

IBM Db2 and MySQL compete in the database management system category. While IBM Db2 is known for its advanced features and enterprise-level support, MySQL stands out for its open-source availability and cost-effectiveness.
Features: IBM Db2 is recognized for its robust SQL dialect, cross-platform flexibility, and self-tuning features, which optimize performance without manual intervention. It also offers strong memory management, platform support, and security as highlighted by user reviews. In contrast, MySQL is popular for its open-source model, providing features like strong replication, a multi-threaded architecture, and compatibility with various programming languages. Users note its integration capabilities and affordability.
Room for Improvement: IBM Db2 faces challenges such as complex learning curves, licensing complications, and limited support for advanced analytics, making user management cumbersome. MySQL struggles with certain performance issues, reliability in replication, and lacks some enterprise-level features and robust development tools. Enhancements in usability and integration for both databases could improve user experiences.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Db2 is primarily used on-premises, with a hybrid model offering limited cloud adaptability. Users report mixed experiences with technical support, noting regional discrepancies in response times. MySQL is versatile, functioning across on-premises, private, and public cloud environments. Users benefit from community support but may face slower service for critical issues compared to dedicated enterprise support models.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Db2 is seen as expensive, though analyses show it provides a good return on investment through its comprehensive capabilities. It often requires negotiation for cost-effectiveness, especially in enterprise settings. MySQL, being open source, offers a cost advantage with free community editions. However, the enterprise version carries costs, which some users find offset by the database’s robust features and community support, making it a suitable solution for diverse business needs.
I have seen a return on investment with MySQL, as it allows us to manage with fewer employees, focusing on business logic rather than database management.
We normally receive substantial discounts on the price.
I would rate the documentation and online support a 10 out of 10.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
MySQL's scalability is currently adequate, as we have increased operations from ten thousand to twelve thousand devices, and it is working fine for us.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
From my experience, MySQL was pretty stable.
It might be slightly slower than other database vendors, but it works well since banks typically do not move quickly with leading-edge technology.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly.
I would advise people thinking about using MySQL to look up if the indexing mechanism is useful for their needs and then accordingly select the right database, and also consider if relational databases make sense for their use case.
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
IBM Db2 Database, because of enterprise performance and support, is why banks still maintain their relationship with it.
The IBM Db2 Database is trusted, and IT effort is less than any other product.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
The main feature we utilize in MySQL is the view, and I can say that it is the most valuable feature for our needs.
MySQL has good documentation and online support.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| MySQL | 6.9% |
| IBM Db2 Database | 6.8% |
| Other | 86.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 74 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.
MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.
What are MySQL's key features?MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.