Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Workload Automation vs Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Workload Automation
Ranking in Workload Automation
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mitratech TAP Workflow Auto...
Ranking in Workload Automation
46th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of IBM Workload Automation is 6.9%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation is 0.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Ilhami Arikan - PeerSpot reviewer
With an easy setup phase in place, agent-based installation can be done in minutes
Sometimes we have issues with the solution's stability. So, stability can be improved. Reporting and visibility of the solution need improvement. These days, we need more visibility. We need to access the logs and databases easily. You need to keep track of the running number of logs, like which ones are executed, completed, etc. So if there would be a good reporting dashboard, then it would be good. There's room for improvement in the solution since it is a challenging thing when we want to use the solution's technology with our new technologies. For example, if we need to use TWS on our OpenShift platform, the solution's API is not capable enough. So the product itself needs to be aligned with new technologies.
Use Mitratech TAP Workflow Automation?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
850,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
10%
Retailer
7%
Insurance Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Workload Automation?
IBM needs to move away from its native terminology and adopt a more cloud-centric approach. For example, IBM still refers to machines as 'workstations,' whereas other systems, like Control-M, use m...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent
Charles Stanley, Yahoo!, NetApp, Gilead Sciences, Allianz Ireland, Royal Dutch Shell, Juniper Networks, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, British American Tobacco, Keesal Young & Logan, Frimley Park Hospital, Ingersoll Rand, MUFG, Shawbrook Bank, Blackrock, Rabobank, Janus Henderson Group, SMBC, Aberdeen Asset Management, Transatlantic Re, Xerox, Express Scripts, University of Houston, AON, McDonald's, Electronic Arts, American Electric Power, AAA Insurance, Amgen, Buc-ee's, CDW, Chevron, DOW, Foresters Financial, HMS Host, HP, NuSkin, Reckitt Benckiser, United Technologies, Viacom, and CSP Global
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: April 2025.
850,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.