IBM Db2 Database vs Infobright DB comparison

IBM and IgniteTech are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while IgniteTech is ranked #37. IBM holds a 6.6% mindshare in SQL, compared to IgniteTech’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of IgniteTech users who would recommend it.

IBM Db2 Database

Read 75 IBM Db2 Database reviews

3,607 Views
3,463 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

654 Views
334 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IBM Db2 Database

Infobright DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

IBM Db2 Database and Infobright DB compete in the database management systems category. IBM Db2 holds an advantage with its robust support and pricing, while Infobright DB is preferred for its unique features and quick delivery of value.

Features: IBM Db2 offers seamless integration with IBM products, strong analytics capabilities, and unparalleled reliability, making it ideal for large enterprises with demanding data environments. Infobright DB excels in data compression, fast processing, and its ability to handle high-performance analytic queries, ideal for businesses focusing on large datasets and swift analytics.

Room for Improvement: IBM Db2 could improve in reducing setup complexity and enhancing user interface design. Additionally, streamlining licensing procedures could enhance user accessibility. Infobright DB can benefit from expanding its transactional processing features, optimizing cloud integration, and enhancing SQL compatibility for broader use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Db2 provides a versatile deployment range with robust support, assisting businesses with extensive configuration needs, making it a strong choice for enterprises requiring detailed deployment and strong service support. Infobright DB offers rapid deployment with minimal requirements and responsive support, tailored to the needs of small and medium-sized businesses seeking quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Db2 has higher setup costs, aligned with its advanced features and capability to deliver substantial ROI for complex projects. Infobright DB presents a cost-effective approach with a lower initial investment, offering quick ROI due to efficient data management features, appealing to cost-sensitive organizations focusing on faster delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Db2 Database vs. Infobright DB Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Db2 Database vs. Infobright DB

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Db2 Database

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Db2 Database is 6.6%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Db2 Database	6.6%
Infobright DB	0.9%
Other	92.5%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2708292

Associate Director, Data Architecture at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Support improves setup and maintenance while pricing influences decision

If you have a similar use case and the same deal with IBM as our company, it is definitely a good option and choice. The company I work with has more than 50,000 people and more than 500 support staff. We are not locked into one database vendor. We typically work with multiple database vendors simultaneously, selecting the top choice based on the deals we make and other considerations. We do not use IBM Db2 Database related to AI at this moment because our AI project PLC is still very small scale. We may consider it in the future if we have enough scale. Overall rating for IBM Db2 Database is 8.5 out of 10.

Read full review

it_user708987

MySQL DBA at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Excellent reporting server that is compatible with MySQL

We ran into some quirks that Infobright had. We interacted with Infobright's support and were able to resolve them. There still are issues with data replication - Infobright is currently for one server (unless you buy the Infobright appliance). This would mean that redundancy is something you need to implement yourself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scales well enough for a relational database."

"The solution helps secure the database."

"The self-management and optimization features are probably the best on the market"

"When you submit a ticket the response time is quick."

"The solution is a very stable relational database and has integration with legacy systems. It is a great product."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the integration with other IBM products."

"Db2 Database has given us good results since we have started to use it. We predominantly use IBM hardware, and this is one of the reasons why we started to use Db2 Database. Db2 Database has a very good HADR capability. High availability resilience is also good in this solution. It also has pureScale, which allows you to upgrade one node to get very good and high-level resilience. If you are using a database on five nodes, you can take one node down, upgrade that, and let that node up. You can then bring the second node down, upgrade that, and so on."

"it is very stable and runs smoothly once it is deployed and it is almost maintenance-free."

More IBM Db2 Database pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

Cons

"IBM Db2 Database could improve in the steps it takes for upgrades. It is not an easy process. The process of upgrading the version is lengthy and requires a lot of time. To make it more efficient, I suggest implementing some automation on the solution side. This will greatly reduce the time required for the upgrade."

"End-to-end encryption specifically is something the solution needs to have in the next release."

"The initial set up was complex."

"The product needs to improve its configuration and storage."

"The backup solution lacks flexibility."

"They could enhance the product's cloud integration and general-purpose database capabilities."

"The pricing could be improved, it's expensive."

"The technical support team is not very good when compared to the efficiency of Oracle's support."

More IBM Db2 Database cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution costs less than other products."

"Compared to other databases, Db2 is relatively cheaper."

"The solution's pricing is fine."

"It's very expensive for West African countries like ours."

"Among Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and Db2, Microsoft SQL Server is the cheapest one, and Oracle is the most expensive one. Db2 is in the middle. As compared to SQL Server, its price could go down. It will be good for customers."

"It's very expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It's not super expensive, but also not cheap."

"We normally handle large size businesses and as far as I am aware, the license is negotiable based on the number of users and the quantitative data."

More IBM Db2 Database pricing and cost advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	48

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Db2 Database?

Db2 database scalability and performance capabilities match our database needs. It covers pretty much everything a database administrator or engineer might need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Db2 Database?

IBM Db2 is an expensive solution. While I am not heavily involved with pricing, additional companies provide capabilities or products like those from BMC, which many installations might also purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Db2 Database?

The IBM Db2 Database is a good solution, but now there is a high maintenance charge. The IBM Db2 Database needs improved support, and there are many difficulties in using it. We tend to use the clo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SQL Server vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 40% of the time

Oracle Database vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 17% of the time

SAP HANA vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 9% of the time

Teradata vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 9% of the time

MySQL vs IBM Db2 Database

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Db2 Database Competitors

Amazon RDS on Outposts vs Infobright DB

Compared 14% of the time

TIBCO Live Datamart vs Infobright DB

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Infobright DB

Compared 13% of the time

Teradata vs Infobright DB

Compared 11% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs Infobright DB

Compared 11% of the time

More Infobright DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Db2 Database

January 2026

Download IBM Db2 Database product report

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

January 2026

Download Infobright DB product report

Also Known As

DB2

Infobright

Overview

DB2 Enterprise for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is the ideal data server for the most demanding workloads. New XML support is designed to help firms minimize the time and effort it takes to persist and use their XML data reducing development costs and improving business agility.

IBM

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

IgniteTech

Sample Customers

Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

Buyer's Guide

IBM Db2 Database vs. Infobright DB

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Db2 Database vs. Infobright DB

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Db2 Database vs. Infobright DB and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Db2 Database vs. Infobright DB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.