IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy vs Protegrity Data Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy and Protegrity Data Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Masking Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is very stable and flexible. The product masks data throughout the entire structure. It helps us to work in a differential integrity environment. We conducted testing directly on our production environment in the past, but that’s no longer the case. We can now work with actual data in a production-like setting without production data. The shift to non-production data for testing and development has significantly improved our workflow."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy Pros →

"The product is stable.""Its technical support team is helpful.""The solution’s pricing is moderate.""The most valuable feature of Protegrity Data Security is the reduction of information being exposed."

More Protegrity Data Security Pros →

Cons
"We have encountered challenges with different intgrity structures. In my experience, I’ve encountered challenges with implementing business cases. While the product remains stable, translating its use cases can be more complex. This involves both technical and functional considerations."

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy Cons →

"Protegrity Data Security could improve by having more integration.""The solution's UI could be better.""Protegrity is using a different OS which has some bugs. Sometimes it's causing an initialization error."

More Protegrity Data Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy's pricing is not expensive. It was less than what we expected. The licensing model for IBM Optim involves a one-time purchase followed by an annual subscription fee. This fee covers ongoing support and access to new versions. However, there are no options for extended or additional support."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We pay for a few additional services apart from its licenses."
  • More Protegrity Data Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is very stable and flexible. The product masks data throughout the entire structure. It helps us to work in a differential integrity environment. We conducted testing directly on our… more »
    Top Answer:IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy's pricing is not expensive. It was less than what we expected. The licensing model for IBM Optim involves a one-time purchase followed by an annual subscription fee… more »
    Top Answer:We have encountered challenges with different intgrity structures. In my experience, I’ve encountered challenges with implementing business cases. While the product remains stable, translating its use… more »
    Top Answer:Protegrity is using a different OS, which has some bugs. Sometimes, it's causing an initialization error.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to encrypt sensitive data like PII data. Any unauthorized person cannot find the exact sensitive value in case of data issues. We are using that tool to protect sensitive data.
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 31 in Data Masking
    Views
    140
    Comparisons
    98
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    514
    Rating
    8.0
    5th
    out of 31 in Data Masking
    Views
    691
    Comparisons
    466
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    9.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Optim Data Privacy, Optim Data Privacy
    Learn More
    Overview

    Optim Data Privacy supports Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) and is based on the Advanced Encryption Standard 256-bit (AES-256) algorithm providing the capability to produce unique masked values that are extremely varied and without a discernible pattern.

    Organizations leveraging networked applications and services benefit from the flexibility and convenience of being able to create and access data across multiple devices and users. At the same time, sensitive data, including health and personally identifiable information, may need to be protected or de-identified to satisfy regulations or internal privacy policies.

    Protegrity Data Security Gateway addresses these security, privacy, and compliance risks with advanced encryption and tokenization to transparently protect sensitive data as it moves across the network. By securing data in real-time as it is transmitted, enterprises are assured that data automatically adhere to rules governing sensitive data at all times.

    Transparently protect sensitive data across the network without modifying applications or database calls. Protect applications and API’s quickly without impacting your business.

    Sample Customers
    Rabobank
    A $4 billion retail conglomerate and holding company
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Masking
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is ranked 9th in Data Masking with 1 review while Protegrity Data Security is ranked 5th in Data Masking with 3 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is rated 8.0, while Protegrity Data Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy writes "A stable and flexible product that improves development time ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Protegrity Data Security writes "Beneficial data security, good support, and straightforward initial setup". IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, whereas Protegrity Data Security is most compared with Voltage SecureData Enterprise, Microsoft Purview, Immuta, Oracle Advanced Security and IBM Security Guardium Data Protection.

    See our list of best Data Masking vendors.

    We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.