Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers and IBM Power Systems compete in the enterprise server market. Dell seems to have the upper hand in remote management and cost-effectiveness, while IBM excels in handling intensive workloads with advanced features.
Features: Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers stand out for reliable remote management capabilities, robust scalability, and strong virtualization integration. They incorporate excellent management tools like iDRAC and OpenManage, enhancing user convenience and reliability. IBM Power Systems are renowned for exceptional performance and stability, making them ideal for intensive workloads and complex environments. Their processing power and virtualization capabilities are highly regarded.
Room for Improvement: Dell could enhance firmware update processes, improve analytics, and increase power efficiency. More comprehensive user documentation and clearer management tools are also desired. IBM Power Systems might need to address high costs, provide clearer cloud licensing, and simplify management for better ease of use without compromising performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell is often praised for simple deployments and responsive technical support, offering both on-premises and hybrid solutions. Users report a positive customer service experience with Dell, appreciated for efficiency and resource accessibility. IBM, while high-performing, can be complex to deploy, often requiring more specialized support, yet customer service across both companies remains well-regarded.
Pricing and ROI: Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are viewed as cost-effective with clear pricing structures aiding straightforward budgeting and investment returns. Customers appreciate the predictable and competitive pricing. IBM Power Systems, though offering substantial performance benefits, have higher pricing and a more complex licensing, making ROI more challenging for smaller organizations, contrasting with Dell's more accessible pricing.
By not having to worry about it, I would estimate we save two to four hours a week, depending on what's happening, such as if we need to spin up a new server, which would contribute to more time if done the old way.
In my immediate case for antenna analysis, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers offer a reduction from days of computing to half a day or hours.
The value of uptime to us is critical.
It has always been scheduled maintenance, which says a lot for a production environment, as we haven't had to call in a trouble ticket for the actual hardware during its entire run.
Typically, the contacts we have on-site are very knowledgeable, they come in within a day and usually have it fixed and taken care of if there are issues.
When we had a power supply failure out of the box, we called support, and they delivered the replacement within four hours as promised.
I try to get my support calls pre-routed to the US; I'd rather wait a couple of hours for support becoming available there than going to support somewhere in the Philippines or Indonesia.
The scalability of Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers is excellent.
Any outages or blackouts are limited to particular servers, not affecting the whole chassis or enclosures.
We bought our product with scaling involved, and we've been scaling it up anytime we've needed more storage.
Over four years, we've had less than 1 percent downtime.
There is a feature to update the server while it is running, so there is no need to restart.
We have truly not had any downtime on the infrastructure at all.
We need to know about any upcoming updates so that we can plan accordingly.
The beneficial aspect of that feature was that we could skip the PowerStore and just have the Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers alone, as they also served as storage, which helped us save money.
This forces you to go up to a larger server to get the desired processor, which increases the cost.
They have been stable and running for years without performance downtime or significant disc failures.
Some customers find it cheaper due to contractual agreements, while others find it expensive, especially when scaling up.
The software associated with servers, like VMware subscription licenses, drives costs.
They keep running for at least five to seven years without any issues.
With PowerEdge Servers, I don't need a one-to-one ratio redundancy, which leads to about eighty percent downtime reduction.
One of the valuable features is Active Directory, which helps in managing the network.
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are designed to optimize performance and efficiency in a data center environment, supporting various applications. Dell stands as the leading vendor in accelerated servers for AI, commanding a 33.8% revenue share. Based on user reviews, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers supporting tasks from basic web hosting to more demanding applications like data analytics and virtualization. They are engineered to offer high performance, reliability, and scalability. With a focus on automation and integrated security, these servers simplify operations and protect against threats, making them a smart choice for businesses of all sizes.
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are a robust, secure, and scalable solution that can meet the diverse needs of businesses, backed by comprehensive support. Benefits to look for in reviews include performance, reliability, scalability, and customer support.
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers key features include:
In terms of implementation, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are used across various industries, from small businesses to large enterprises. They serve as the foundation for IT infrastructure, powering critical applications in healthcare, finance, education, and more. The adaptability of these servers means they can be tailored to specific industry needs, from handling large datasets in research institutions to supporting high-transaction databases in financial services.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.