IBM Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs comparison

IBM and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Redwood Software is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.4. IBM holds a 6.9% mindshare in WA, compared to Redwood Software’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

IBM Workload Automation

Read 33 IBM Workload Automation reviews

3,669 Views
1,560 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Redwood RunMyJobs

Read 30 Redwood RunMyJobs reviews

2,657 Views
697 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Workload Automation

Redwood RunMyJobs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

We performed a comparison between IBM Workload Automation and Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: IBM Workload Automation provides client-driven feature development, multi-node job triggering, and easy batch application tracking. Redwood Software stands out with its powerful job definition capabilities, simplified job management, error-handling, and integration with multiple systems.

The review highlights areas where IBM Workload Automation can improve, such as performance, navigation, job dependencies, daily schedule refreshes, stability, reporting visibility, and integration with new technologies. Redwood can enhance its reporting features, fix minor issues, improve monitoring and alert service, add role-based access, enhance metrics explorer, incorporate machine learning and AI capabilities, and provide more robust reporting and analytics capabilities.

Service and Support: Customers have praised IBM Workload Automation's technical support, particularly their lab advocacy program for code support. However, some challenges exist in pinpointing the origin of specific issues. Redwood has generally received positive feedback regarding their support, although there is room for improvement.

Ease of Deployment: IBM Workload Automation's initial setup can be difficult for those who are not familiar with IBM tools or application development. However, with help from an IBM engineer or vendor, the process becomes relatively easy. The initial setup for Redwood Software is considered complex and time-consuming due to the large number of jobs and the complexity of the existing system.

Pricing: IBM Workload Automation's setup cost is determined by the customer's contract and can differ based on the number of agents installed. Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition has a pricing model that is based on the number of job executions. Users appreciate Redwood's pricing as it is cost-effective and beneficial for trying out new platforms. Furthermore, Redwood's setup cost and pricing are notably lower compared to competitors such as Control-M and UC4.

ROI: It is difficult to assess the ROI of IBM Workload Automation. However, Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition has demonstrated positive outcomes with a 10% return on investment.

Comparison Results: IBM Workload Automation is the preferred product compared to Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition. Users appreciate IBM's ability to incorporate requested features based on client voting, as well as its capability to trigger jobs in multiple nodes and pre-schedule them.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Workload Automation

Ranking in Workload Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redwood RunMyJobs

Ranking in Workload Automation

3rd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of IBM Workload Automation is 6.9%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redwood RunMyJobs is 7.9%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Alberto-Ezquerra

Information Technology Solution Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

An intuitive dashboard with user-friendly interface and a holistic view that automatically schedules the production workload

The most valuable feature of IBM Workload Automation is its holistic view, which helps me find technical solutions quickly. For instance, if a customer has an issue completing their workload within a specific time frame, the tool provides enough information to identify and resolve the issue. One of the main challenges is dealing with data infrastructure problems and pending updates. Workload Automation helps me leverage current AI capabilities to recommend architectural updates to avoid these issues. It also allows me to balance CPU usage effectively, ensuring service level agreements are met. The interface is user-friendly and facilitates this process smoothly.

Read full review

MaheshKumar6

Senior Analyst at Electronics For Imaging, Inc

Future-proof and powerful with great support

Improvements include: 1) Cost of the Software. Redwood is more expensive than most of the other Automation Software available today; they could make it budget-friendly. 2) It has limited reporting features. Some basic reporting features are missing. 3) There is no option to extract data in Excel. This feature could help in finding errors in the data. 4) Integration with ServiceNow is not supported. 5) The cloud platform compatibility is not up to the mark. 6) Security standards need to be improved. 7) Handling failure is not great; the workflow stops when a job fails and human intervention is required. 8) Configuration and set-up are difficult for someone with less coding knowledge. 9) They need to provide more documentation to assist new users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Workload Automation provides good performance and monitoring."

"Jobs can be triggered in multiple nodes."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Workload Automation is its holistic view, which helps me find technical solutions quickly. For instance, if a customer has an issue completing their workload within a specific time frame, the tool provides enough information to identify and resolve the issue. One of the main challenges is dealing with data infrastructure problems and pending updates. Workload Automation helps me leverage current AI capabilities to recommend architectural updates to avoid these issues. It also allows me to balance CPU usage effectively, ensuring service level agreements are met. The interface is user-friendly and facilitates this process smoothly."

