• Home
  • IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs. Zulu Embedded

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs Zulu Embedded comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Integration Developer and Zulu Embedded based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
26th
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
90
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
273
Comparisons
240
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Integration Developer
Learn More
IBM
Azul Systems
Overview
WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) is an integrated development environment for building applications based on service-oriented architecture (SOA).

Open Source Java for IoT & Embedded Systems.

Tired of high Java licensing costs, restrictive terms of use and proprietary vendor lock-in?

Azul is the world's largest commercial vendor delivering multi-platform, 100% open source OpenJDK builds targeting the embedded, IoT, and maker communities.

Sample Customers
The City of Edinburgh Council, Factor-y S.r.l., Alleyoop Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Airbus, Wittmann EDV-Systeme, The Chevrolet Volt, Federal Employment Agency, Web Business Consulting, Rosenthal & Rosenthal
V2COMM
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer24%
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company17%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise78%
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is ranked 26th in Application Infrastructure while Zulu Embedded is ranked 22nd in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is rated 0.0, while Zulu Embedded is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is most compared with E2E Bridge, whereas Zulu Embedded is most compared with Azul Zulu, Azul Zing and Apache Web Server.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.