for tens of thousands of jobs daily with hundreds of users.

Teams rely on IBM Workload Automation to optimize backend workloads, maintain service levels, and offer support in remote environments. Its interface and job scheduler are appreciated for their value and effectiveness. Users benefit from batch automation, multiple node job triggering, stability, and batch app tracking. It provides a holistic view to resolve technical issues and leverage AI for updates. Its user-friendly interface simplifies workload management. Performance, monitoring, request features for adding functionalities, and workload management are key advantages.

What are the most important features?

Interface and Job Scheduler: Highly valued for managing processes efficiently.
Batch Automation: Facilitates the automation of batch processing tasks.
Multiple Node Job Triggering: Enables triggering jobs across multiple nodes.
Stability: Ensures a reliable and consistent performance.
Batch App Tracking: Allows tracking and monitoring of batch applications.
Holistic View: Helps in resolving technical issues and leveraging AI.

What are the benefits or ROI items to look for in reviews?

Performance: Enhanced system performance and monitoring capabilities.
Workload Management: Effective management of various workload types.
Request Feature: Ability to add new functionalities as needed.

IBM Workload Automation is implemented across several industries for diverse tasks. Companies executing high-volume batch processing, managing complex job dependencies, and transitioning from legacy systems find it valuable. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing utilize it to maintain operational efficiency, enhance system performance, and automate critical processes.

IBM

UiPath Orchestrator automates website processes, manages supply chains, handles log-ins, and processes invoices efficiently. It's a comprehensive tool for generating reports, managing RPA workflows, scheduling robots, and ensuring task accuracy, making it indispensable for organizations aiming to optimize automation.

UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its user-friendly interface, centralized data collection, and robust security measures. Its intuitive design, combined with a comprehensive view of bot activity, makes it highly appreciated among users. With asset encryption, AI-integrated functionalities, and role-based access control, organizations find it reduces the need for extensive technical knowledge, thereby enhancing automation efficiency. It also excels in asset and queue management, logging capabilities, and scheduling functions, contributing significantly to streamlined operational processes.

What are the most important features of UiPath Orchestrator?

Centralized data collection: Provides a unified view of all automation activities
Robust security measures: Includes asset encryption and role-based access control
Scheduling functions: Allows efficient planning and execution of automated tasks
Asset and queue management: Enhances organization in handling automation assets
Logging capabilities: Tracks activities for better oversight and troubleshooting
AI-integrated functionalities: Improves accuracy and efficiency in automation

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating UiPath Orchestrator?

Market visibility: Increased exposure and promotional activities
Code management: Improved management capabilities for Studio
Support response: Faster and more efficient support services
Credential vault: Enhanced flexibility in handling transactional items
AI capabilities: Advanced features at competitive pricing
Documentation: Clearer guidelines for transitioning setups
Integration: Better integration with reporting tools and comprehensive dashboards
Licensing: Streamlined processes for managing licenses
Monitoring: Centralized triggers for better process monitoring

UiPath Orchestrator sees wide application across industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. In manufacturing, it streamlines supply chain processes and automates inventory management. Finance companies use it for processing invoices and managing compliance, while the healthcare sector benefits from automating patient data handling and optimizing appointment scheduling. Each industry leverages the platform\'s extensive capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and accuracy.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Workload Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.