We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It continues to keep up with the changing needs of the business. That is the strong value proposition of BPM. It's not a one-time automation."
"The Process Designer is good. We like how we can drag and drop and link the processes up, that works out great for us."
"It provides value and simplifies processes."
"Initially, the process architecture studio was very helpful and it was compliant with BPMN standards."
"The solution has helped us automate business processes."
"Some of the features that I like the most are team management and process performance. They are both very useful and very powerful with regard to the workflow."
"Our customers use the solution as a workflow platform to manage their processes."
"The installation was straightforward."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"I would like to see the front-end support improved because it should be fully integrated and supported."
"The user experience, while it has improved, should continue to improve."
"We would like better performance and more visibility on each step of the tool."
"It is a rather thick stack because you have to have WebSphere skills, IBM BPM skills, and an understanding of how the product runs on WebSphere. A lot of this will start to get a lot easier as they put it in containers, which will allow the platform to manage itself in some regards."
"Where it can be improved is Integration. I think that the direction that IBM is taking now, to have something that is much more integrated, that can be seen as one single solution, is clearly the right way."
"Our developers are complaining that it's too complex to maintain."
"I hope IBM uses something from IBM Content Navigator to make the interface easier to navigate."
"You must have good experience to work with it. It is not that easy. Its installation is complex, especially in the new version for business automation, and it could be improved. It has a safety application embedded inside it, and you need to do a lot of configuration to install it. I have been working for two days to resolve an issue."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 50th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.