Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs Zulu Embedded comparison

IBM and Azul Systems are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #31, while Azul Systems is ranked #25. IBM holds a 1.0% mindshare in AIS, compared to Azul Systems’s 0.9% mindshare.
IBM WebSphere Integration D...
  • 129 Views
  • 120 Comparison Views
Zulu Embedded
  • 139 Views
  • 135 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Integration Developer and Zulu Embedded based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 879,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Integration D...
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
31st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zulu Embedded
Ranking in Application Infrastructure
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zulu Embedded is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Zulu Embedded0.9%
IBM WebSphere Integration Developer1.0%
Other98.1%
Application Infrastructure
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs IBM WebSphere Integration Developer Logo
IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs IBM WebSphere Integration Developer
Compared 100% of the time
More IBM WebSphere Integration Developer Competitors
Azul Zing vs Zulu Embedded Logo
Azul Zing vs Zulu Embedded
Compared 100% of the time
More Zulu Embedded Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
January 2026
IBM WebSphere Integration Developer reportDownload IBM WebSphere Integration Developer product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
January 2026
Zulu Embedded reportDownload Zulu Embedded product report
 

Also Known As

WebSphere Integration Developer
No data available
 

Overview

WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) is an integrated development environment for building applications based on service-oriented architecture (SOA).
IBM

Open Source Java for IoT & Embedded Systems.

Tired of high Java licensing costs, restrictive terms of use and proprietary vendor lock-in?

Azul is the world's largest commercial vendor delivering multi-platform, 100% open source OpenJDK builds targeting the embedded, IoT, and maker communities.

Azul Systems
 

Sample Customers

The City of Edinburgh Council, Factor-y S.r.l., Alleyoop Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Airbus, Wittmann EDV-Systeme, The Chevrolet Volt, Federal Employment Agency, Web Business Consulting, Rosenthal & Rosenthal
V2COMM
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.