IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

48th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus	1.1%
Other	97.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Christophe LAMAMY

Architecte Solutions at Novahe

Complex deployment has limited adoption but has provided structured backup management

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is very simple to deploy for us, but for more clients or competitors, the solution is hard to deploy and to integrate. For our team, deployment of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus may take a couple of days and longer if you have a complex customer solution. The deployment itself is not very lengthy, but the integration in production is more complicated. I assess the efficiency of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus's Advanced Snapshot Technology as not good because they change a lot of things. During multiple versions, we have experienced many changes in the product, and from the customer's view, it is not a good product because with each evolution, we encounter problems. We do not sell this product or advise this product. For SLA management features with IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, I utilize file level. SLA management is a good solution and a good idea, but the product does not work well, and customers do not adopt this product. I cannot assess the integration capability of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus using RESTful API. I cannot determine what benefit IBM Spectrum Protect Plus brings to the organization because we deployed this solution with one customer, and that customer changed the product after one or two years because the product is not stable and it changes with every version. The customer wanted to move away from this solution. The price of the product is good, but the solution does not adapt to the market. The market in France does not adopt IBM Spectrum Protect Plus.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We conducted a proof-of-concept on the customer side, and they found the product to be user-friendly and extremely useful."

"The solution integrates well with other tools."

"The biggest benefit of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is that it's an agentless backup product which is very easy to configure and use."

"A full-featured data protection solution that is reliable and stable."

"Pricing is good; it is reasonable and more reasonable than any other vendors."

"If you want to have a strong backup for recovery and restore, you need this solution."

"This solution is very stable and has good support available online."

"The solution's stability is high because it is derived from Spectrum Protect."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus pros

"The best and biggest improvement for us is that we can rely on the backups it provides."

"It is a very good application that does the job and provides everything any basic backup application should do."

"We are able to slowly, but surely, consolidate all the backup infrastructure requirements with one product."

"Data Protector was cheaper and would do what we needed to do."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"Our complete Data Centre HP Data Protector deployment was AU$46,000."

"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."

"Data Protector works in conjunction with a Catalyst-based deduplication feature and HPE StoreOnce appliances to provide us with the tools to build reliable DR solutions for backups through Catalyst stores replication using ARS between the sites."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"IBM Spectrum Protect Plus could improve security."

"There could be better integration with Spectrum Protect and Spectrum Protect Plus, it should be one solution."

"I would like more integration with security. We need to show the value of the product in regards to handling security. For example, how it handles current malware or viruses. IBM should be more proactive in this direction."

"We have to do a tech refresh, during the migration process and it doesn't allow a straightforward pathway."

"In the future, I would like to see support for global deduplication."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is the actual schedule that you get on the policies."

"There's significant room for improvement. They are not yet where I want them to be."

"The replication feature is not available."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus cons

"When it comes to hardware support, HPE will help you in a minimal amount time. When in comes to software problems, you do not know when they will close your issues."

"I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."

"The license structure for advanced features, such as backing up to disk or compression, can make the license pretty costly."

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

"There are lots of bugs around; inability to downgrade version, issues with version upgrades, etc."

"Support is poor, I would rate it a two out of five."

"We didn't know exactly where this solution would go a few years ago. It was in a storage department and then later in a software department."

"In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now. There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depends on the licensing options that you choose."

"IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is a little expensive."

"I rate the price of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus a one on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is very cheap."

"The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original."

"The initial cost of the product is perpetual but the support fees are billed annually."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, we paid for implementation and training."

"We have a perpetual license for the tool since it is deployed on-premise."

"Clients prefer to buy a perpetual license, but the majority opt for a yearly subscription."

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

Pricing is good; it is reasonable and more reasonable than any other vendors.

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

What is your primary use case for IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

We are an IT integrator and we need to have a good vision of all recovery and backup recovery solutions. Most frequently, we use Veeam Backup. We use Cohesity. For some old workloads, we use IBM TS...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

IBM Storage Protect vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 5% of the time

Atempo Live Navigator vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 4% of the time

IBM ProtectTIER vs IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Protect Plus Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus

Download IBM Spectrum Protect Plus product report

OpenText Data Protector

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus offers seamless integration with major databases and platforms, effective data deduplication, and agentless operation, providing reliable backup and restoration solutions to cater to diverse enterprise needs.

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus delivers expansive compatibility with Oracle, Microsoft SQL, IBM Db2, AIX, and Linux. It supports virtual snapshots and cloud backups, ensuring storage optimization and quick deployment. Despite needing enhancements in administration and integration, it effectively manages virtual machine backups for on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. Its functionality includes data protection, backup validation, disaster recovery, and cost-effective storage capabilities, specifically tailored for different departments in an organization.

What are the most important features of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

Seamless Integration: Works well with Oracle, Microsoft SQL, IBM Db2
Multi-Platform Support: Compatible with AIX and Linux
Virtual Snapshots: Facilitates easy restoration
Data Deduplication: Optimizes storage costs efficiently
Cloud Backup Support: Expands data protection reach
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment and management

What benefits or ROI should be looked for in IBM Spectrum Protect Plus?

Quick Deployment: Saves time and resources in setup
Data Security: Enhances protection against data loss
Storage Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces expenses with deduplication
Robust API Functionality: Flexibility for custom integrations
Ease of Use: Streamlines user experience across departments

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is widely used to secure virtual machines and databases across industries, supporting offline backups and rapid processes. Its adaptability in specific sectors like finance and healthcare aids in maintaining data reliability and meeting compliance standards.

IBM

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

PT Wings Surya, Tectrade, State of Ohio

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs. OpenText Data Protector