"I recommend IBM Workload Automation as it's a well-established and stable product."

"The solution helps automate processes so that the workload can be handled on a daily basis."

"Provides a robust, full spectrum enterprise-wide WLA platform."

"The DWC, when configured correctly, is a great GUI tool to provide Self-Service Scheduling capabilities to the user community."

"The whole product is valuable because it is a tool for batch automation."

More IBM Workload Automation pros

"This program works with every browser."

"One of Redwood Software's features that I liked was its event-driven automation, which allows IT teams to respond to real-time events, alerts, and notifications from numerous systems."

"Redwood is more flexible and we can schedule the tasks based on different time zones."

"We can achieve anything that anything that we would like to do. In SAP, it's not generally possible with just with SAP. So we have solution manager as an option, but run by job."

"The automated alert response is very useful for long-running and failed jobs during off-business hours."

"There are various ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your business needs and requirements."

"It's a very powerful tool. It has a lot of flexibility for how you can define jobs and build them. There are different ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your specific needs and requirements."

"Installing and configuring Redwood agents are easy, and scheduling jobs on Redwood helps in triggering the batches as per business requirements."

More Redwood RunMyJobs pros

Cons

"It would be helpful to have a mobile app that could be used to follow the job schedule."

"The solution should offer more free technical sessions to customers so that they can gain more experience or learn more about how to use it."

"The schedule refreshes daily and that's a challenge for us."

"IBM needs to move away from its native terminology and adopt a more cloud-centric approach."

"This solution does have bugs and could be improved in this regard. However, these bugs are resolved relatively quickly."

"It should support other schedulers that aren't IBM products."

"To improve IBM Workload Automation, I suggest enhancing automation features further, as more automation would be beneficial. The product is good enough for my current customers, but improving technical support and pricing would be welcome. We often need quicker responses and better solutions than we can manage manually. These improvements would make the product even better."

"There should be more custom documentation, specifically around Java APIs. There should also be more training. In terms of features, we are currently using only 50% of its features. We don't use all features that are available, but there is always room for improvement in all of the tools."

More IBM Workload Automation cons

"Adding machine learning and AI capabilities would enable Redwood to automate more complex business processes and tasks."

"The solution should have more focus on security standards."

"Redwood Software has a high price tag, especially for small and medium-sized businesses that might not have the funds to engage in a complete automation system."

"The dashboard provided can be made more visually appealing and could include more critical data that would help associates in one glance get the required information."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing to new users with limited technical knowledge."

"Customer support should be enhanced so that we can automatically raise tickets and incidents in customer service."

"Redwood automation software could be made more user-friendly and intuitive, making chores and automation processes easier for users to complete."

"The user interface of Redwood can be improved a bit to make it more user-friendly and interesting."

More Redwood RunMyJobs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We transitioned from a server license to per job license, and that saved us a lot money."

"To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA."

"The solution is a little bit expensive."

"Pricing depends on the number of agents that you install."

"It is about one-third of the cost of a controller."

"The contract is with the customer with whom we are working, so IBM is not directly involved in this."

"The solution's pricing is affordable."

"It initially surprised me because we went from an application that was priced by connection to agents/the number of agents to an application that was priced based on the number of job executions. At that time, many of the products we looked at were also priced on job execution. That seems to be more common in the business or in the vendors that provide solutions out there, but that was probably our biggest difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Workload Automation?

The initial setup is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Workload Automation?

IBM Workload Automation could be improved by reducing its cost. The maintenance charges have increased significantly, and a lower cost would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Workload Automation?

We use IBM Workload Automation ( /products/ibm-workload-automation-reviews ) as a scheduler. We install agents on the application servers and use scheduling to trigger jobs on other servers. Our us...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

Even though it is highly-priced, it is a go to SAP product. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What are cloned processes and how do they hinder workload automation?

Dealing with cloned processes can be a real headache for all involved. By using Redwood Software's RunMyJobs, users are able to eliminate the need for cloned job definitions altogether. The platfo...

