"Its reliability and after-sales support are very good."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The setup was easy and not complicated."
"Very practical and easy to maintain."
"It's easy to upgrade, and it is very easy to take care of the firmware upgrades."
"We are quite satisfied with the technical support. We have a direct contact with our HP support. They are always very useful."
"HPE ProLiant DL Servers are a great product. We don't have many complaints."
"The initial setup was easy."
"It is stable and easy to manage."
"The price in general, including the licensing fee, could be better."
"The implementation should be simplified, it is not straightforward."
"The price of this solution should be lowered to make it more competitive."
"They should continue to maintain the stability that is there."
"The most pressing issue is that downloads depend at present on the current period."
"They are pretty solid servers, but, just like all servers, they become obsolete after some time. They can maybe provide a console to monitor the health of the servers. There should be some kind of console to which you can log in to remotely check on the health of a server, even when the server is off. The servers that we have are only scalable to some extent. They have got a limited amount of hard drive that you can insert. Their scalability should be improved."
"The solution could improve by providing more best practices from an architectural point of view. What are some recommended configurations for use, such as in a VM environment? HP provides some best practices but they are based on VMware, not on Red Hat. It would benefit for others to see the different use cases. How the HPE ProLiant DL Servers were used in the context of Red hat virtualization, and some configurations as an example to allow us to identify some points that we can improve in our platform. We could make our system more reliable and scalable."
"The solution should work to be more scalable."
"The shipment time can be improved. When we order Intel products, we have to wait for a long time. They can increase the local services and engineers in China. Local engineers will be able to know and understand customer problems much better."
Earn 20 points
HPE ProLiant DL Servers is ranked 1st in Rack Servers with 31 reviews while Intel Server System is ranked 11th in Rack Servers with 1 review. HPE ProLiant DL Servers is rated 8.8, while Intel Server System is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of HPE ProLiant DL Servers writes "Built-in software management and redundancy for solid stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intel Server System writes "Stable and easy to manage, but needs better shipment time and local support". HPE ProLiant DL Servers is most compared with Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, HPE Apollo, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and Dell EMC XR2 Rugged Server, whereas Intel Server System is most compared with IBM Power Systems, Oracle SPARC Servers, Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers, HPE Apollo and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers.
See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