See all answers

Do you think that a SaaS WLA solution like Redwood can modernize our cloud environment?

From a cost perspective, a modern SaaS like Redwood is advantageous. Unlike some other WLA platforms, this solution offers flexible pricing models and eliminates infrastructure costs. This can sign...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 27% of the time

HCL Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 20% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

OpCon vs IBM Workload Automation

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Workload Automation Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 44% of the time

Control-M vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 22% of the time

Automic Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 8% of the time

Stonebranch vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 8% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 2% of the time

More Redwood RunMyJobs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation

June 2025

Download IBM Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Redwood RunMyJobs

May 2025

Download Redwood RunMyJobs product report

Also Known As

IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS

Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition, Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition, RunMyJobs, Redwood RunMyJobs

Overview

IBM Workload Automation helps companies manage operations, portfolio management, resource collection, and dependency scheduling. It facilitates transitions from legacy apps to web services, executing batch processing for tens of thousands of jobs daily with hundreds of users.

Teams rely on IBM Workload Automation to optimize backend workloads, maintain service levels, and offer support in remote environments. Its interface and job scheduler are appreciated for their value and effectiveness. Users benefit from batch automation, multiple node job triggering, stability, and batch app tracking. It provides a holistic view to resolve technical issues and leverage AI for updates. Its user-friendly interface simplifies workload management. Performance, monitoring, request features for adding functionalities, and workload management are key advantages.

What are the most important features?

Interface and Job Scheduler: Highly valued for managing processes efficiently.
Batch Automation: Facilitates the automation of batch processing tasks.
Multiple Node Job Triggering: Enables triggering jobs across multiple nodes.
Stability: Ensures a reliable and consistent performance.
Batch App Tracking: Allows tracking and monitoring of batch applications.
Holistic View: Helps in resolving technical issues and leveraging AI.

What are the benefits or ROI items to look for in reviews?

Performance: Enhanced system performance and monitoring capabilities.
Workload Management: Effective management of various workload types.
Request Feature: Ability to add new functionalities as needed.

IBM Workload Automation is implemented across several industries for diverse tasks. Companies executing high-volume batch processing, managing complex job dependencies, and transitioning from legacy systems find it valuable. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing utilize it to maintain operational efficiency, enhance system performance, and automate critical processes.

IBM

Redwood Software is a prominent player in the enterprise automation space, known for its robust and scalable solutions. It caters to a wide range of industries, offering tools for IT and business process automation. Redwood Software users on PeerSpot often highlights the flexibility and robustness of the solutions. Many users commend the platform for its ability to automate complex and time-consuming processes, which has led to significant time and cost savings. Additionally, the strong customer support and continuous updates are frequently mentioned, indicating a commitment to evolving with customer needs and technological advancements.

Redwood Software offers a holistic suite of automation tools, covering areas such as finance automation, IT process automation, and robotic process automation (RPA). This comprehensive approach ensures that various aspects of business operations can be automated, leading to increased efficiency and reduced manual intervention. Redwood Software is a cloud-native platform, which offers scalability, flexibility, and reduced infrastructure costs.

Redwood Software users shares that its user interfaces is intuitive and this is reducing the learning curve and enabling users across different departments to leverage automation tools effectively. The platform offers sophisticated scheduling and workflow capabilities, allowing for the automation of complex processes.

Redwood Software excels in its ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide range of systems and applications. This integration is key for enterprises that operate in diverse IT environments, ensuring that automation can be implemented across different platforms and applications without compatibility issues. Another important factor for enterprises, is focus on compliance and security, Redwood Software incorporates robust security measures and compliance protocols.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent

AMD, American Home Shield, Avaya, Burberry, Centrica, City of Dallas, The Container Store, Core & Main, Daikin, Dart Containers, Deere, Energizer, Epson, Halliburton, Keen Foodware, National Gypsum, Rockport Group, Ryder, Technicolor, The University of Michigan, Virgin Money, Whitbread

Buyer's Guide

IBM Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

June 2025

Free Report: IBM Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Workload Automation vs. Redwood RunMyJobs report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.